IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joiaen/v7y2018i1d10.1186_s13731-018-0091-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A maturity model for software startup ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Cukier

    (University of São Paulo)

  • Fabio Kon

    (University of São Paulo)

Abstract

Resulting from the digital revolution of the last decades, multiple startup hubs flourished across the globe in the past 10 years. Healthy environments for the development of innovative, nascent digital enterprises require a well-balanced variety of agents and supporting processes, which we collectively call a software startup ecosystem. These ecosystems are fundamental for the insertion of countries in the digital economy of the twenty-first century. However, having all the elements that compose such environments in the most advanced and prolific state is difficult and relatively rare. In this paper, we show that startup ecosystems can evolve over time passing through a sequence of maturity level stages. For that, we introduce a maturity model for software startup ecosystems based on systematic qualitative research around a multiple case study we conducted across three ecosystems. The study was carried out over 4 years and included an extensive array of data collection mechanisms such as literature reviews, expert interviews, and observations in three relevant ecosystems (Tel-Aviv, São Paulo, and New York); all collected data were analyzed with techniques based on Grounded Theory, resulting in a conceptual framework of software startup ecosystems. Finally, we developed a maturity model for startup ecosystems, which helps us understand their evolution and dynamics. Moreover, it can serve as a basis for stakeholders in less mature ecosystems to analyze their environment, identify weak spots, and propose policies and practical actions for improving their ecosystems over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Cukier & Fabio Kon, 2018. "A maturity model for software startup ecosystems," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-32, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:7:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-018-0091-6
    DOI: 10.1186/s13731-018-0091-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13731-018-0091-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13731-018-0091-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amnon Frenkel & Shlomo Maital, 2014. "Mapping National Innovation Ecosystems," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15408.
    2. Zoltán J. Ács & László Szerb & Esteban Lafuente & Ainsley Lloyd, 2018. "The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index," SpringerBriefs in Economics, in: Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2018, chapter 0, pages 21-37, Springer.
    3. Erik Stam, 2015. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1759-1769, September.
    4. Zoltan J. Acs & László Szerb & Erkko Autio, 2015. "Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2014," SpringerBriefs in Economics, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-14932-5, October.
    5. Norris Krueger & Francisco Liñán & Ghulam Nabi, 2013. "Cultural values and entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(9-10), pages 703-707, December.
    6. Subhash V. Kasturi & M.H. Bala Subrahmanya, 2014. "Start-ups and small scale industry growth in India: do institutional credit and start-ups make a difference?," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3), pages 277-298.
    7. Lyons Thomas S. & Alter Theodore R. & Audretsch David & Augustine Darline, 2012. "Entrepreneurship and Community: The Next Frontier of Entrepreneurship Inquiry," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Romy Voss & Christoph Müller, 2009. "How are the conditions for high-tech start-ups in Germany?," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 284-311.
    9. Zoltan J. Acs & Catherine Armington, 2008. "Employment Growth and Entrepreneurial Activity in Cities," Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, chapter 25, pages 353-369, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Etzkowitz, Henry & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 109-123, February.
    11. Gregg A. Lichtenstein & Thomas S. Lyons, 2001. "The Entrepreneurial Development System: Transforming Business Talent and Community Economies," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 15(1), pages 3-20, February.
    12. Dan Breznitz & Mollie Taylor, 2014. "The communal roots of entrepreneurial-technological growth - social fragmentation and stagnation: reflection on Atlanta's technology cluster," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3-4), pages 375-396, May.
    13. Michael Gibbert & Winfried Ruigrok & Barbara Wicki, 2008. "What passes as a rigorous case study?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(13), pages 1465-1474, December.
    14. Erik Stam, 2018. "Measuring Entrepreneurial Ecosystems," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Allan O'Connor & Erik Stam & Fiona Sussan & David B. Audretsch (ed.), Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, pages 173-197, Springer.
