IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v32y2021i5d10.1007_s10845-020-01714-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-robot multi-operator collaborative assembly systems: a performance evaluation model

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Boschetti

    (University of Padova)

  • Matteo Bottin

    (University of Padova)

  • Maurizio Faccio

    (University of Padova)

  • Riccardo Minto

    (University of Padova)

Abstract

In the last decade, collaborative assembly systems (CAS) are becoming increasingly common due to their ability to merge the flexibility of a manual assembly system with the performance of traditional robotics. Technical constraints, e.g., dedicated tools or resources, or performance requirements, e.g., throughput, could encourage the use of a CAS built around a multi-robot and multi-operator layout, i.e., with a number of resources greater than 2. Starting from the development of a prototype multi-robot multi-operator collaborative workcell, a simulation environment was developed to evaluate the makespan and the degree of collaboration in multi-robot multi-operator CAS. From the simulation environment, a mathematical model was conceptualized. The presented model allows estimating, with a certain degree of accuracy, the performances of the system. The results have investigated how several process characteristics, i.e. the number and type of resources, the resources layout, the task allocation method, and the number of feeding devices, influence the degree of collaboration between the resources. Lastly, the authors propose a compact analytic formulation, based on an exponential function, and define the methods and the influence factors to determine its parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Boschetti & Matteo Bottin & Maurizio Faccio & Riccardo Minto, 2021. "Multi-robot multi-operator collaborative assembly systems: a performance evaluation model," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1455-1470, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01714-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01714-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-020-01714-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-020-01714-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D.-Y. Kim & J.-W. Park & S. Baek & K.-B. Park & H.-R. Kim & J.-I. Park & H.-S. Kim & B.-B. Kim & H.-Y. Oh & K. Namgung & W. Baek, 2020. "A modular factory testbed for the rapid reconfiguration of manufacturing systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 661-680, March.
    2. Timo Bänziger & Andreas Kunz & Konrad Wegener, 2020. "Optimizing human–robot task allocation using a simulation tool based on standardized work descriptions," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(7), pages 1635-1648, October.
    3. Abdelhamid Boudjelida, 2019. "On the robustness of joint production and maintenance scheduling in presence of uncertainties," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1515-1530, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hien Nguyen Ngoc & Ganix Lasa & Ion Iriarte, 2022. "Human-centred design in industry 4.0: case study review and opportunities for future research," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 35-76, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferreira, Cristiane & Figueira, Gonçalo & Amorim, Pedro, 2021. "Scheduling Human-Robot Teams in collaborative working cells," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Kyu Tae Park & Jinho Yang & Sang Do Noh, 2021. "VREDI: virtual representation for a digital twin application in a work-center-level asset administration shell," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 501-544, February.
    3. Seyed Ahmad Razavi Al-e-hashem & Ali Papi & Mir Saman Pishvaee & Mohammadreza Rasouli, 2022. "Robust maintenance planning and scheduling for multi-factory production networks considering disruption cost: a bi-objective optimization model and a metaheuristic solution method," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4999-5034, November.
    4. Geurtsen, M. & Didden, Jeroen B.H.C. & Adan, J. & Atan, Z. & Adan, I., 2023. "Production, maintenance and resource scheduling: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 501-529.
    5. Kyu Tae Park & Sang Ho Lee & Sang Do Noh, 2022. "Information fusion and systematic logic library-generation methods for self-configuration of autonomous digital twin," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(8), pages 2409-2439, December.
    6. Jafar-Zanjani, Hamed & Zandieh, Mostafa & Sharifi, Mani, 2022. "Robust and resilient joint periodic maintenance planning and scheduling in a multi-factory network under uncertainty: A case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    7. Gautam Dutta & Ravinder Kumar & Rahul Sindhwani & Rajesh Kr. Singh, 2021. "Digitalization priorities of quality control processes for SMEs: a conceptual study in perspective of Industry 4.0 adoption," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1679-1698, August.
    8. Christopher Hagedorn & Johannes Huegle & Rainer Schlosser, 2022. "Understanding unforeseen production downtimes in manufacturing processes using log data-driven causal reasoning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(7), pages 2027-2043, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01714-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.