IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/josatr/v10y2025i1d10.1186_s41072-024-00190-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What could make seaports more committed to air quality? A qualitative content analysis of key barriers, drivers, and enablers

Author

Listed:
  • Flóra Zsuzsanna Gulyás

    (Institute for Shipping Economics and Logistics
    University of Bremen, Professorship of Global Supply Chain Management)

  • Aseem Kinra

    (Institute for Shipping Economics and Logistics
    Heriot-Watt University)

Abstract

Background There is a growing need for seaports to find ways to reduce the air pollution they generate. A wide range of potential best practices exist, but what lies behind the decision to implement them? Prior studies have focused on either barriers, drivers, or enablers in this context. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to review existing research on various measures to reduce air pollution in seaports with the aspects of both barriers and enablers that influence the implementation of these actions. Methods To answer the research question, the authors conducted a systematic literature review using the databases of Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus. The initial search identified 247 studies in WoS and 589 studies in Scopus. After applying exclusion and inclusion criteria, a qualitative content analysis (QCA) was performed to narrow down the resulting articles and extract relevant information. The identified factors were then categorized, followed by a factor frequency analysis (FFA). Results Based on the final selection of 48 research articles, the review identified and categorized a total of 38 barriers and 28 enabling factors. The barriers were grouped into economic, technical, managerial, informational, and regulatory categories. The enabling factors were grouped into economic-financial, regulations and policies, informational, professional, and training categories. Aspects of finance and regulation are highlighted by the FFA. Findings Financial aspects play a crucial role on both the barriers and enablers side, while aspects such as information or professional training seem to be neglected. Barriers are diverse, while enablers focus mostly on regulations. With our findings, we contribute to previous work that will serve as a basis for further research on the interdependencies of influencing factors, as well as experts and stakeholders in developing suitable emission reduction (ER) strategies for citizens living and working in and around seaports. The ranking of importance as well as the degree of influence of the various factors depend on further aspects to be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Flóra Zsuzsanna Gulyás & Aseem Kinra, 2025. "What could make seaports more committed to air quality? A qualitative content analysis of key barriers, drivers, and enablers," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:10:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-024-00190-z
    DOI: 10.1186/s41072-024-00190-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s41072-024-00190-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s41072-024-00190-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Winkel, R. & Weddige, U. & Johnsen, D. & Hoen, V. & Papaefthimiou, S., 2016. "Shore Side Electricity in Europe: Potential and environmental benefits," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 584-593.
    2. Alexandre Bohas & Michael J. Morley & Aseem Kinra, 2021. "Perlmutter revisited: Revealing the anomic mindset," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(9), pages 1695-1723, December.
    3. Zhen, Lu & Wang, Wencheng & Lin, Shumin, 2022. "Analytical comparison on two incentive policies for shore power equipped ships in berthing activities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Mehrnaz Ashrafi & Tony R. Walker & Gregory M. Magnan & Michelle Adams & Michele Acciaro, 2020. "A review of corporate sustainability drivers in maritime ports: a multi-stakeholder perspective," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1027-1044, November.
    5. Daxin Dong & Xiaowei Xu & Wen Xu & Junye Xie, 2019. "The Relationship Between the Actual Level of Air Pollution and Residents’ Concern about Air Pollution: Evidence from Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Yuyan Zhou & Yan Zhang & Dong Ma & Jun Lu & Wenbin Luo & Yu Fu & Shanshan Li & Junlan Feng & Cheng Huang & Wangqi Ge & Hong Zhu, 2020. "Port-Related Emissions, Environmental Impacts and Their Implication on Green Traffic Policy in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Mary M. Crossan & Marina Apaydin, 2010. "A Multi‐Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1154-1191, September.
    8. Daozhi Zhao & Tianyi Wang & Hongshuai Han, 2020. "Approach towards Sustainable and Smart Coal Port Development: The Case of Huanghua Port in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Sonja Dreyer & Daniel Olivotti & Benedikt Lebek & Michael H. Breitner, 2019. "Focusing the customer through smart services: a literature review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(1), pages 55-78, March.
