IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v32y2021i8d10.1007_s10845-021-01785-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning to determine the main factors affecting creep rates in laser powder bed fusion

Author

Listed:
  • Salomé Sanchez

    (University of Nottingham)

  • Divish Rengasamy

    (University of Nottingham)

  • Christopher J. Hyde

    (University of Nottingham)

  • Grazziela P. Figueredo

    (University of Nottingham)

  • Benjamin Rothwell

    (University of Nottingham)

Abstract

There is an increasing need for the use of additive manufacturing (AM) to produce improved critical application engineering components. However, the materials manufactured using AM perform well below their traditionally manufactured counterparts, particularly for creep and fatigue. Research has shown that this difference in performance is due to the complex relationships between AM process parameters which affect the material microstructure and consequently the mechanical performance as well. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the impact of different AM build parameters on the mechanical performance of parts. Machine learning (ML) models are able to find hidden relationships in data using iterative statistical analyses and have the potential to develop process–structure–property–performance relationships for manufacturing processes, including AM. The aim of this work is to apply ML techniques to materials testing data in order to understand the effect of AM process parameters on the creep rate of additively built nickel-based superalloy and to predict the creep rate of the material from these process parameters. In this work, the predictive capabilities of ML and its ability to develop process–structure–property relationships are applied to the creep properties of laser powder bed fused alloy 718. The input data for the ML model included the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) build parameters used—build orientation, scan strategy and number of lasers—and geometrical material descriptors which were extracted from optical microscope porosity images using image analysis techniques. The ML model was used to predict the minimum creep rate of the Laser Powder Bed Fused alloy 718 samples, which had been creep tested at $$650\,^\circ $$ 650 ∘ C and 600 MPa. The ML model was also used to identify the most relevant material descriptors affecting the minimum creep rate of the material (determined by using an ensemble feature importance framework). The creep rate was accurately predicted with a percentage error of $$1.40\%$$ 1.40 % in the best case. The most important material descriptors were found to be part density, number of pores, build orientation and scan strategy. These findings show the applicability and potential of using ML to determine and predict the mechanical properties of materials fabricated via different manufacturing processes, and to find process–structure–property relationships in AM. This increases the readiness of AM for use in critical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Salomé Sanchez & Divish Rengasamy & Christopher J. Hyde & Grazziela P. Figueredo & Benjamin Rothwell, 2021. "Machine learning to determine the main factors affecting creep rates in laser powder bed fusion," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(8), pages 2353-2373, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:8:d:10.1007_s10845-021-01785-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-021-01785-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-021-01785-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-021-01785-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivanna Baturynska & Kristian Martinsen, 2021. "Prediction of geometry deviations in additive manufactured parts: comparison of linear regression with machine learning algorithms," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 179-200, January.
    2. Xiang Li & Xiaodong Jia & Qibo Yang & Jay Lee, 2020. "Quality analysis in metal additive manufacturing with deep learning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 2003-2017, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Zhang & Mutahar Safdar & Jiarui Xie & Jinghao Li & Manuel Sage & Yaoyao Fiona Zhao, 2023. "A systematic review on data of additive manufacturing for machine learning applications: the data quality, type, preprocessing, and management," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(8), pages 3305-3340, December.
    2. Jia Liu & Jiafeng Ye & Daniel Silva Izquierdo & Aleksandr Vinel & Nima Shamsaei & Shuai Shao, 2023. "A review of machine learning techniques for process and performance optimization in laser beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(8), pages 3249-3275, December.
    3. Chenglin Li & Baohai Wu & Zhao Zhang & Ying Zhang, 2023. "A novel process planning method of 3 + 2-axis additive manufacturing for aero-engine blade based on machine learning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 2027-2042, April.
    4. Hyunseop Park & Hyunwoong Ko & Yung-tsun Tina Lee & Shaw Feng & Paul Witherell & Hyunbo Cho, 2023. "Collaborative knowledge management to identify data analytics opportunities in additive manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 541-564, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ying Zhang & Mutahar Safdar & Jiarui Xie & Jinghao Li & Manuel Sage & Yaoyao Fiona Zhao, 2023. "A systematic review on data of additive manufacturing for machine learning applications: the data quality, type, preprocessing, and management," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(8), pages 3305-3340, December.
