IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joheur/v25y2019i4d10.1007_s10732-018-9397-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Swarm hyperheuristic framework

Author

Listed:
  • Surafel Luleseged Tilahun

    (University of Zululand
    Addis Ababa University)

  • Mohamed A. Tawhid

    (Thompson Rivers University
    Alexandria University)

Abstract

Swarm intelligence is one of the central focus areas in the study of metaheuristic algorithms. The effectiveness of these algorithms towards solving difficult problems has attracted researchers and practitioners. As a result, numerous type of this algorithm have been proposed. However, there is a heavy critics that some of these algorithms lack novelty. In fact, some of these algorithms are the same in terms of the updating operators but with different mimicking scenarios and names. The performance of a metaheuristic algorithm depends on how it balance the degree of the two basic search mechanisms, namely intensification and diversification. Hence, introducing novel algorithms which contributes to a new way of search mechanism is welcome but not for a mere repetition of the same algorithm with the same or perturbed operators but different metaphor. With this regard, it is ideal to have a framework where different custom made operators are used along with existing or new operators. Hence, this paper presents a swarm hyperheuristic framework, where updating operators are taken as low level heuristics and guided by a high level hyperheuristic. Different learning approaches are also proposed to guide the intensification and diversification search behaviour of the algorithm. Hence, a swarm hyperheuristic without learning ( $${ SHH}1$$ SHH 1 ), with offline learning ( $${ SHH}2)$$ SHH 2 ) and with an online learning ( $${ SHH}3$$ SHH 3 ) is proposed and discussed. A simulation based comparison and discussion is also presented using a set of nine updating operators with selected metaheuristic algorithms based on twenty benchmark problems. The problems are selected from both unconstrained and constrained optimization problems with their dimension ranging from two to fifty. The simulation results show that the proposed approach with learning has a better performance in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Surafel Luleseged Tilahun & Mohamed A. Tawhid, 2019. "Swarm hyperheuristic framework," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 809-836, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joheur:v:25:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10732-018-9397-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10732-018-9397-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10732-018-9397-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10732-018-9397-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edmund K Burke & Michel Gendreau & Matthew Hyde & Graham Kendall & Gabriela Ochoa & Ender Özcan & Rong Qu, 2013. "Hyper-heuristics: a survey of the state of the art," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(12), pages 1695-1724, December.
    2. Kevin M. Passino, 2010. "Bacterial Foraging Optimization," International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research (IJSIR), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Surafel Luleseged Tilahun & Hong Choon Ong & Jean Medard T. Ngnotchouye, 2016. "Extended Prey-Predator Algorithm with a Group Hunting Scenario," Advances in Operations Research, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-14, July.
    4. Surafel Luleseged Tilahun & Maba B. Matadi, 2018. "Weight Minimization of a Speed Reducer Using Prey Predator Algorithm," International Journal of Manufacturing, Materials, and Mechanical Engineering (IJMMME), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 19-32, April.
    5. Ender Özcan & Mustafa Misir & Gabriela Ochoa & Edmund K. Burke, 2010. "A Reinforcement Learning - Great-Deluge Hyper-Heuristic for Examination Timetabling," International Journal of Applied Metaheuristic Computing (IJAMC), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 39-59, January.
    6. Jones, D. F. & Mirrazavi, S. K. & Tamiz, M., 2002. "Multi-objective meta-heuristics: An overview of the current state-of-the-art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 1-9, February.
    7. Anuj Mehrotra & Ellis L. Johnson & George L. Nemhauser, 1998. "An Optimization Based Heuristic for Political Districting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(8), pages 1100-1114, August.
    8. Manzini, Riccardo & Bindi, Filippo, 2009. "Strategic design and operational management optimization of a multi stage physical distribution system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 915-936, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. W. B. Yates & E. C. Keedwell, 2019. "An analysis of heuristic subsequences for offline hyper-heuristic learning," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 399-430, June.
    2. Ahmed Kheiri, 2020. "Heuristic Sequence Selection for Inventory Routing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 302-312, March.
    3. Johnes, Jill, 2015. "Operational Research in education," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 683-696.
    4. Folarin B. Oyebolu & Jeroen Lidth de Jeude & Cyrus Siganporia & Suzanne S. Farid & Richard Allmendinger & Juergen Branke, 2017. "A new lot sizing and scheduling heuristic for multi-site biopharmaceutical production," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 231-256, August.
    5. Ahmed, Leena & Mumford, Christine & Kheiri, Ahmed, 2019. "Solving urban transit route design problem using selection hyper-heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 545-559.
    6. Ahmed Kheiri & Alina G. Dragomir & David Mueller & Joaquim Gromicho & Caroline Jagtenberg & Jelke J. Hoorn, 2019. "Tackling a VRP challenge to redistribute scarce equipment within time windows using metaheuristic algorithms," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(5), pages 561-595, December.
    7. Wilson, Dennis & Rodrigues, Silvio & Segura, Carlos & Loshchilov, Ilya & Hutter, Frank & Buenfil, Guillermo López & Kheiri, Ahmed & Keedwell, Ed & Ocampo-Pineda, Mario & Özcan, Ender & Peña, Sergio Iv, 2018. "Evolutionary computation for wind farm layout optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 681-691.
    8. Andrzej Kozik, 2017. "Handling precedence constraints in scheduling problems by the sequence pair representation," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 445-472, February.
    9. Özceylan, Eren & Paksoy, Turan & Bektaş, Tolga, 2014. "Modeling and optimizing the integrated problem of closed-loop supply chain network design and disassembly line balancing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 142-164.
    10. Juan Yu & Mi Gan & Shaoquan Ni & Dingjun Chen, 2018. "Multi-objective models and real case study for dual-channel FAP supply chain network design with fuzzy information," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 389-403, February.
    11. Schweiger, Katharina & Sahamie, Ramin, 2013. "A hybrid Tabu Search approach for the design of a paper recycling network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 98-119.
    12. Rong, Aiying & Figueira, José Rui, 2013. "A reduction dynamic programming algorithm for the bi-objective integer knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 299-313.
    13. J E C Arroyo & V A Armentano, 2004. "A partial enumeration heuristic for multi-objective flowshop scheduling problems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(9), pages 1000-1007, September.
    14. Raja Awais Liaqait & Shermeen Hamid & Salman Sagheer Warsi & Azfar Khalid, 2021. "A Critical Analysis of Job Shop Scheduling in Context of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Anuj Mehrotra & Joseph Shantz & Michael A. Trick, 2005. "Determining newspaper marketing zones using contiguous clustering," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(1), pages 82-92, February.
    16. Shu, Jia & Li, Zhengyi & Shen, Houcai & Wu, Ting & Zhong, Weijun, 2012. "A logistics network design model with vendor managed inventory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 754-761.
    17. Yu, Shiwei & Zheng, Shuhong & Gao, Shiwei & Yang, Juan, 2017. "A multi-objective decision model for investment in energy savings and emission reductions in coal mining," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 335-347.
    18. Derya Deliktaş, 2022. "Self-adaptive memetic algorithms for multi-objective single machine learning-effect scheduling problems with release times," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 748-784, September.
    19. Sepehr Nemati & Oleg V. Shylo & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Andrew J. Schaefer, 2016. "The Surgical Patient Routing Problem: A Central Planner Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 657-673, November.
    20. Raidl, Günther R., 2015. "Decomposition based hybrid metaheuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 66-76.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joheur:v:25:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10732-018-9397-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.