IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/masfgc/v26y2021i1d10.1007_s11027-021-09941-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contribution of Cedrus deodara forests for climate mitigation along altitudinal gradient in Garhwal Himalaya, India

Author

Listed:
  • Mehraj A. Sheikh

    (HNB Garhwal University, (A Central University))

  • Munesh Kumar

    (HNB Garhwal University, (A Central University))

  • N. P. Todaria

    (HNB Garhwal University, (A Central University))

  • Jahangeer A. Bhat

    (Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University)

  • Amit Kumar

    (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)

  • Rajiv Pandey

    (Forest Research Institute)

Abstract

The climatic and non-climatic stresses impacted adversely to the functioning and productivity of the forests, resulting in disturbing the existing carbon flow in the atmosphere. Cedrus deodara occurs in pure forest stands throughout the Western Himalayas and has high biomass and soil carbon sequestration potential. The present study aims to provide the contribution of the Cedrus deodara forests under the current stresses for climate mitigation by analysing the three elevation ranges of the Dhanaulti forest division of Garhwal Himalaya, India. The results report that soil organic carbon (SOC) was adversely and bulk density favourably related with elevation. Moreover, SOC as CO2eq also decreased significantly with an increase in soil depths. Biomass carbon for various parts of the plant was also estimated for the three elevations of the Cedrus deodara forests. The trend in total carbon stock (bole, branch, twig, foliage and soil) decreased significantly with an increase in altitude. The carbon stock of Cedrus deodara forests was maximum (545 t ha−1) at upper altitude (2350 m.a.s.l) and minimum (330 t ha−1) at a lower altitude (2050 m.a.s.l). The difference in litter production between the seasons is significant with maximum production in summer followed by rainy and winter seasons. This study provides inputs for greenhouse gas (GHG) estimation for national communication to various platforms. The information on the soil is crucial for understanding about the ecology of the forests assisting prediction of functioning and productivity of forests.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehraj A. Sheikh & Munesh Kumar & N. P. Todaria & Jahangeer A. Bhat & Amit Kumar & Rajiv Pandey, 2021. "Contribution of Cedrus deodara forests for climate mitigation along altitudinal gradient in Garhwal Himalaya, India," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:26:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11027-021-09941-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-021-09941-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-021-09941-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11027-021-09941-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. A. Houghton & Brett Byers & Alexander A. Nassikas, 2015. "A role for tropical forests in stabilizing atmospheric CO2," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1022-1023, December.
    2. Brendan Mackey & Cyril F. Kormos & Heather Keith & William R. Moomaw & Richard A. Houghton & Russell A. Mittermeier & David Hole & Sonia Hugh, 2020. "Understanding the importance of primary tropical forest protection as a mitigation strategy," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 763-787, May.
    3. Munesh Kumar & Amit Kumar & Rahul Kumar & Bobbymoore Konsam & Nazir A. Pala & Jahangeer A. Bhat, 2021. "Carbon stock potential in Pinus roxburghii forests of Indian Himalayan regions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12463-12478, August.
    4. Brendan Mackey & Cyril F. Kormos & Heather Keith & William R. Moomaw & Richard A. Houghton & Russell A. Mittermeier & David Hole & Sonia Hugh, 0. "Understanding the importance of primary tropical forest protection as a mitigation strategy," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 763-787.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silvina M. Manrique & Judith Franco, 2020. "Tree cover increase mitigation strategy: implications of the “replacement approach” in carbon storage of a subtropical ecosystem," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 1481-1508, December.