    2. Mohamed Ismail & Noha A. Mostafa & Ahmed El-assal, 2022. "Quality monitoring in multistage manufacturing systems by using machine learning techniques," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(8), pages 2471-2486, December.
    3. Bianca Maria Colosimo & Luca Pagani & Marco Grasso, 2024. "Modeling spatial point processes in video-imaging via Ripley’s K-function: an application to spatter analysis in additive manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 429-447, January.
    4. Nannan Xu & Xinze Cui & Xin Wang & Wei Zhang & Tianyu Zhao, 2022. "An Intelligent Athlete Signal Processing Methodology for Balance Control Ability Assessment with Multi-Headed Self-Attention Mechanism," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Aniket Nagargoje & Pavan Kumar Kankar & Prashant Kumar Jain & Puneet Tandon, 2023. "Application of artificial intelligence techniques in incremental forming: a state-of-the-art review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 985-1002, March.
    6. Nazanin Hosseini Arian & Alireza Pooya & Fariborz Rahimnia & Ali Sibevei, 2021. "Assessment the effect of rapid prototyping implementation on supply chain sustainability: a system dynamics approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 467-493, December.
    7. Zhaochen Gu & Shashank Sharma & Daniel A. Riley & Mangesh V. Pantawane & Sameehan S. Joshi & Song Fu & Narendra B. Dahotre, 2023. "A universal predictor-based machine learning model for optimal process maps in laser powder bed fusion process," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(8), pages 3341-3363, December.
    8. Yuwei Mao & Hui Lin & Christina Xuan Yu & Roger Frye & Darren Beckett & Kevin Anderson & Lars Jacquemetton & Fred Carter & Zhangyuan Gao & Wei-keng Liao & Alok N. Choudhary & Kornel Ehmann & Ankit Agr, 2023. "A deep learning framework for layer-wise porosity prediction in metal powder bed fusion using thermal signatures," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 315-329, January.
    9. Christian Kubik & Sebastian Michael Knauer & Peter Groche, 2022. "Smart sheet metal forming: importance of data acquisition, preprocessing and transformation on the performance of a multiclass support vector machine for predicting wear states during blanking," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 259-282, January.
    10. Matteo Bugatti & Bianca Maria Colosimo, 2022. "Towards real-time in-situ monitoring of hot-spot defects in L-PBF: a new classification-based method for fast video-imaging data analysis," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 293-309, January.
    11. Yanan Pan & Renke Kang & Zhigang Dong & Wenhao Du & Sen Yin & Yan Bao, 2022. "On-line prediction of ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting surface roughness of tungsten heavy alloy based on deep learning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 675-685, March.
    12. Minyoung Lee & Joohyoung Jeon & Hongchul Lee, 2022. "Explainable AI for domain experts: a post Hoc analysis of deep learning for defect classification of TFT–LCD panels," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 1747-1759, August.
    13. Yunhan Kim & Taekyum Kim & Byeng D. Youn & Sung-Hoon Ahn, 2022. "Machining quality monitoring (MQM) in laser-assisted micro-milling of glass using cutting force signals: an image-based deep transfer learning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 1813-1828, August.
    14. Jun-Qiang Wang & Yun-Lei Song & Peng-Hao Cui & Yang Li, 2023. "A data-driven method for performance analysis and improvement in production systems with quality inspection," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 455-469, February.
    15. Jinping Liu & Jie Wang & Xianfeng Liu & Tianyu Ma & Zhaohui Tang, 2022. "MWRSPCA: online fault monitoring based on moving window recursive sparse principal component analysis," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1255-1271, June.
    16. Omid Davtalab & Ali Kazemian & Xiao Yuan & Behrokh Khoshnevis, 2022. "Automated inspection in robotic additive manufacturing using deep learning for layer deformation detection," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 771-784, March.
    17. Yang, Yadong & Shahbeik, Hossein & Shafizadeh, Alireza & Masoudnia, Nima & Rafiee, Shahin & Zhang, Yijia & Pan, Junting & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza, 2022. "Biomass microwave pyrolysis characterization by machine learning for sustainable rural biorefineries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P2), pages 70-86.
    18. Hasan Tercan & Philipp Deibert & Tobias Meisen, 2022. "Continual learning of neural networks for quality prediction in production using memory aware synapses and weight transfer," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 283-292, January.
    19. Md Doulotuzzaman Xames & Fariha Kabir Torsha & Ferdous Sarwar, 2023. "A systematic literature review on recent trends of machine learning applications in additive manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 2529-2555, August.
    20. Michael D. T. McDonnell & Daniel Arnaldo & Etienne Pelletier & James A. Grant-Jacob & Matthew Praeger & Dimitris Karnakis & Robert W. Eason & Ben Mills, 2021. "Machine learning for multi-dimensional optimisation and predictive visualisation of laser machining," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1471-1483, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:8:d:10.1007_s10845-021-01785-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.