IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v25y2025i2d10.1007_s12351-025-00906-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A scheme for emergency material allocation based on decision makers' subjective preference

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Liu

    (Chongqing University of Science and Technology)

  • Yanbin Cheng

    (Chongqing University of Science and Technology)

  • Yuqing Lin

    (The University of Newcastle
    Jimei University)

  • Zhengyang Wu

    (Chongqing University of Science and Technology)

  • Chenye Guo

    (Southwest Branch of China National Coal Group Corporation)

Abstract

Emergency Material Allocation (EMA) plays a critical role in emergency response efforts. To ensure the equitable allocation of limited emergency rescue materials to Emergency Demand Points (EDPs) under conditions of limited information, this paper proposes a novel EMA approach. The proposed method accounts for Situation Factors (SFs), which capture the severity of damage at EDPs, as well as the perspectives of Emergency Decision-Makers regarding the conditions at these points. Numerical simulations demonstrate that: (i) the approach produces allocations proportional to the severity of the disaster as indicated by the SFs; and (ii) it respects the collective opinions of EDMs, ensuring an allocation aligned with their aggregated evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Liu & Yanbin Cheng & Yuqing Lin & Zhengyang Wu & Chenye Guo, 2025. "A scheme for emergency material allocation based on decision makers' subjective preference," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1-26, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:25:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-025-00906-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-025-00906-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-025-00906-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-025-00906-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:25:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-025-00906-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.