IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v16y2023i1d10.1007_s12063-022-00276-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study of bottleneck-based release models and load-based ones in a hybrid MTO-MTS flow shop: an assessment by simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Federica Costa

    (Politecnico Di Milano)

  • Kaustav Kundu

    (National University of Singapore)

  • Matteo Rossini

    (Politecnico Di Milano)

  • Alberto Portioli-Staudacher

    (Politecnico Di Milano)

Abstract

Either make-to-order (MTO) or make-to-stock (MTS) alone cannot satisfy the customer demand. Therefore, companies in different sectors are trying to adopt a hybrid MTO-MTS production strategy. Unlike MTO or MTS, there are few research on hybrid MTO-MTS environment and very few considering the operational issues. The workload control seems to handle better the operational issues in the hybrid environment considering job shop configuration whereas drum buffer rope has been designed to handle the bottleneck issue in a pure flow shop. Therefore, the objective of this paper has been defined to compare bottleneck-based release models and load-based ones in a hybrid MTO-MTS flow shop. Simulation results are not clearly in favour of one over the other, since besides severity, there is another important factor to consider: the choice of control at the dispatching level, and its connected trade-offs. In particular, implementing this control with the bottleneck-based rule is effective for MTO performances, especially in cases of high severity. Instead, when control at dispatching is absent, the workload control as a release rule is preferred, leading also to the best lead times for low severity. The results demonstrate important managerial and research implications for bottleneck-based and load-based release models in MTO-MTS flow shops.

