IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v23y2023i4d10.1007_s12351-023-00804-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group game cross-efficiency order allocation model based on regret theory and decision consensus

Author

Listed:
  • Xing Shao

    (Guizhou University)

  • Meiqiang Wang

    (Guizhou University)

Abstract

The traditional order allocation model primarily adopts a multi-objective programming approach. This approach is optimized for profit maximization and cost minimization to obtain the order allocation scheme. However, supplier efficiency is typically an important overlooked index in the order allocation process. In addition, only one decision-maker (DM) usually participates in the decision-making process. Furthermore, the bounded rationality of DMs under the risk state is not considered. Therefore, we established a group game cross-efficiency order allocation model (GGCE-OA) based on regret theory and decision consensus. First, regret theory was used to describe DMs’ subjective preferences and capture their bounded rational behaviours. Second, based on the contribution degree and the corresponding iterative algorithm, the weight modification model is established under the group game cross-efficiency evaluation framework to improve the decision consensus among DMs. Third, to allocate orders from the perspective of improving supplier efficiency, we established the GGCE-OA model based on regret theory and decision consensus, as well as establishing the corresponding iterative algorithm. This enabled us to obtain a fair, unique and accepted order allocation scheme by all DMs. Finally, the model established in this paper was applied for order allocations to green suppliers to verify its effectiveness and practicability.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing Shao & Meiqiang Wang, 2023. "Group game cross-efficiency order allocation model based on regret theory and decision consensus," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1-39, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:23:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s12351-023-00804-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-023-00804-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-023-00804-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-023-00804-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu Sun & Huixia Huang & Chi Zhou, 2016. "DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model to Urban Public Infrastructure Investment Comprehensive Efficiency of China," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-10, March.
    2. Yan Zou & Weijie Chen & Mingyu Tong & Shuo Tao, 2021. "DEA Cross-Efficiency Aggregation with Deviation Degree Based on Standardized Euclidean Distance," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-10, March.
    3. Hou, Fujun & Triantaphyllou, Evangelos, 2019. "An iterative approach for achieving consensus when ranking a finite set of alternatives by a group of experts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 570-579.
    4. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    5. Chai, Junyi & Ngai, Eric W.T., 2015. "Multi-perspective strategic supplier selection in uncertain environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 215-225.
    6. Du, Juan & Cook, Wade D. & Liang, Liang & Zhu, Joe, 2014. "Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 206-214.
    7. L. Martínez & J. Montero, 2007. "Challenges For Improving Consensus Reaching Process In Collective Decisions," New Mathematics and Natural Computation (NMNC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 203-217.
    8. David E. Bell, 1982. "Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 961-981, October.
    9. Salvatore Greco & Alessio Ishizaka & Menelaos Tasiou & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2019. "On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 61-94, January.
    10. Zhang, Hengjie & Dong, Yucheng & Chiclana, Francisco & Yu, Shui, 2019. "Consensus efficiency in group decision making: A comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 580-598.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinyi Hu, 2023. "Linguistic Multiple-Attribute Decision Making Based on Regret Theory and Minimax-DEA," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Liu, Hui-hui & Song, Yao-yao & Liu, Xiao-xiao & Yang, Guo-liang, 2020. "Aggregating the DEA prospect cross-efficiency with an application to state key laboratories in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio & Tasiou, Menelaos & Torrisi, Gianpiero, 2018. "σ-µ efficiency analysis: A new methodology for evaluating units through composite indices," MPRA Paper 83569, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Fusco, Elisa, 2023. "Potential improvements approach in composite indicators construction: The Multi-directional Benefit of the Doubt model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Khatab Alqararah, 2023. "Assessing the robustness of composite indicators: the case of the Global Innovation Index," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Li, Feng & Zhu, Qingyuan & Chen, Zhi, 2019. "Allocating a fixed cost across the decision making units with two-stage network structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 139-154.
    7. Fatemeh Ghandi & Mostafa Davtalab-Olyaie & Masoud Asgharian, 2024. "Peer-evaluation in centrally managed systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 333(1), pages 439-459, February.
    8. Akram Dehnokhalaji & Mojtaba Ghiyasi & Pekka Korhonen, 2017. "Resource allocation based on cost efficiency," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1279-1289, October.
    9. Weiwei Zhu & Qian Zhang & Haiqing Wang, 2019. "Fixed costs and shared resources allocation in two-stage network DEA," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 177-194, July.
    10. Chu, Junfei & Wu, Jie & Chu, Chengbin & Zhang, Tinglong, 2020. "DEA-based fixed cost allocation in two-stage systems: Leader-follower and satisfaction degree bargaining game approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Gulati, Rachita & Kattumuri, Ruth & Kumar, Sunil, 2020. "A non-parametric index of corporate governance in the banking industry: An application to Indian data," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Giuliano Resce & Fritz Schiltz, 2021. "Sustainable Development in Europe: A Multicriteria Decision Analysis," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 67(2), pages 509-529, June.
    13. Cherchye, Laurens & De Rock, Bram & Walheer, Barnabé, 2016. "Multi-output profit efficiency and directional distance functions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 100-109.
    14. Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio & Tasiou, Menelaos & Torrisi, Gianpiero, 2019. "Sigma-Mu efficiency analysis: A methodology for evaluating units through composite indicators," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 942-960.
    15. Ruiz, Francisco & El Gibari, Samira & Cabello, José M. & Gómez, Trinidad, 2020. "MRP-WSCI: Multiple reference point based weak and strong composite indicators," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    16. Ding, Jingjing & Dong, Wei & Liang, Liang & Zhu, Joe, 2017. "Goal congruence analysis in multi-Division Organizations with shared resources based on data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 961-973.
    17. Gulati, Rachita & Charles, Vincent & Kumar, Sunil, 2024. "School education development index: A meta-frontier range directional measure benefit-of-the-doubt model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    18. Faramarz Khosravi & Gokhan Izbirak, 2025. "A copula-based exponential probabilistic model for factor-dependence social sustainability assessment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 433-481, January.
    19. Liu, Yong-Jun & Yang, Guo-Sen & Zhang, Wei-Guo, 2024. "A novel regret-rejoice cross-efficiency approach for energy stock portfolio optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    20. Andrea C. Hupman & Jay Simon, 2023. "The Legacy of Peter Fishburn: Foundational Work and Lasting Impact," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:23:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s12351-023-00804-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.