IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metrik/v82y2019i2d10.1007_s00184-018-0694-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Switching time of the standby component to the k-out-of-n:G system in the stress–strength setup

Author

Listed:
  • Zohreh Pakdaman

    (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

  • Jafar Ahmadi

    (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

Abstract

This paper deals with the reliability of a k-out-of-n:G system in the stress–strength setup with three different types (cold, warm or hot) of standby components. The switching time of the standby component to the k-out-of-n:G stress–strength system has been studied and how its effect on the stress–strength reliability and costs have been assessed. By taking into account the switching time of the standby component, some expressions for the stress–strength reliability and the mean remaining strength functions are obtained. The results for exponential and Weibull distributions are given in detail and the optimal time to activate the standby components to the working state is investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Zohreh Pakdaman & Jafar Ahmadi, 2019. "Switching time of the standby component to the k-out-of-n:G system in the stress–strength setup," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(2), pages 225-248, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:82:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s00184-018-0694-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s00184-018-0694-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00184-018-0694-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00184-018-0694-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eryilmaz, Serkan, 2012. "On the mean residual life of a k-out-of-n:G system with a single cold standby component," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 273-277.
    2. Li, Xiaohu & Hu, Xiaoxiao, 2008. "Some new stochastic comparisons for redundancy allocations in series and parallel systems," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(18), pages 3388-3394, December.
    3. Yun, Won Young & Cha, Ji Hwan, 2010. "Optimal design of a general warm standby system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 880-886.
    4. Finkelstein, Maxim, 2007. "On statistical and information-based virtual age of degrading systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(5), pages 676-681.
    5. Zhao, Peng & Zhang, Yiying & Chen, Jianbin, 2017. "Optimal allocation policy of one redundancy in a n-component series system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 656-668.
    6. Nil Kamal Hazra & Asok K. Nanda, 2017. "General standby allocation in series and parallel systems," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(19), pages 9842-9858, October.
    7. Xiaohu Li & Zhengcheng Zhang & Yudan Wu, 2009. "Some new results involving general standby systems," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 632-642, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bai, Senyang & Jia, Xiang & Cheng, Zhijun & Guo, Bo, 2021. "Operation strategy optimization for on-orbit satellite subsystems considering multiple active switching," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Kayid & Mashael A. Alshehri, 2023. "Stochastic Comparisons of Lifetimes of Used Standby Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Peng Zhao & Ping Shing Chan & Long Li & Hon Keung Tony Ng, 2013. "Allocation of two redundancies in two‐component series systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(7), pages 588-598, October.
    3. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2022. "Optimal preventive switching of components in degrading systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    4. Rui Fang & Xiaohu Li, 2017. "On matched active redundancy allocation for coherent systems with statistically dependent component lifetimes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(7), pages 580-598, October.
    5. Xiaohu Li & Zhengcheng Zhang & Yudan Wu, 2009. "Some new results involving general standby systems," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 632-642, September.
    6. Kundu, Pradip & Hazra, Nil Kamal & Nanda, Asok K., 2016. "Reliability study of a coherent system with single general standby component," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 25-33.
    7. Xiaoyu Zhang & Yiying Zhang & Rui Fang, 2020. "Allocations of cold standbys to series and parallel systems with dependent components," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 432-451, May.
    8. Li, Xiaohu & Fang, Rui & Mi, Jie, 2015. "On the timing to switch on the standby in k-out-of-n:G redundant systems," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 10-20.
    9. Jia, Xiang & Chen, Hao & Cheng, Zhijun & Guo, Bo, 2016. "A comparison between two switching policies for two-unit standby system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 109-118.
    10. Gupta, Nitin & Misra, Neeraj & Kumar, Somesh, 2015. "Stochastic comparisons of residual lifetimes and inactivity times of coherent systems with dependent identically distributed components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 425-430.
    11. Navarro, Jorge & Arriaza, Antonio & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2019. "Minimal repair of failed components in coherent systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 951-964.
    12. Zarezadeh, S. & Asadi, M. & Balakrishnan, N., 2014. "Dynamic network reliability modeling under nonhomogeneous Poisson processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 561-571.
    13. Jørgen Vitting Andersen & Roy Cerqueti & Giulia Rotundo, 2017. "Rational expectations and stochastic systems," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 17060, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Oct 2019.
    14. Ling, Xiaoliang & Wei, Yinzhao & Si, Shubin, 2019. "Reliability optimization of k-out-of-n system with random selection of allocative components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 186-193.
    15. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Dai, Yuanshun, 2018. "Optimizing availability of heterogeneous standby systems exposed to shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 137-145.
    16. Jorgen Vitting Andersen & Roy Cerqueti & Jessica Riccioni, 2021. "Rational expectations as a tool for predicting failure of weighted k-out-of-n reliability systems," Papers 2112.10672, arXiv.org.
    17. Finkelstein, Maxim, 2009. "Virtual age of non-repairable objects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 666-669.
    18. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2022. "Heterogeneous 1-out-of-n standby systems with limited unit operation time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    19. Zhang, Nan & Fouladirad, Mitra & Barros, Anne, 2019. "Reliability-based measures and prognostic analysis of a K-out-of-N system in a random environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 1120-1131.
    20. Shuming Wang & Yan-Fu Li & Tong Jia, 2020. "Distributionally Robust Design for Redundancy Allocation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 620-640, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:82:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s00184-018-0694-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.