IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metcap/v26y2024i1d10.1007_s11009-024-10077-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Survival of Coherent Systems Subject to Random Shocks

Author

Listed:
  • Dheeraj Goyal

    (Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur)

  • Nil Kamal Hazra

    (Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur
    Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur)

  • Maxim Finkelstein

    (University of the Free State
    University of Strathclyde)

Abstract

We consider coherent systems subject to random shocks that can damage a random number of components of a system. Based on the distribution of the number of failed components, we discuss three models, namely, (i) a shock can damage any number of components (including zero) with the same probability, (ii) each shock damages, at least, one component, and (iii) a shock can damage, at most, one component. Shocks arrival times are modeled using three important counting processes, namely, the Poisson generalized gamma process, the Poisson phase-type process and the renewal process with matrix Mittag-Leffler distributed inter-arrival times. For the defined shock models, we discuss relevant reliability properties of coherent systems. An optimal replacement policy for repairable systems is considered as an application of the proposed modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Dheeraj Goyal & Nil Kamal Hazra & Maxim Finkelstein, 2024. "On Survival of Coherent Systems Subject to Random Shocks," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-29, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:26:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11009-024-10077-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11009-024-10077-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11009-024-10077-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11009-024-10077-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Xianzhen & Jin, Sujun & He, Xuefeng & He, David, 2019. "Reliability analysis of coherent systems subject to internal failures and external shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 75-83.
    2. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2016. "New shock models based on the generalized Polya process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 135-141.
    3. Dheeraj Goyal & Nil Kamal Hazra & Maxim Finkelstein, 2022. "On the general $$\delta $$ δ -shock model," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(4), pages 994-1029, December.
    4. Francisco J. Samaniego, 2007. "System Signatures and their Applications in Engineering Reliability," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-71797-5, July-Dece.
    5. Eryilmaz, Serkan & Devrim, Yilser, 2019. "Reliability and optimal replacement policy for a k-out-of-n system subject to shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 393-397.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dheeraj Goyal & Nil Kamal Hazra & Maxim Finkelstein, 2023. "A general class of shock models with dependent inter-arrival times," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(3), pages 1079-1105, September.
    2. Tavangar, Mahdi & Hashemi, Marzieh, 2022. "Reliability and maintenance analysis of coherent systems subject to aging and environmental shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    3. Eryilmaz, Serkan, 2020. "Age-based preventive maintenance for coherent systems with applications to consecutive-k-out-of-n and related systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    4. Chadjiconstantinidis, Stathis & Eryilmaz, Serkan, 2023. "Reliability of a mixed δ-shock model with a random change point in shock magnitude distribution and an optimal replacement policy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    5. Eryilmaz, Serkan & Kan, Cihangir, 2019. "Reliability and optimal replacement policy for an extreme shock model with a change point," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Gaofeng Da & Lvyu Xia & Taizhong Hu, 2014. "On Computing Signatures of k-out-of-n Systems Consisting of Modules," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 223-233, March.
    7. Zarezadeh, S. & Mohammadi, L. & Balakrishnan, N., 2018. "On the joint signature of several coherent systems with some shared components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 1092-1100.
    8. Lina Bian & Bo Peng & Yong Ye, 2023. "Reliability Analysis and Optimal Replacement Policy for Systems with Generalized Pólya Censored δ Shock Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Hindolo George-Williams & Geng Feng & Frank PA Coolen & Michael Beer & Edoardo Patelli, 2019. "Extending the survival signature paradigm to complex systems with non-repairable dependent failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 505-519, August.
    10. Zhengcheng Zhang & N. Balakrishnan, 2016. "Representations of the inactivity time for coherent systems with heterogeneous components and some ordered properties," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 113-126, January.
    11. Cha, Ji Hwan, 2019. "Poisson Lindley process and its main properties," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 74-81.
    12. Marichal, Jean-Luc & Mathonet, Pierre & Spizzichino, Fabio, 2015. "On modular decompositions of system signatures," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 19-32.
    13. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2022. "Optimal sequencing of elements activation in 1-out-of-n warm standby system with storage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Coolen, Frank P.A. & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2015. "Predictive inference for system reliability after common-cause component failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 27-33.
    15. Nabakumar Jana & Samadrita Bera, 2024. "Estimation of multicomponent system reliability for inverse Weibull distribution using survival signature," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(8), pages 5077-5108, October.
    16. Marichal, Jean-Luc & Mathonet, Pierre, 2013. "On the extensions of Barlow–Proschan importance index and system signature to dependent lifetimes," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 48-56.
    17. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2020. "Is perfect repair always perfect?," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 90-104, March.
    18. Patelli, Edoardo & Feng, Geng & Coolen, Frank P.A. & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2017. "Simulation methods for system reliability using the survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 327-337.
    19. Di Maio, Francesco & Pettorossi, Chiara & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Entropy-driven Monte Carlo simulation method for approximating the survival signature of complex infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    20. S Eryilmaz, 2010. "Review of recent advances in reliability of consecutive k-out-of-n and related systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 224(3), pages 225-237, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:26:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11009-024-10077-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.