IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v200y2024i3d10.1007_s10957-023-02347-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geometric Programming Problems with Triangular and Trapezoidal Twofold Uncertainty Distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Tapas Mondal

    (Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar)

  • Akshay Kumar Ojha

    (Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar)

  • Sabyasachi Pani

    (Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar)

Abstract

Geometric programming is a well-known optimization tool for dealing with a wide range of nonlinear optimization and engineering problems. In general, it is assumed that the parameters of a geometric programming problem are deterministic and accurate. However, in the real-world geometric programming problem, the parameters are frequently inaccurate and ambiguous. To tackle the ambiguity, this paper investigates the geometric programming problem in an uncertain environment, with the coefficients as triangular and trapezoidal twofold uncertain variables. In this paper, we introduce uncertain measures in a generalized version and focus on more complicated twofold uncertainties to propose triangular and trapezoidal twofold uncertain variables within the context of uncertainty theory. We develop three reduction methods to convert triangular and trapezoidal twofold uncertain variables into singlefold uncertain variables using optimistic, pessimistic, and expected value criteria. Reduction methods are used to convert the geometric programming problem with twofold uncertainty into the geometric programming problem with singlefold uncertainty. Furthermore, the chance-constrained uncertain-based framework is used to solve the reduced singlefold uncertain geometric programming problem. Finally, a numerical example is provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Tapas Mondal & Akshay Kumar Ojha & Sabyasachi Pani, 2024. "Geometric Programming Problems with Triangular and Trapezoidal Twofold Uncertainty Distributions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 200(3), pages 978-1016, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:200:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-023-02347-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-023-02347-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-023-02347-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-023-02347-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belleh Fontem, 2023. "Robust Chance-Constrained Geometric Programming with Application to Demand Risk Mitigation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 197(2), pages 765-797, May.
    2. Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2006. "Posynomial geometric programming with parametric uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 345-353, January.
    3. Thomas Wayne Wall & Doran Greening & R. E. D. Woolsey, 1986. "OR Practice—Solving Complex Chemical Equilibria Using a Geometric-Programming Based Technique," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 345-355, June.
    4. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2018. "Integrating geometric programming with rough set theory," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-32, April.
    5. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Debora Di Caprio & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2016. "Solving Geometric Programming Problems with Normal, Linear and Zigzag Uncertainty Distributions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 243-265, July.
    6. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Hirofumi Fukuyama & Debora Di Caprio, 2017. "Fuzzy chance-constrained geometric programming: the possibility, necessity and credibility approaches," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 67-97, April.
    7. Roy, T.K. & Maiti, M., 1997. "A fuzzy EOQ model with demand-dependent unit cost under limited storage capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 425-432, June.
    8. Jung, Hoon & Klein, Cerry M., 2001. "Optimal inventory policies under decreasing cost functions via geometric programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(3), pages 628-642, August.
    9. Fang, S. C. & Peterson, E. L. & Rajasekera, J. R., 1988. "Controlled dual perturbations for posynomial programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 111-117, April.
    10. Sinha, S. B. & Biswas, A. & Biswal, M. P., 1987. "Geometric programming problems with negative degrees of difficulty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 101-103, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rashed Khanjani-Shiraz & Salman Khodayifar & Panos M. Pardalos, 2021. "Copula theory approach to stochastic geometric programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 435-468, October.
    2. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Debora Di Caprio & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2016. "Solving Geometric Programming Problems with Normal, Linear and Zigzag Uncertainty Distributions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 243-265, July.
    3. Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2008. "Posynomial geometric programming with interval exponents and coefficients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 17-27, April.
    4. Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2006. "Posynomial geometric programming with parametric uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 345-353, January.
    5. Wasim Akram Mandal, 2021. "Weighted Tchebycheff Optimization Technique Under Uncertainty," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 709-731, December.
    6. Belleh Fontem, 2023. "Robust Chance-Constrained Geometric Programming with Application to Demand Risk Mitigation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 197(2), pages 765-797, May.
    7. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2018. "Integrating geometric programming with rough set theory," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-32, April.
    8. G. S. Mahapatra & T. K. Mandal, 2012. "Posynomial Parametric Geometric Programming with Interval Valued Coefficient," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 120-132, July.
    9. Wasim Akram Mandal & Sahidul Islam, 2017. "Multiobjective geometric programming problem under uncertainty," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 27(4), pages 85-109.
    10. Ashoke Kumar Bera & Dipak Kumar Jana, 2017. "Multi-item imperfect production inventory model in Bi-fuzzy environments," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(2), pages 260-282, June.
    11. Hao-Chun Lu & Liming Yao, 2019. "Efficient Convexification Strategy for Generalized Geometric Programming Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 226-234, April.
    12. Huang, Xiaoxia & Ma, Di & Choe, Kwang-Il, 2023. "Uncertain mean–variance portfolio model with inflation taking linear uncertainty distributions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 203-217.
    13. Yao, Jing-Shing & Chiang, Jershan, 2003. "Inventory without backorder with fuzzy total cost and fuzzy storing cost defuzzified by centroid and signed distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 401-409, July.
    14. Tingting Yang & Xiaoxia Huang, 2022. "A New Portfolio Optimization Model Under Tracking-Error Constraint with Linear Uncertainty Distributions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 195(2), pages 723-747, November.
    15. Jung-Fa Tsai & Ming-Hua Lin, 2011. "An Efficient Global Approach for Posynomial Geometric Programming Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 483-492, August.
    16. Henry Inegbedion* & Sunday Eze & Abiola Asaleye & Adedoyin Lawal, 2019. "Inventory Management and Organisational Efficiency," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(3), pages 756-763, 03-2019.
    17. Vijayan, T. & Kumaran, M., 2008. "Inventory models with a mixture of backorders and lost sales under fuzzy cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 105-119, August.
    18. Chakrabortty, Susovan & Pal, Madhumangal & Nayak, Prasun Kumar, 2013. "Intuitionistic fuzzy optimization technique for Pareto optimal solution of manufacturing inventory models with shortages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 381-387.
    19. Amritansu Ray & Sanat Kumar Majumder, 2018. "Multi objective mean–variance–skewness model with Burg’s entropy and fuzzy return for portfolio optimization," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(1), pages 107-133, March.
    20. Zhang, Chenglong & Li, Xuemin & Guo, Ping & Huo, Zailin, 2021. "Balancing irrigation planning and risk preference for sustainable irrigated agriculture: A fuzzy credibility-based optimization model with the Hurwicz criterion under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:200:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-023-02347-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.