IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jhappi/v26y2025i5d10.1007_s10902-024-00822-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demographic Variation in Inner Peace Across 22 Countries: A Cross-National Analysis of the Global Flourishing Study

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Lomas

    (Harvard University)

  • R. Noah Padgett

    (Harvard University)

  • James L. Ritchie-Dunham

    (Harvard University)

  • Matthew T. Lee

    (Baylor University)

  • James O. Pawelski

    (University of Pennsylvania)

  • Koichiro Shiba

    (Boston University)

  • Byron R. Johnson

    (Baylor University)

  • Tyler J. VanderWeele

    (Harvard University)

Abstract

Although peace is invariably regarded as a universal good, most research focuses on ‘outer’ forms (e.g., societal relations), with little attention to ‘inner’ peace (IP, i.e., tranquil states of mind). This may reflect the Western-centrism of academia, with low arousal positive states like IP being relatively undervalued in the West. But alongside broader efforts to redress such Western-centricity, an emergent literature is now exploring this concept. This report adds to this by presenting the most ambitious longitudinal study to date of IP, namely as an item – “In general, how often do you feel you are at peace with your thoughts and feelings?” – in the Global Flourishing Study, a five-year (minimum) panel study of the predictors of flourishing, involving (in this first year) 202,898 participants from 22 countries. This paper looks at demographic variation vis-à-vis IP, with our primary analyses consisting of meta-analyses across countries for each demographic group, focusing on three research questions. (1) What are the distributions and descriptive statistics of key demographic factors? (2) How does IP order across countries, with considerable variation observed, with the percentage always or often at peace ranging from 89% (95% CI = 87,90) in Hong Kong to just 49% (0.46,0.52) in Turkey. (3) How does IP vary across demographic categories, with the greatest variation among those always/often at peace observed in relation to age (68% [63,73] of 18–24 year olds versus 86% [73,94] of the 80+), followed by employment status (63% [0.57,0.68] of unemployed job-seekers versus 78% [65,75] of retirees), then religious attendance (68% [62,73] for non-attendees versus 80% [73,85] for more than once weekly). The results shed new light on the personal and contextual factors that shape this valued yet under-studied outcome, and provide a helpful foundation for further enquiry.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Lomas & R. Noah Padgett & James L. Ritchie-Dunham & Matthew T. Lee & James O. Pawelski & Koichiro Shiba & Byron R. Johnson & Tyler J. VanderWeele, 2025. "Demographic Variation in Inner Peace Across 22 Countries: A Cross-National Analysis of the Global Flourishing Study," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:26:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s10902-024-00822-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10902-024-00822-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10902-024-00822-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10902-024-00822-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Scheve & Frederike Esche & Jürgen Schupp, 2017. "The Emotional Timeline of Unemployment: Anticipation, Reaction, and Adaptation," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1231-1254, August.
    2. Viechtbauer, Wolfgang, 2010. "Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i03).
    3. Shi Yu & Chantal Levesque-Bristol & Yukiko Maeda, 2018. "General Need for Autonomy and Subjective Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis of Studies in the US and East Asia," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 1863-1882, August.
    4. David G. Blanchflower, 2021. "Is happiness U-shaped everywhere? Age and subjective well-being in 145 countries," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 34(2), pages 575-624, April.
    5. Mohsen Joshanloo, 2014. "Eastern Conceptualizations of Happiness: Fundamental Differences with Western Views," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 475-493, April.
    6. Joseph Henrich & Steven J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan, 2010. "Most people are not WEIRD," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7302), pages 29-29, July.
    7. Yi-Chen Lee & Yi-Cheng Lin & Chin-Lan Huang & Barbara Fredrickson, 2013. "The Construct and Measurement of Peace of Mind," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 571-590, April.
