IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joecth/v67y2019i2d10.1007_s00199-019-01182-y.html

Special Issue: Optimal Transportation, Equilibrium, and Applications to Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Alfred Galichon

    (New York University)

  • Robert McCann

    (University of Toronto)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfred Galichon & Robert McCann, 2019. "Special Issue: Optimal Transportation, Equilibrium, and Applications to Economics," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(2), pages 345-347, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joecth:v:67:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s00199-019-01182-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s00199-019-01182-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00199-019-01182-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00199-019-01182-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georg Nöldeke & Larry Samuelson, 2018. "The Implementation Duality," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 1283-1324, July.
    2. Brendan Pass, 2019. "Interpolating between matching and hedonic pricing models," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(2), pages 393-419, March.
    3. Sonia Jaffe & Simon Weber, 2019. "The effect of meeting rates on matching outcomes," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(2), pages 363-378, March.
    4. Jianfei Cao & Xiaoxia Shi & Matthew Shum, 2019. "On the empirical content of the Beckerian marriage model," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(2), pages 349-362, March.
    5. Pierre-André Chiappori & Sonia Oreffice & Climent Quintana-Domeque, 2020. "Erratum: Fatter Attraction: Anthropometric and Socioeconomic Matching on the Marriage Market," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(12), pages 4673-4675.
    6. Eugene Choo & Aloysius Siow, 2006. "Who Marries Whom and Why," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 114(1), pages 175-201, February.
    7. Carlier, Guillaume, 2001. "A general existence result for the principal-agent problem with adverse selection," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 129-150, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre-Andr'e Chiappori & Robert McCann & Brendan Pass, 2016. "Multidimensional matching," Papers 1604.05771, arXiv.org.
    2. Alfred Galichon & Simon Weber, 2024. "Matching under Imperfectly Transferable Utility," Papers 2403.05222, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    3. Jacques Silber & Sasiwimon Warunsiri Paweenawat & Lusi Liao, 2022. "On the measurement of non-random mating and of its change over time," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 161-198, March.
    4. Dan Anderberg & Jesper Bagger & V. Bhaskar & Tanya Wilson, 2019. "Marriage market equilibrium, qualifications, and ability," CESifo Working Paper Series 7570, CESifo.
    5. Keisuke Kawata & Mizuki Komura, 2023. "Only-child matching penalty in the marriage market," Papers 2307.15336, arXiv.org.
    6. Laurens Cherchye & Thomas Demuynck & Bram De Rock & Frederic Vermeulen, 2017. "Household Consumption When the Marriage Is Stable," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(6), pages 1507-1534, June.
    7. Nikhil Agarwal & Eric Budish, 2021. "Market Design," NBER Working Papers 29367, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Hoehn-Velasco, Lauren & Penglase, Jacob, 2023. "Changes in assortative matching and educational inequality: evidence from marriage and birth records in Mexico," Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(4), pages 587-607, December.
    9. Arnaud Dupuy, 2021. "Migration in China: To work or to wed?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 393-415, June.
    10. Augsburg, Britta & Baquero, Juan P. & Gautam, Sanghmitra & Rodriguez-Lesmes, Paul, 2023. "Sanitation and marriage markets in India: Evidence from the Total Sanitation Campaign," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    11. Claudia Senik & Anne Solaz, 2025. "The price of youth: Income and Age-Hypergamy," PSE Working Papers halshs-04840609, HAL.
    12. Laura Bottazzi & Paolo Manasse & Sarah Grace See, 2017. "Better Wed Over the Mixen Than Over The Moon? Break-ups of Inter-ethnic Marriages in Italy," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 499, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    13. Edoardo Ciscato & Marion Goussé, 2024. "Matching on Gender and Sexual Orientation," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1213, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    14. Paul Cahu & Falilou Fall & Roland Pongou, 2014. "Beauty, Polygyny and Fertility: Theory and Evidence," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01130403, HAL.
    15. Tamás Fleiner & Ravi Jagadeesan & Zsuzsanna Jankó & Alexander Teytelboym, 2019. "Trading Networks With Frictions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(5), pages 1633-1661, September.
    16. Qinyou Hu, 2024. "Social status and marriage markets: Evaluating a Hukou policy in China," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 477-509, June.
    17. Alberto Bisin & Giulia Tura, 2019. "Marriage, Fertility, and Cultural Integration of Immigrants in Italy," Working Papers 2019-063, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    18. Doorley, Karina & Dupuy, Arnaud & Weber, Simon, 2019. "The empirical content of marital surplus in matching models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 51-54.
    19. Alberto Bisin & Giulia Tura, 2019. "Marriage, Fertility, and Cultural Integration in Italy," NBER Working Papers 26303, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Carlier, Guillaume & Zhang, Kelvin Shuangjian, 2020. "Existence of solutions to principal–agent problems with adverse selection under minimal assumptions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 64-71.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joecth:v:67:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s00199-019-01182-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.