IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v23y2018i1d10.1007_s13253-017-0315-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Test of Positive Association for Detecting Heterogeneity in Capture for Capture–Recapture Data

Author

Listed:
  • Anita Jeyam

    (University of Kent)

  • Rachel S. McCrea

    (University of Kent)

  • Thomas Bregnballe

    (Aarhus University)

  • Morten Frederiksen

    (Aarhus University)

  • Roger Pradel

    (Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive UMR 5175, CNRS - Université de Montpellier - Université Paul-Valéry)

Abstract

The Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) model assumes that all marked animals have equal recapture probabilities at each sampling occasion, but heterogeneity in capture often occurs and should be taken into account to avoid biases in parameter estimates. Although diagnostic tests are generally used to detect trap-dependence or transience and assess the overall fit of the model, heterogeneity in capture is not routinely tested for. In order to detect and identify this phenomenon in a CJS framework, we propose a test of positive association between previous and future encounters using Goodman–Kruskal’s gamma. This test is based solely on the raw capture histories and makes no assumption on model structure. The development of the test is motivated by a dataset of Sandwich terns (Thalasseus sandvicensis), and we use the test to formally show that they exhibit heterogeneity in capture. We use simulation to assess the performance of the test in the detection of heterogeneity in capture, compared to existing and corrected diagnostic goodness-of-fit tests, Leslie’s test of equal catchability and Carothers’ extension of the Leslie test. The test of positive association is easy to use and produces good results, demonstrating high power to detect heterogeneity in capture. We recommend using this new test prior to model fitting as the outcome will guide the model-building process and help draw more accurate biological conclusions. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita Jeyam & Rachel S. McCrea & Thomas Bregnballe & Morten Frederiksen & Roger Pradel, 2018. "A Test of Positive Association for Detecting Heterogeneity in Capture for Capture–Recapture Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:23:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s13253-017-0315-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-017-0315-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-017-0315-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-017-0315-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fitsum Abadi & Andre Botha & Res Altwegg, 2013. "Revisiting the Effect of Capture Heterogeneity on Survival Estimates in Capture-Mark-Recapture Studies: Does It Matter?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-8, April.
    2. Shirley Pledger & Kenneth H. Pollock & James L. Norris, 2003. "Open Capture-Recapture Models with Heterogeneity: I. Cormack-Jolly-Seber Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 786-794, December.
    3. B. J. T. Morgan & M. S. Ridout, 2008. "A new mixture model for capture heterogeneity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 57(4), pages 433-446, September.
    4. Roger Pradel & Claire M. A. Wintrebert & Olivier Gimenez, 2003. "A Proposal for a Goodness-of-Fit Test to the Arnason-Schwarz Multisite Capture-Recapture Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 43-53, March.
    5. Oliver, Lauren J. & Morgan, Byron J.T. & Durant, Sarah M. & Pettorelli, Nathalie, 2011. "Individual heterogeneity in recapture probability and survival estimates in cheetah," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 776-784.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roger Pradel, 2005. "Multievent: An Extension of Multistate Capture–Recapture Models to Uncertain States," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 442-447, June.
    2. Zhang, Hongmei & Ghosh, Kaushik & Ghosh, Pulak, 2012. "Sampling designs via a multivariate hypergeometric-Dirichlet process model for a multi-species assemblage with unknown heterogeneity," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 2562-2573.
    3. Ann E. McKellar & Roland Langrock & Jeffrey R. Walters & Dylan C. Kesler, 2015. "Using mixed hidden Markov models to examine behavioral states in a cooperatively breeding bird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 148-157.
    4. Riki Herliansyah & Ruth King & Stuart King, 2022. "Laplace Approximations for Capture–Recapture Models in the Presence of Individual Heterogeneity," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(3), pages 401-418, September.
    5. Jerome A. Dupuis & Carl James Schwarz, 2007. "A Bayesian Approach to the Multistate Jolly–Seber Capture–Recapture Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1015-1022, December.
    6. J. Andrew Royle, 2008. "Modeling Individual Effects in the Cormack–Jolly–Seber Model: A State–Space Formulation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 364-370, June.
    7. Jakub Stoklosa & Wen-Han Hwang & Sheng-Hai Wu & Richard Huggins, 2011. "Heterogeneous Capture–Recapture Models with Covariates: A Partial Likelihood Approach for Closed Populations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1659-1665, December.
    8. R. B. O'Hara & S. Lampila & M. Orell, 2009. "Estimation of Rates of Births, Deaths, and Immigration from Mark–Recapture Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 275-281, March.
    9. Choquet, Rémi & Garnier, Alexandre & Awuve, Edem & Besnard, Aurélien, 2017. "Transient state estimation using continuous-time processes applied to opportunistic capture–recapture data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 361(C), pages 157-163.
    10. Shirley Pledger & Kenneth H. Pollock & James L. Norris, 2010. "Open Capture–Recapture Models with Heterogeneity: II. Jolly–Seber Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 883-890, September.
    11. Orasa Anan & Dankmar Böhning & Antonello Maruotti, 2017. "Population size estimation and heterogeneity in capture–recapture data: a linear regression estimator based on the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(1), pages 49-79, March.
    12. Peter L Ormosi, 2011. "A tip of the iceberg? The probability of catching cartels," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2011-06, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    13. Hannah Worthington & Rachel S. McCrea & Ruth King & Richard A. Griffiths, 2019. "Estimation of Population Size When Capture Probability Depends on Individual States," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(1), pages 154-172, March.
    14. Eleni Matechou & Stephen N. Freeman & Richard Comont, 2018. "Caste-Specific Demography and Phenology in Bumblebees: Modelling BeeWalk Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(4), pages 427-445, December.
    15. Meeri Koivuniemi & Mika Kurkilahti & Marja Niemi & Miina Auttila & Mervi Kunnasranta, 2019. "A mark–recapture approach for estimating population size of the endangered ringed seal (Phoca hispida saimensis)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Rachel S. McCrea & Byron J. T. Morgan & Olivier Gimenez, 2017. "A new strategy for diagnostic model assessment in capture–recapture," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(4), pages 815-831, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:23:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s13253-017-0315-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.