IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v240y2015i2p425-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stochastic comparisons of residual lifetimes and inactivity times of coherent systems with dependent identically distributed components

Author

Listed:
  • Gupta, Nitin
  • Misra, Neeraj
  • Kumar, Somesh

Abstract

In this paper we compare the residual lifetime of a used coherent system of age t>0 with the lifetime of the similar coherent system made up of used components of age t. Here ‘similar’ means that the system has the same structure and the component lifetimes have the same dependence (joint reliability copula). Some comparison results are obtained for the likelihood ratio order, failure rate order, reversed failure rate order and the usual stochastic order. Similar results are reported for comparing inactivity time of a coherent system with lifetime of similar coherent system having component lifetimes same as inactivity times of failed components.

Suggested Citation

  • Gupta, Nitin & Misra, Neeraj & Kumar, Somesh, 2015. "Stochastic comparisons of residual lifetimes and inactivity times of coherent systems with dependent identically distributed components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 425-430.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:240:y:2015:i:2:p:425-430
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221714005840
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Navarro, Jorge & Rychlik, Tomasz, 2010. "Comparisons and bounds for expected lifetimes of reliability systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 309-317, November.
    2. Eryilmaz, Serkan, 2012. "On the mean residual life of a k-out-of-n:G system with a single cold standby component," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 273-277.
    3. Wang, Shaun S. & Young, Virginia R., 1998. "Ordering risks: Expected utility theory versus Yaari's dual theory of risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 145-161, June.
    4. Denneberg, Dieter, 1990. "Premium Calculation: Why Standard Deviation Should be Replaced by Absolute Deviation1," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 181-190, November.
    5. Wang, Shaun, 1996. "Premium Calculation by Transforming the Layer Premium Density," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 71-92, May.
    6. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2011. "Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Quiggin, John, 1982. "A theory of anticipated utility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 323-343, December.
    8. Navarro, Jorge & Spizzichino, Fabio, 2010. "On the relationships between copulas of order statistics and marginal distributions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(5-6), pages 473-479, March.
    9. Sordo, Miguel A. & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2011. "Stochastic comparisons of distorted variability measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 11-17, July.
    10. Navarro, Jorge & Pellerey, Franco & Di Crescenzo, Antonio, 2015. "Orderings of coherent systems with randomized dependent components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 127-139.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jorge Navarro, 2018. "Distribution-free comparisons of residual lifetimes of coherent systems based on copula properties," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 781-800, June.
    2. Jorgen Vitting Andersen & Roy Cerqueti & Jessica Riccioni, 2021. "Rational expectations as a tool for predicting failure of weighted k-out-of-n reliability systems," Papers 2112.10672, arXiv.org.
    3. Mhamed Mesfioui & Mohamed Kayid, 2021. "Residual Probability Function for Dependent Lifetimes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Zarezadeh, S. & Mohammadi, L. & Balakrishnan, N., 2018. "On the joint signature of several coherent systems with some shared components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 1092-1100.
    5. Parsa, Motahareh & Di Crescenzo, Antonio & Jabbari, Hadi, 2018. "Analysis of reliability systems via Gini-type index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 340-353.
    6. Chen Li & Xiaohu Li, 2020. "Weak aging properties for coherent systems with statistically dependent component lifetimes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(7), pages 559-572, October.
    7. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Aliee, Hananeh & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2016. "A new time-independent reliability importance measure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 427-442.
    8. Jørgen Vitting Andersen & Roy Cerqueti & Jessica Riccioni, 2023. "Rational expectations as a tool for predicting failure of weighted k-out-of-n reliability systems," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-03634370, HAL.
    9. Jørgen Vitting Andersen & Roy Cerqueti & Jessica Riccioni, 2023. "Rational expectations as a tool for predicting failure of weighted k-out-of-n reliability systems," Post-Print hal-03634370, HAL.
    10. Jørgen Vitting Andersen & Roy Cerqueti & Giulia Rotundo, 2017. "Rational expectations and stochastic systems," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 17060, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Oct 2019.
