IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v109y2021i2d10.1007_s11069-021-04882-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study of flash flood in ungauged watershed with special emphasizing on rough set theory for handling the missing hydrological values

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Waseem Boota

    (Zhengzhou University
    Zhengzhou University
    University of Lahore, Lahore Campus)

  • Chaode Yan

    (Zhengzhou University
    Zhengzhou University)

  • Tanveer Abbas

    (Mott MacDonald MM Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd)

  • Ziwei Li

    (Zhengzhou University
    Zhengzhou University)

  • Ming Dou

    (Zhengzhou University)

  • Ayesha Yousaf

    (University of Engineering and Technology Lahore)

Abstract

Prediction of the flash floods in ungauged or poorly gauging watershed is one of the challenging tasks in the field of hydrology and needs implication of advanced techniques to obtain the reliable results. In this study, an innovative artificial intelligence-based rough set theory (RST) was used to retrieve missing hydro-meteorological data which were utilized to build a forecast model to predict the flood event in an ungauged watershed in Pakistan (Thor Nullah). The RST-based forecast model was calibrated for 1986 to 2004 and tested for 2008 to 2016. The result showed that 9 out of 10 forecasting objects were predicted precisely. Basin data model technique along with rainfall–runoff (R.F-R.O) model and RST forecasting model was used to estimate the peak discharge of flood event occurred in 2015. The modeled peak discharge (1152 m3 s−1) was compared with the field observation-based highest flood marks (HFMs—1189 m3 s−1), which showed slight discrimination due to indeterminate model calibration sparse rain gauge density. Moreover, flood inundation map showed high flood risk to the 80% localities with a flood depth of 0.1–1.67 m in locality. Overall, this study suggested a reliable use of RST for data mining and flood modeling; however, the absence of adequate flow data at study site limits the reliability of R.F-R.O model calibration. Moreover, based on the array of flood hazard simulation studies, provision of channelization and cross-drainage works is suggested to protect the catchment against floods and debris brought down through catchment.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Waseem Boota & Chaode Yan & Tanveer Abbas & Ziwei Li & Ming Dou & Ayesha Yousaf, 2021. "Comparative study of flash flood in ungauged watershed with special emphasizing on rough set theory for handling the missing hydrological values," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(2), pages 1387-1405, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:109:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04882-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-04882-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-021-04882-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-021-04882-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Si-Hui Dong & Hui-Cheng Zhou & Hai-Jun Xu, 2004. "A Forecast Model of Hydrologic Single Element Medium and Long-Period Based on Rough Set Theory," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 18(5), pages 483-495, October.
    2. Stefanos Stefanidis & Dimitrios Stathis, 2013. "Assessment of flood hazard based on natural and anthropogenic factors using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 68(2), pages 569-585, September.
    3. Wenlin Yuan & Meiqi Liu & Fang Wan, 2019. "Calculation of Critical Rainfall for Small-Watershed Flash Floods Based on the HEC-HMS Hydrological Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(7), pages 2555-2575, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ebrahim Ahmadisharaf & Alfred Kalyanapu & Eun-Sung Chung, 2015. "Evaluating the Effects of Inundation Duration and Velocity on Selection of Flood Management Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(8), pages 2543-2561, June.
    2. Moumita Palchaudhuri & Sujata Biswas, 2016. "Application of AHP with GIS in drought risk assessment for Puruliya district, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 1905-1920, December.
    3. You, Heyuan & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2017. "Sustainable livelihoods and rural sustainability in China: Ecologically secure, economically efficient or socially equitable?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 1-13.
    4. Haibo Hu & Miao Yu & Xiya Zhang & Ying Wang, 2024. "Performance benchmarking on several regression models applied in urban flash flood risk assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(4), pages 3487-3504, March.
    5. Anirban Roy & Srabendu Bikash Dhar, 2024. "Assessment of flood vulnerability and identification of flood footprint in Keleghai River basin in India: a geo-spatial approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(5), pages 4853-4874, March.
    6. Ebrahim Ahmadisharaf & Alfred J. Kalyanapu & Eun-Sung Chung, 2017. "Sustainability-Based Flood Hazard Mapping of the Swannanoa River Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Yonas Ghile & Roland Schulze, 2010. "Evaluation of Three Numerical Weather Prediction Models for Short and Medium Range Agrohydrological Applications," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(5), pages 1005-1028, March.
    8. Reza Esmaili & Seyedeh Atefeh Karipour, 2024. "Comparison of weighting methods of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in evaluation of flood hazard index," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(9), pages 8619-8638, July.
    9. Mohamed Abdelkareem & Abbas M. Mansour, 2023. "Risk assessment and management of vulnerable areas to flash flood hazards in arid regions using remote sensing and GIS-based knowledge-driven techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 2269-2295, July.
    10. Shifa Chen & Xuan Zha, 2016. "Evaluation of soil erosion vulnerability in the Zhuxi watershed, Fujian Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(3), pages 1589-1607, July.
    11. Ashraf Abdelkarim & Ahmed F. D. Gaber & Ibtesam I. Alkadi & Haya M. Alogayell, 2019. "Integrating Remote Sensing and Hydrologic Modeling to Assess the Impact of Land-Use Changes on the Increase of Flood Risk: A Case Study of the Riyadh–Dammam Train Track, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-32, October.
    12. Hong Lv & Xinjian Guan & Yu Meng, 2020. "Comprehensive evaluation of urban flood-bearing risks based on combined compound fuzzy matter-element and entropy weight model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(2), pages 1823-1841, September.
    13. Hao Chen & Zongxue Xu & Yang Liu & Yixuan Huang & Fang Yang, 2022. "Urban Flood Risk Assessment Based on Dynamic Population Distribution and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Kadriye Burcu Yavuz Kumlu & Şule Tüdeş, 2019. "Determination of earthquake-risky areas in Yalova City Center (Marmara region, Turkey) using GIS-based multicriteria decision-making techniques (analytical hierarchy process and technique for order pr," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(3), pages 999-1018, April.
    15. Cameron Do & Yuriy Kuleshov, 2023. "Tropical cyclone multi-hazard risk mapping for Queensland, Australia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 3725-3746, April.
    16. Francesca Franci & Gabriele Bitelli & Emanuele Mandanici & Diofantos Hadjimitsis & Athos Agapiou, 2016. "Satellite remote sensing and GIS-based multi-criteria analysis for flood hazard mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(1), pages 31-51, October.
    17. Cailin Li & Yue Wang & Baoyun Guo & Yihui Lu & Na Sun, 2024. "Street Community-Level Urban Flood Risk Assessment Based on Numerical Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-32, August.
    18. Pornpit Wongthongtham & Bilal Abu-Salih & Jeff Huang & Hemixa Patel & Komsun Siripun, 2023. "A Multi-Criteria Analysis Approach to Identify Flood Risk Asset Damage Hotspots in Western Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-30, March.
    19. Rui-Song Quan, 2014. "Rainstorm waterlogging risk assessment in central urban area of Shanghai based on multiple scenario simulation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(3), pages 1569-1585, September.
    20. Lin Lin & Zening Wu & Qiuhua Liang, 2019. "Urban flood susceptibility analysis using a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis framework," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(2), pages 455-475, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:109:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04882-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.