IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v28y2017i2d10.1007_s10845-014-0995-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision guidance methodology for sustainable manufacturing using process analytics formalism

Author

Listed:
  • Guodong Shao

    (National Institute of Standards and Technology)

  • Alexander Brodsky

    (George Mason University)

  • Seung-Jun Shin

    (National Institute of Standards and Technology)

  • Duck Bong Kim

    (National Institute of Standards and Technology)

Abstract

Sustainable manufacturing has significant impact on a company’s business performance and competitiveness in today’s world. A growing number of manufacturing industries are initiating efforts to address sustainability issues; however, to achieve a higher level of sustainability, manufacturers need methodologies for formally describing, analyzing, evaluating, and optimizing sustainability performance metrics for manufacturing processes and systems. Currently, such methodologies are missing. This paper introduces a systematic decision-guidance methodology that uses the sustainable process analytics formalism (SPAF) developed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The methodology provides step-by-step guidance for users to perform sustainability performance analysis using SPAF, which supports data querying, what-if analysis, and decision optimization for sustainability metrics. Users use data from production, energy management, and a life cycle assessment reference database for modeling and analysis. As an example, a case study of investment planning for energy management systems has been performed to demonstrate the use of the methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Guodong Shao & Alexander Brodsky & Seung-Jun Shin & Duck Bong Kim, 2017. "Decision guidance methodology for sustainable manufacturing using process analytics formalism," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 455-472, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:28:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10845-014-0995-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-014-0995-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-014-0995-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-014-0995-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, Leigh & Ball, Peter, 2012. "Steps towards sustainable manufacturing through modelling material, energy and waste flows," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 227-238.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang Hou & Roger J. Jiao, 2020. "Data-informed inverse design by product usage information: a review, framework and outlook," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 529-552, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S.R. Patterson & E. Kozan & P. Hyland, 2016. "An integrated model of an open-pit coal mine: improving energy efficiency decisions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(14), pages 4213-4227, July.
    2. Valentin Grecu & Radu-Ilie-Gabriel Ciobotea & Adrian Florea, 2020. "Software Application for Organizational Sustainability Performance Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, May.
    3. Sasha Shahbazi & Martin Kurdve & Mats Zackrisson & Christina Jönsson & Anna Runa Kristinsdottir, 2019. "Comparison of Four Environmental Assessment Tools in Swedish Manufacturing: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Urban, Timothy L. & Chiang, Wen-Chyuan, 2016. "Designing energy-efficient serial production lines: The unpaced synchronous line-balancing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 789-801.
    5. Govindan, K. & Jafarian, A. & Khodaverdi, R. & Devika, K., 2014. "Two-echelon multiple-vehicle location–routing problem with time windows for optimization of sustainable supply chain network of perishable food," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 9-28.
    6. Förster, Bernadette, 2015. "Technology foresight for sustainable production in the German automotive supplier industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 237-248.
    7. Neeraj Bhanot & Fahham Hasan Qaiser & Mohammed Alkahtani & Ateekh Ur Rehman, 2020. "An Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Cause-And-Effect Analysis of Sustainable Manufacturing Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Anastasiia Moldavska & Torgeir Welo, 2018. "Testing and Verification of a New Corporate Sustainability Assessment Method for Manufacturing: A Multiple Case Research Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-40, November.
    9. Cagatay Tasdemir & Rado Gazo, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review for Better Understanding of Lean Driven Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-54, July.
    10. Chowdhury, Nasif & Yasmin, Jarin, 2018. "A Study On Sustainable Manufacturing Practices In RMG Industries Of Bangladesh," MPRA Paper 87104, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Sadia Samar Ali & Rajbir Kaur & D. Jinil Persis & Raiswa Saha & Murugan Pattusamy & V. Raja Sreedharan, 2023. "Developing a hybrid evaluation approach for the low carbon performance on sustainable manufacturing environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 249-281, May.
    12. Flavia Fechete & Anisor Nedelcu, 2019. "Performance Management Assessment Model for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    13. Cristina Ciliberto & Katarzyna Szopik‐Depczyńska & Małgorzata Tarczyńska‐Łuniewska & Alessandro Ruggieri & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2021. "Enabling the Circular Economy transition: a sustainable lean manufacturing recipe for Industry 4.0," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3255-3272, November.
    14. Papetti, Alessandra & Menghi, Roberto & Di Domizio, Giulia & Germani, Michele & Marconi, Marco, 2019. "Resources value mapping: A method to assess the resource efficiency of manufacturing systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 326-342.
    15. Rosario Domingo & Sergio Aguado, 2015. "Overall Environmental Equipment Effectiveness as a Metric of a Lean and Green Manufacturing System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Andrea Cardoni & Evgeniia Kiseleva & Rosa Lombardi, 2020. "A sustainable governance model to prevent corporate corruption: Integrating anticorruption practices, corporate strategy and business processes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1173-1185, March.
    17. Brandenburg, Marcus & Govindan, Kannan & Sarkis, Joseph & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 299-312.
    18. Sun, Jingchao & Na, Hongming & Yan, Tianyi & Che, Zichang & Qiu, Ziyang & Yuan, Yuxing & Li, Yingnan & Du, Tao & Song, Yanli & Fang, Xin, 2022. "Cost-benefit assessment of manufacturing system using comprehensive value flow analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    19. Wishal Naveed & Majsa Ammouriova & Noman Naveed & Angel A. Juan, 2022. "Circular Economy and Information Technologies: Identifying and Ranking the Factors of Successful Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Monjurul Hasan, A S M & Trianni, Andrea & Shukla, Nagesh & Katic, Mile, 2022. "A novel characterization based framework to incorporate industrial energy management services," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:28:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10845-014-0995-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.