    15. Eric Vaz & Teresa de Noronha Vaz & Purificacion Vicente Galindo & Peter Nijkamp, 2014. "Modelling innovation support systems for regional development -- analysis of cluster structures in innovation in Portugal," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1-2), pages 23-46, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Doss Daniel Adrian & Henley Russ & Hong Qiuqi & Pickett Trey, 2019. "Investigating Process Maturity Modeling as an Advertising Process Improvement Paradigm," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 32(2), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Marisa Leal & Carmem Leal & Rui Silva, 2023. "The Involvement of Universities, Incubators, Municipalities, and Business Associations in Fostering Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Promoting Local Growth," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Jose L. Salmeron & Taha Mansouri & Mohammad Reza Sadeghi Moghaddam & Narjes Yousefi & Alireza Tayebi, 2023. "Startup’s critical failure factors dynamic modeling using FCM," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Kenneth Kayser & Arnesh Telukdarie & Simon P. Philbin, 2023. "Digital Start-Up Ecosystems: A Systematic Literature Review and Model Development for South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Mungila Hillemane Bala Subrahmanya, 2022. "Competitiveness of High-Tech Start-Ups and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: An Overview," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-10, June.
    6. Carmelina Bevilacqua & Pasquale Pizzimenti & Yapeng Ou, 2023. "Cities in Transition and Urban Innovation Ecosystems: Place and Innovation Dynamics in the Case of Boston and Cambridge (USA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-30, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dorine Cornet & Jean Bonnet & Sébastien Bourdin, 2023. "Digital entrepreneurship indicator (DEI): an analysis of the case of the greater Paris metropolitan area," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 71(3), pages 697-724, December.
    2. Xaver Neumeyer & Susana C. Santos & Michael H. Morris, 2019. "Who is left out: exploring social boundaries in entrepreneurial ecosystems," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 462-484, April.
    3. Coad, Alex & Srhoj, Stjepan, 2023. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional persistence of high growth firms: A ‘broken clock’ critique," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    4. Jianhong Zhang & Désirée Gorp & Henk Kievit, 2023. "Digital technology and national entrepreneurship: An ecosystem perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1077-1105, June.
    5. McAdam, Maura & Crowley, Caren & Harrison, Richard T., 2019. "“To boldly go where no [man] has gone before” - Institutional voids and the development of women's digital entrepreneurship11The title is taken from the original titles voice-over for the TV series St," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 912-922.
    6. Wei, Yifan, 2022. "Regional governments and opportunity entrepreneurship in underdeveloped institutional environments: An entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    7. Christina Theodoraki & Alexis Catanzaro, 2022. "Widening the borders of entrepreneurial ecosystem through the international lens," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 383-406, April.
    8. Colin Donaldson, 2021. "Culture in the entrepreneurial ecosystem: a conceptual framing," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 289-319, March.
    9. Wei, Yifan, 2022. "Reprint of: Regional governments and opportunity entrepreneurship in underdeveloped institutional environments: An entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    10. Yasuyuki Motoyama & Susan Clark Muntean & Karren Knowlton & Banu Ozkazanc-Pan, 2021. "Causes of the gender divide within entrepreneurship ecosystems," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(3), pages 187-204, May.
    11. Philip T. Roundy, 2017. "Hybrid organizations and the logics of entrepreneurial ecosystems," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1221-1237, December.
    12. Roundy, Philip T. & Brockman, Beverly K. & Bradshaw, Mike, 2017. "The resilience of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 99-104.
    13. Elisa Thomas & Kadigia Faccin & Bjørn Terje Asheim, 2021. "Universities as orchestrators of the development of regional innovation ecosystems in emerging economies," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 770-789, June.
    14. Alvedalen, Janna & Carlsson, Bo, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Five Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in Life Sciences," Papers in Innovation Studies 2021/10, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    15. Maysami, Amir Mahdi & Mohammadi Elyasi, Ghanbar, 2020. "Designing the framework of technological entrepreneurship ecosystem: A grounded theory approach in the context of Iran," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    16. Yan Yan & Jiancheng Guan, 2019. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem, entrepreneurial rate and innovation: the moderating role of internet attention," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 625-650, June.
    17. Raquel Ortega-Argilés, 2022. "The evolution of regional entrepreneurship policies: “no one size fits all”," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(3), pages 585-610, December.
    18. Krisztofer Szabo & Marta Aranyossy & Dora Barczy, 2022. "From University Student to Entrepreneur - Factors Influencing the Entrepreneurial Intentions of Business Development MSc Students," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 21(2), pages 125-151.
    19. Svetlana V. Orekhova & Andrey V. Misyura, 2021. "Agriculture and industry in Russia: Are there any indications of an entrepreneurial ecosystem?," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 22(3), pages 69-83, October.
    20. Kim, Younghwan & Kim, Wonjoon & Yang, Taeyong, 2012. "The effect of the triple helix system and habitat on regional entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence from the U.S," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 154-166.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:7:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-018-0091-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.