Suggested Citation

  • Federica Costa & Kaustav Kundu & Matteo Rossini & Alberto Portioli-Staudacher, 2023. "Comparative study of bottleneck-based release models and load-based ones in a hybrid MTO-MTS flow shop: an assessment by simulation," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 33-48, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:16:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-022-00276-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-022-00276-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-022-00276-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-022-00276-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashcroft, S. H., 1989. "Applying the principles of optimized production technology in a small manufacturing company," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1-4), pages 79-88, August.
    2. Matthias Thürer & Mark Stevenson, 2018. "On the beat of the drum: improving the flow shop performance of the Drum–Buffer–Rope scheduling mechanism," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(9), pages 3294-3305, May.
    3. Francas, David & Löhndorf, Nils & Minner, Stefan, 2011. "Machine and labor flexibility in manufacturing networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 165-174, May.
    4. Chakravorty, Satya S., 2001. "An evaluation of the DBR control mechanism in a job shop environment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 335-342, August.
    5. Kingsman, Brian & Hendry, Linda & Mercer, Alan & de Souza, Antonio, 1996. "Responding to customer enquiries in make-to-order companies Problems and solutions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 219-231, December.
    6. Beemsterboer, Bart & Land, Martin & Teunter, Ruud & Bokhorst, Jos, 2017. "Integrating make-to-order and make-to-stock in job shop control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Golmohammadi, Davood, 2015. "A study of scheduling under the theory of constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 38-50.
    8. Chakravorty, Satya S. & Atwater, J. Brian, 2005. "The impact of free goods on the performance of drum-buffer-rope scheduling systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 347-357, March.
    9. Thomas Hutter & Stefan Haeussler & Hubert Missbauer, 2018. "Successful implementation of an order release mechanism based on workload control: a case study of a make-to-stock manufacturer," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 1565-1580, February.
    10. Soman, Chetan Anil & van Donk, Dirk Pieter & Gaalman, Gerard, 2004. "Combined make-to-order and make-to-stock in a food production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 223-235, July.
    11. Duclos, Leslie K. & Spencer, Michael S., 1995. "The impact of a constraint buffer in a flow shop," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 175-185, December.
    12. Hendry, L. & Land, M. & Stevenson, M. & Gaalman, G., 2008. "Investigating implementation issues for workload control (WLC): A comparative case study analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 452-469, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sato, Yutaro & Maeda, Hiroyuki & Toshima, Ryusei & Nagasawa, Keisuke & Morikawa, Katsumi & Takahashi, Katsuhiko, 2023. "Switching decisions in a hybrid MTS/MTO production system comprising multiple machines considering setup," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thürer, Matthias & Stevenson, Mark, 2018. "Bottleneck-oriented order release with shifting bottlenecks: An assessment by simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 275-282.
    2. Thürer, Matthias & Stevenson, Mark & Silva, Cristovao & Qu, Ting, 2017. "Drum-buffer-rope and workload control in High-variety flow and job shops with bottlenecks: An assessment by simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 116-127.
    3. Golmohammadi, Davood, 2015. "A study of scheduling under the theory of constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 38-50.
    4. Pereira, Daniel Filipe & Oliveira, José Fernando & Carravilla, Maria Antónia, 2022. "Merging make-to-stock/make-to-order decisions into sales and operations planning: A multi-objective approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Onay, Anita & Stampfer, Christina & Missbauer, Hubert, 2023. "A behavioral perspective on workload control concepts: The influence of order release on operators’ reaction behavior," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    6. Agra, Agostinho & Poss, Michael & Santos, Micael, 2018. "Optimizing make-to-stock policies through a robust lot-sizing model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 302-310.
    7. Dieter Fiems & Eline De Cuypere & Koen De Turck & Dieter Claeys, 2020. "Performance Analysis of Hybrid MTS/MTO Systems with Stochastic Demand and Production," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Stevenson, Mark & Huang, Yuan & Hendry, Linda C. & Soepenberg, Erik, 2011. "The theory and practice of workload control: A research agenda and implementation strategy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 689-700, June.
    9. Sato, Yutaro & Maeda, Hiroyuki & Toshima, Ryusei & Nagasawa, Keisuke & Morikawa, Katsumi & Takahashi, Katsuhiko, 2023. "Switching decisions in a hybrid MTS/MTO production system comprising multiple machines considering setup," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    10. Cakravastia, Andi & Toha, Isa S. & Nakamura, Nobuto, 2002. "A two-stage model for the design of supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 231-248, December.
    11. Unai Apaolaza & Aitor Orue & Aitor Lizarralde & Aitor Oyarbide-Zubillaga, 2022. "Competitive Improvement through Integrated Management of Sales and Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Sangcheol Song, 2014. "Subsidiary Divestment: The Role of Multinational Flexibility," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 47-70, February.
    13. Sharda, Bikram & Akiya, Naoko, 2012. "Selecting make-to-stock and postponement policies for different products in a chemical plant: A case study using discrete event simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 161-171.
    14. Henrich, Peter & Land, Martin & Gaalman, Gerard, 2006. "Grouping machines for effective workload control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 125-142, November.
    15. Yang, Hongbing & Li, Wenchao & Wang, Bin, 2021. "Joint optimization of preventive maintenance and production scheduling for multi-state production systems based on reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    16. Kerkkanen, Annastiina, 2007. "Determining semi-finished products to be stocked when changing the MTS-MTO policy: Case of a steel mill," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 111-118, July.
    17. Wikner, Joakim & Naim, Mohamed M. & Spiegler, Virginia L.M. & Lin, Junyi, 2017. "IOBPCS based models and decoupling thinking," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 153-166.
    18. Linda Zhang & Carman K.M. Lee & Pervaiz Akhtar, 2020. "Towards customization: Evaluation of integrated sales, product, and production configuration," Post-Print hal-03276827, HAL.
    19. Soman, Chetan Anil & Donk, Dirk Pieter van & Gaalman, Gerard, 2002. "Combined make-to-order and make-to-stock in a food production system," Research Report 02A49, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    20. Altendorfer, Klaus, 2017. "Relation between lead time dependent demand and capacity flexibility in a two-stage supply chain with lost sales," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 13-24.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:16:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-022-00276-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.