IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joiaen/v10y2021i1d10.1186_s13731-021-00180-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The disruptive triad and entrepreneurship: a theoretical model

Author

Listed:
  • Félix O. Socorro Márquez

    (Complutense University of Madrid)

  • Giovanni E. Reyes Ortiz

    (Universidad del Rosario)

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to propose a theoretical model to understand the importance of disruption—in three of its dimensions, thinking, creativity, and innovation—developed and applied in the thinking and exercise of entrepreneurship and, at the same time, highlight the relationship of the disruption with competitiveness. Being competitive is one of the most demanding goals that entrepreneurs can and should set themselves; however, unlike established or traditional companies, usually the entrepreneur cannot promote competitiveness in the same way that they do. Taking these into account, it is necessary to use unconventional tools, or a different perspective methodology, for promoting creativity and innovation beyond the entrepreneurial activity itself. Through a qualitative methodology, with an emphasis on documentary research and inferential and deductive reasoning, a theoretical model is proposed. The model seeks to illustrate how disruptive currents can help entrepreneurs to be more competitive and, at the same time, boost their entrepreneurial spirit.

Suggested Citation

  • Félix O. Socorro Márquez & Giovanni E. Reyes Ortiz, 2021. "The disruptive triad and entrepreneurship: a theoretical model," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:10:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-021-00180-6
    DOI: 10.1186/s13731-021-00180-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13731-021-00180-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13731-021-00180-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander S. Kritikos, 2024. "Entrepreneurs and their impact on jobs and economic growth," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 1-8.2, October.
    2. repec:iza:izawol:journl:y:2014:p:8 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang Xiufan & Fan Decheng, 2024. "Research on Digital Transformation and Organizational Innovation of Manufacturing Firms Based on Knowledge Field," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 15860-15903, December.
    2. T. A. Alka & Aswathy Sreenivasan & M. Suresh, 2025. "Entrepreneurial strategies for sustainable growth: a deep dive into cloud-native technology and its applications," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konon, Alexander & Fritsch, Michael & Kritikos, Alexander S., 2018. "Business cycles and start-ups across industries: An empirical analysis of German regions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 742-761.
    2. Ehsan Salih & Emdad Khaleel Mahmood & Zhian Bwrhan Mustafa & Samian Karim Ado & Rebar Maghdid Ahmad, 2024. "The impact of socio-cultural factors on entrepreneurial failure in Soran city," Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, Center for Islamic Economics and Development Studies [P3EI], vol. 3(2), pages 105-120.
    3. Bhuiyan, Muhammad Faress & Ivlevs, Artjoms, 2019. "Micro-entrepreneurship and subjective well-being: Evidence from rural Bangladesh," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 625-645.
    4. Erika Urbankova & David Krizek, 2020. "Homogeneity of Determinants in the Financial Sector and Investment in EU Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Jungsuk Kim & Cynthia Castillejos-Petalcorin & Yothin Jinjarak & Donghyun Park & Pilipinas Quising & Shu Tian, 2022. "Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Perspective," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 672, Asian Development Bank.
    6. Anita Wölfl, 2021. "Corona – Krise oder Chance für Start-ups?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 74(01), pages 62-65, January.
    7. Kritikos, Alexander, 2022. "Personality and Entrepreneurship," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1137, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    8. Megbel Aleidan, 2018. "A Correlational Analysis to Assess Major Obstacles Associated with the Internationalization of Saudi Startup Enterprises," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(12), pages 78-88, December.
    9. Alexander Konon & Michael Fritsch & Alexander Kritikos, 2017. "Business Cycles and Start-ups across Industries: an Empirical Analysis for Germany," Jena Economics Research Papers 2017-013, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    10. Ali Osman Uymaz & Ali Rıza Esmen, 2022. "Bitcoin Mining in Turkey as an Example of Speculative Entrepreneurship," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 51(2), pages 375-397, November.
    11. Dejen Ketema Mamo & Enat Agachew Ayele & Shewafera Wondimagegnhu Teklu, 2024. "Modelling and Analysis of the Impact of Corruption on Economic Growth and Unemployment," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, June.
    12. Pradhan, Rudra P. & Arvin, Mak B. & Nair, Mahendhiran & Bennett, Sara E., 2020. "The dynamics among entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic growth in the Eurozone countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1106-1122.
    13. Lechmann, Daniel S. J. & Wunder, Christoph, 2016. "The dynamics of solo self-employment: Persistence and transition to employership," Discussion Papers 98, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Chair of Labour and Regional Economics.
    14. Renata Dana Nițu-Antonie & Emőke-Szidónia Feder & Valentin Partenie Munteanu, 2017. "Macroeconomic Effects of Entrepreneurship from an International Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Richard J. Paulsen & Neil Alper & Gregory Wassall, 2021. "Arts majors as entrepreneurs and innovators," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 639-652, August.
    16. Artjoms Ivlevs & Milena Nikolova & Olga Popova, 2019. "Former Communist party membership and present-day entrepreneurship in Central and Eastern Europe," Working Papers 384, Leibniz Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung (Leibniz Institute for East and Southeast European Studies).
    17. Víctor M. González Sánchez, 2018. "Self-employment, Knowledge and Economic Growth: An empirical study for Latin American countries," Contemporary Economics, Vizja University, vol. 12(4), December.
    18. Christian Reiner & Christian Bellak, 2023. "Hat die ökonomische Macht von Unternehmen in Österreich zugenommen? Teil 2," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 49(2), pages 17-76.
    19. , Aisdl, 2017. "Problems and prospects of women entrepreneurship with special reference to MSMEs in the state of Gujarat," OSF Preprints u7jkb, Center for Open Science.
    20. Johan Graafland, 2020. "When Does Economic Freedom Promote Well Being? On the Moderating Role of Long-Term Orientation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 127-153, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:10:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-021-00180-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.