    11. Rychlik, Tomasz, 2017. "Evaluations of quantiles of system lifetime distributions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 935-944.
    12. Zhu, Xiaojun & Balakrishnan, N., 2023. "Non-parametric inference based on reliability life-test of non-identical coherent systems with application to warranty time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Salehi, Ebrahim & Tavangar, Mahdi, 2019. "Stochastic comparisons on conditional residual lifetime and inactivity time of coherent systems with exchangeable components," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 327-337.
    14. Jorgen-Vitting Andersen & Roy Cerqueti & Jessica Riccioni, 2023. "Rational expectations as a tool for predicting failure of weighted k-out-of-n reliability systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(1), pages 295-316, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge Navarro & Yolanda Águila & Miguel A. Sordo & Alfonso Suárez-Llorens, 2016. "Preservation of Stochastic Orders under the Formation of Generalized Distorted Distributions. Applications to Coherent Systems," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 529-545, June.
    2. Miguel Sordo & Jorge Navarro & José Sarabia, 2014. "Distorted Lorenz curves: models and comparisons," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(4), pages 761-780, April.
    3. Francesca Greselin & Ričardas Zitikis, 2018. "From the Classical Gini Index of Income Inequality to a New Zenga-Type Relative Measure of Risk: A Modeller’s Perspective," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Greselin, Francesca & Zitikis, Ricardas, 2015. "Measuring economic inequality and risk: a unifying approach based on personal gambles, societal preferences and references," MPRA Paper 65892, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. López-Díaz, Miguel & Sordo, Miguel A. & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2012. "On the Lp-metric between a probability distribution and its distortion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 257-264.
    6. Belzunce, Félix & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso & Sordo, Miguel A., 2012. "Comparison of increasing directionally convex transformations of random vectors with a common copula," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 385-390.
    7. Belles-Sampera, Jaume & Merigó, José M. & Guillén, Montserrat & Santolino, Miguel, 2013. "The connection between distortion risk measures and ordered weighted averaging operators," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 411-420.
    8. Xiaoqing Liang & Ruodu Wang & Virginia Young, 2021. "Optimal Insurance to Maximize RDEU Under a Distortion-Deviation Premium Principle," Papers 2107.02656, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    9. repec:bpj:demode:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:156-177:n:10 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Grigorova Miryana, 2014. "Stochastic orderings with respect to a capacity and an application to a financial optimization problem," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 31(2), pages 1-31, June.
    11. Sordo, Miguel A. & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2011. "Stochastic comparisons of distorted variability measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 11-17, July.
    12. Miryana Grigorova, 2011. "Stochastic dominance with respect to a capacity and risk measures," Working Papers hal-00639667, HAL.
    13. Wei Wang & Huifu Xu, 2023. "Preference robust state-dependent distortion risk measure on act space and its application in optimal decision making," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-51, December.
    14. Grigorova Miryana, 2014. "Stochastic dominance with respect to a capacity and risk measures," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 31(3-4), pages 1-37, December.
    15. Sainan Zhang & Huifu Xu, 2022. "Insurance premium-based shortfall risk measure induced by cumulative prospect theory," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 703-738, October.
    16. Sordo, Miguel A. & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso & Bello, Alfonso J., 2015. "Comparison of conditional distributions in portfolios of dependent risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 62-69.
    17. Navarro, Jorge & Arriaza, Antonio & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2019. "Minimal repair of failed components in coherent systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 951-964.
    18. Zarezadeh, S. & Asadi, M. & Balakrishnan, N., 2014. "Dynamic network reliability modeling under nonhomogeneous Poisson processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 561-571.
    19. Jørgen Vitting Andersen & Roy Cerqueti & Giulia Rotundo, 2017. "Rational expectations and stochastic systems," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 17060, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Oct 2019.
    20. Leitner, Johannes, 2005. "Dilatation monotonous Choquet integrals," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 994-1006, December.
    21. Kaluszka, M. & Laeven, R.J.A. & Okolewski, A., 2012. "A note on weighted premium calculation principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 379-381.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:240:y:2015:i:2:p:425-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.