Author
Listed:
- Hongjun Cui
(Hebei University of Technology)
- Yue Su
(Hebei University of Technology)
- Xiushi Dong
(Hebei University of Technology)
- Minqing Zhu
(Hebei University of Technology)
Abstract
The functionality of the road network after earthquakes is crucial for maximizing rescue efficiency. However, the existing regional road network vulnerability assessment methods still cannot effectively guide the design of a high-rescue efficiency network. In this context, this paper proposes the regional multi-state road network model combining the population distribution, multi-state characteristics of road infrastructures, and real network topology. Based on this, this paper proposes the post-earthquake road network vulnerability assessment method from the perspective of external rescue supply support capacity. Then, the proposed method is applied to two real regional road network cases. Finally, the post-earthquake road network vulnerability mechanisms and road network planning methods with low vulnerability can be explored by comparing different network models in various cases. In addition, this paper observes significant heterogeneities in post-earthquake road network performance loss caused by different roads, explained by road vulnerability and the availability of alternative routes. The road network design with alternative routes has lower vulnerability and higher supply capacity. Furthermore, accurate quantification of road network performance requires considering multi-state characteristics and real network structure, especially in dense road networks. This research provides important insights into road network modeling and design for earthquake rescue.
Suggested Citation
Hongjun Cui & Yue Su & Xiushi Dong & Minqing Zhu, 2025.
"Multi-state road network modeling and vulnerability assessment in regional areas for earthquake rescue,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(13), pages 15859-15898, July.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:13:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07418-6
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07418-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:13:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07418-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.