    2. Sebastian Gräfe & Michael Köhl, 2020. "Impacts of Future Crop Tree Release Treatments on Forest Carbon as REDD+ Mitigation Benefits," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Coomes, Oliver T. & Cheng, Yuanyu & Takasaki, Yoshito & Abizaid, Christian, 2021. "What drives clearing of old-growth forest over secondary forests in tropical shifting cultivation systems? Evidence from the Peruvian Amazon," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Morgan, Edward A. & Buckwell, Andrew & Guidi, Caterina & Garcia, Beatriz & Rimmer, Lawrence & Cadman, Tim & Mackey, Brendan, 2022. "Capturing multiple forest ecosystem services for just benefit sharing: The Basket of Benefits Approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    5. Edward A. Morgan & Glenn Bush & Joseph Zambo Mandea & Melaine Kermarc & Brendan Mackey, 2022. "Comparing Community Needs and REDD+ Activities for Capacity Building and Forest Protection in the Équateur Province of the Democratic Republic of Congo," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Chloe Margaret Papier & Helen Mills Poulos & Alejandro Kusch, 2019. "Invasive species and carbon flux: the case of invasive beavers (Castor canadensis) in riparian Nothofagus forests of Tierra del Fuego, Chile," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 219-234, March.
    7. M.J. Mace & Claire L. Fyson & Michiel Schaeffer & William L. Hare, 2021. "Large‐Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal to Meet the 1.5°C Limit: Key Governance Gaps, Challenges and Priority Responses," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S1), pages 67-81, April.
    8. Bronson W Griscom & Peter W Ellis & Alessandro Baccini & Delon Marthinus & Jeffrey S Evans & Ruslandi, 2016. "Synthesizing Global and Local Datasets to Estimate Jurisdictional Forest Carbon Fluxes in Berau, Indonesia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Manes, Stella & Vale, Mariana M. & Malecha, Artur & Pires, Aliny P.F., 2022. "Nature-based solutions promote climate change adaptation safeguarding ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    10. Aryal, Kishor & Awasthi, Nripesh & Maraseni, Tek & Laudari, Hari Krishna & Gotame, Pabitra & Bist, Dhan Bahadur, 2023. "Calibrating Nepal's scientific forest management practices in the measure of forest restoration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    11. Benjamin K. Sovacool & Chad M. Baum & Sean Low, 2022. "Determining our climate policy future: expert opinions about negative emissions and solar radiation management pathways," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 1-50, December.
    12. Federico E. Alice‐Guier & Frits Mohren & Pieter A. Zuidema, 2020. "The life cycle carbon balance of selective logging in tropical forests of Costa Rica," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(3), pages 534-547, June.
    13. Beverly E. Law & William R. Moomaw & Tara W. Hudiburg & William H. Schlesinger & John D. Sterman & George M. Woodwell, 2022. "Creating Strategic Reserves to Protect Forest Carbon and Reduce Biodiversity Losses in the United States," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Maarten van der Eynden & Henrik Fliflet & Per Fredrik Ilsaas Pharo & Hege Ragnhildstveit & Snorre Tønset, 2017. "Lazy thinking, lazy giving—or lazy research?," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 20(4), pages 360-363, December.
    15. Venn, Tyron J., 2023. "Reconciling timber harvesting, biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration in Queensland, Australia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Becken, Susanne & Mackey, Brendan, 2017. "What role for offsetting aviation greenhouse gas emissions in a deep-cut carbon world?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 71-83.
    17. Prakash Rai & Vineeta & Gopal Shukla & Abha Manohar K & Jahangeer A Bhat & Amit Kumar & Munesh Kumar & Marina Cabral-Pinto & Sumit Chakravarty, 2021. "Carbon Storage of Single Tree and Mixed Tree Dominant Species Stands in a Reserve Forest—Case Study of the Eastern Sub-Himalayan Region of India," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Kate Dooley & Sivan Kartha, 2018. "Land-based negative emissions: risks for climate mitigation and impacts on sustainable development," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 79-98, February.
    19. Morgan, Edward A. & Osborne, Natalie & Mackey, Brendan, 2022. "Evaluating planning without plans: Principles, criteria and indicators for effective forest landscape approaches," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    20. Mykola Gusti & Nicklas Forsell & Petr Havlik & Nikolay Khabarov & Florian Kraxner & Michael Obersteiner, 2019. "The sensitivity of the costs of reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) to future socioeconomic drivers and its implications for mitigation policy design," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1123-1141, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:26:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11027-021-09941-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.