    8. Alex Michalos, 2008. "Education, Happiness and Wellbeing," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 87(3), pages 347-366, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Dolores Merino & Marta Velázquez & Tim Lomas, 2020. "An Exploration of the Spanish Cultural Term Rasmia: A Combination of Eagerness, Strength, Activeness, Courage, Tenacity and Gracefulness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 693-707, February.
    2. Manpreet Blessin & Sophie Lehmann & Angela M. Kunzler & Rolf van Dick & Klaus Lieb, 2022. "Resilience Interventions Conducted in Western and Eastern Countries—A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Xiaofeng Xu & Miaomiao Li & Ho Kwong Kwan & Xiaomeng Zhang, 2024. "The antecedents of moral identity: A meta-analytic review," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1697-1728, September.
    4. Joseph Cook & Jane Kabubo-Mariara & Peter Kimuyu, 2022. "Happy at Work in Africa? Measuring Hedonic Well-Being Among Water Carriers in Rural Kenya Using the Experience Sampling Method," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 2449-2468, August.
    5. Yuxiang Luan & Kai Zhao & Zheyuan Wang & Feng Hu, 2023. "Exploring the Antecedents of Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior (UPB): A Meta-Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(1), pages 119-136, September.
    6. İbrahim Demirci, 2022. "Family Harmony and Flourishing in Turkey: The Roles of Interdependent Happiness and Harmony in Life," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 985-1005, March.
    7. Sebastian Will & Timon Renz, 2023. "My Home is My Burden? Homeownership, Financial Burden and Subjective Well-Being in a Unitary Rental Market," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(5), pages 2227-2257, October.
    8. Whitney S Beck & Ed K Hall, 2018. "Confounding factors in algal phosphorus limitation experiments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Tianyi Qiu & Yu Shi & Josep Peñuelas & Ji Liu & Qingliang Cui & Jordi Sardans & Feng Zhou & Longlong Xia & Weiming Yan & Shuling Zhao & Shushi Peng & Jinshi Jian & Qinsi He & Wenju Zhang & Min Huang &, 2024. "Optimizing cover crop practices as a sustainable solution for global agroecosystem services," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Xindong Xue & W. Robert Reed & Robbie C.M. van Aert, 2022. "Social Capital and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis," Working Papers in Economics 22/20, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    11. Paul Schumann & Lars Kuchinke, 2020. "Do(n’t) Worry, It’s Temporary: The Effects of Fixed-Term Employment on Affective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(7), pages 2557-2582, October.
    12. Nils Lerch, 2018. "The Causal Analysis of the Development of the Unemployment Effect on Life Satisfaction," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 991, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    13. Bart Verkuil & Serpil Atasayi & Marc L Molendijk, 2015. "Workplace Bullying and Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis on Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Thi Truong An Hoang & Andreas Knabe, 2021. "Time Use, Unemployment, and Well-Being: An Empirical Analysis Using British Time-Use Data," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 2525-2548, August.
    15. Francesca Pilotto & Ingolf Kühn & Rita Adrian & Renate Alber & Audrey Alignier & Christopher Andrews & Jaana Bäck & Luc Barbaro & Deborah Beaumont & Natalie Beenaerts & Sue Benham & David S. Boukal & , 2020. "Meta-analysis of multidecadal biodiversity trends in Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:6:p:972-988 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. John A. List, 2024. "Optimally generate policy-based evidence before scaling," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7999), pages 491-499, February.
    18. Jonas Schmidt & Tammo H. A. Bijmolt, 2020. "Accurately measuring willingness to pay for consumer goods: a meta-analysis of the hypothetical bias," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 499-518, May.
    19. Andrew E. Clark, 2015. "SWB as a Measure of Individual Well-Being," Working Papers halshs-01134483, HAL.
    20. Malte Schwinger & Maike Trautner & Henrike Kärchner & Nantje Otterpohl, 2020. "Psychological Impact of Corona Lockdown in Germany: Changes in Need Satisfaction, Well-Being, Anxiety, and Depression," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-11, December.
    21. Bouma, J.A. & Nguyen, Binh & van der Heijden, Eline & Dijk, J.J., 2018. "Analysing Group Contract Design Using a Lab and a Lab-in-the-Field Threshold Public Good Experiment," Discussion Paper 2018-049, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:26:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s10902-024-00822-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.