    10. Miluše Tichavska & Beatriz Tovar, 2017. "External costs from vessel emissions at port: a review of the methodological and empirical state of the art," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 383-402, May.
    11. Zhuo Chen & Myongsop Pak, 2017. "A Delphi analysis on green performance evaluation indices for ports in China," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 537-550, July.
    12. Molavi, Anahita & Lim, Gino J. & Shi, Jian, 2020. "Stimulating sustainable energy at maritime ports by hybrid economic incentives: A bilevel optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    13. Anas S. Alamoush & Dimitrios Dalaklis & Fabio Ballini & Aykut I. Ölcer, 2023. "Consolidating Port Decarbonisation Implementation: Concept, Pathways, Barriers, Solutions, and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-28, September.
    14. Tichavska, Miluše & Tovar, Beatriz & Gritsenko, Daria & Johansson, Lasse & Jalkanen, Jukka Pekka, 2019. "Air emissions from ships in port: Does regulation make a difference?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 128-140.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jinggai & Li, Huanhuan & Yang, Zaili & Ge, Ying-En, 2024. "Shore power for reduction of shipping emission in port: A bibliometric analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Chun-Yu Lin & Gui-Lin Dai & Su Wang & Xiu-Mei Fu, 2022. "The Evolution of Green Port Research: A Knowledge Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Chandra Prakash Garg & Vishal Kashav & Xuemuge Wang, 2023. "Evaluating sustainability factors of green ports in China under fuzzy environment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7795-7821, August.
    4. Tran Thi Nguyet Minh & Hanh-Thi Hong Hoang & Hyung Sik Nam & Anas S. Alamoush & Phan Anh Duong, 2025. "Revisiting Port Decarbonization for Advancing a Sustainable Maritime Industry: Insights from Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-36, May.
    5. Alamoush, Anas S. & Ballini, Fabio & Ölçer, Aykut I., 2024. "Management of stakeholders engaged in port energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Wang, Lifen & Liang, Chengji & Shi, Jian & Molavi, Anahita & Lim, Gino & Zhang, Yue, 2021. "A bilevel hybrid economic approach for optimal deployment of onshore power supply in maritime ports," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Jon Williamsson & Nicole Costa & Vendela Santén & Sara Rogerson, 2022. "Barriers and Drivers to the Implementation of Onshore Power Supply—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Zhang, Yue & Liang, Chengji & Shi, Jian & Lim, Gino & Wu, Yiwei, 2022. "Optimal Port Microgrid Scheduling Incorporating Onshore Power Supply and Berth Allocation Under Uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    9. Alaa Othman & Sara El-gazzar & Matjaz Knez, 2022. "A Framework for Adopting a Sustainable Smart Sea Port Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, April.
    10. Stolz, B. & Held, M. & Georges, G. & Boulouchos, K., 2021. "The CO2 reduction potential of shore-side electricity in Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    11. Saz-Salazar, Salvador del & Tovar, Beatriz, 2024. "On ferry users’ willingness to pay for improving environmental quality: A case study for the Canary Islands," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 61-72.
    12. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    13. Xiaofang Wu & Zhi Huang, 2024. "Estimating the costs and external benefits of reducing shipping-induced air pollution: a case study of Xiamen Harbour, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28785-28808, November.
    14. Mariann Veresné Somosi & Krisztina Varga & György Kocziszky, 2019. "Step by Step for Social Innovation with Neuro-Fuzzy Modelling," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, ejes_v5_i.
    15. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    16. Spaniol, Matthew J. & Rowland, Nicholas J., 2022. "Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Xinxin Liu & Nan Li & Feng Liu & Hailin Mu & Longxi Li & Xiaoyu Liu, 2021. "Optimal Design on Fossil-to-Renewable Energy Transition of Regional Integrated Energy Systems under CO 2 Emission Abatement Control: A Case Study in Dalian, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    18. Bentivoglio, Deborah & Bucci, Giorgia & Belletti, Matteo & Finco, Adele, 2022. "A theoretical framework on network’s dynamics for precision agriculture technologies adoption," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(4), January.
    19. Silvia Cosimato & Roberto Vona, 2021. "Digital Innovation for the Sustainability of Reshoring Strategies: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-16, July.
    20. van den Broek, Tijs & van Veenstra, Anne Fleur, 2018. "Governance of big data collaborations: How to balance regulatory compliance and disruptive innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 330-338.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:10:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-024-00190-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.