IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jahrfr/v31y2011i1p1-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effizienz und Stabilität von Zweckverbänden

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Hiller

Abstract

In this paper, we employ the coalition structure approach of cooperative game theory to analyse three problems. First, we group local authorities in special purpose associations in an optimal way. Second, we use the PCore (Casajus, A, Tutic, A ( 2007 ) http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~micro/pcore.pdf ) to allocate the resulting costs of these special purpose associations. Third, we determine the circumstances under which the legislature should group local authorities in special purpose associations and implement the subsequent cost-sharing. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2011

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias Hiller, 2011. "Effizienz und Stabilität von Zweckverbänden," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 31(1), pages 1-9, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jahrfr:v:31:y:2011:i:1:p:1-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10037-011-0050-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10037-011-0050-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10037-011-0050-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Casajus, André, 2009. "Outside options, component efficiency, and stability," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 49-61, January.
    2. Harald Wiese, 2007. "Measuring The Power Of Parties Within Government Coalitions," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 307-322.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Guajardo & Kurt Jörnsten & Mikael Rönnqvist, 2016. "Constructive and blocking power in collaborative transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 25-50, January.
    2. Antonio Magaña & Francesc Carreras, 2018. "Coalition Formation and Stability," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 467-502, June.
    3. André Casajus, 2010. "Another characterization of the Owen value without the additivity axiom," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 69(4), pages 523-536, October.
    4. Casajus, André & Tutić, Andreas, 2013. "Nash bargaining, Shapley threats, and outside options," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 262-267.
    5. Takaaki Abe, 2018. "Stable coalition structures in symmetric majority games: a coincidence between myopia and farsightedness," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 353-374, October.
    6. Tobias Hiller, 2015. "The $$\chi $$ χ value and team games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 78(4), pages 539-548, April.
    7. Tobias Hiller, 2018. "On the Stability of Couples," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-10, July.
    8. Abe, Takaaki, 2021. "Stability and values for games with coalition structures," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    9. Tobias Hiller, 2023. "Training, Abilities and the Structure of Teams," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-8, May.
    10. Tobias Hiller, 2011. "A note on χ-values," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 58(4), pages 433-438, December.
    11. Tobias Hiller, 2022. "Allocation of portfolio risk and outside options," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2845-2848, October.
    12. Tobias Hiller, 2022. "Abilities and the structure of the firm," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 69(3), pages 339-349, September.
    13. Andreas Tutic & Stefan Pfau & André Casajus, 2011. "Experiments on bilateral bargaining in markets," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 529-546, April.
    14. Hiller, Tobias, 2017. "Quantitative overeducation and cooperative game theory," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 36-40.
    15. Piolatto, Amedeo, 2011. "Plurality versus proportional electoral rule: Which is most representative of voters?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 311-327, June.
    16. Yoshio Kamijo, 2013. "The collective value: a new solution for games with coalition structures," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(3), pages 572-589, October.
    17. Elena Parilina & Artem Sedakov, 2016. "Stable Cooperation in a Game with a Major Player," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 1-20, June.
    18. Tobias Hiller, 2018. "The Effects of Excluding Coalitions," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, January.
    19. Gusev, Vasily V., 2021. "Nash-stable coalition partition and potential functions in games with coalition structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1180-1188.
    20. Calvo, Emilio & Gutiérrez, Esther, 2010. "Solidarity in games with a coalition structure," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 196-203, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Zweckverbände; Kooperative Spieltheorie; PCore; C71; H11; Special purpose associations; Cooperative game theory; PCore;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games
    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jahrfr:v:31:y:2011:i:1:p:1-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.