IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v3y2001i4d10.1023_a1012876804965.html

Modeling and IT Perspectives on Supply Chain Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy F. Shapiro

Abstract

The essence of supply chain management is integrated planning of activities across the firm's supply chain, including those of its suppliers and customers. Integrated planning refers to functional, geographical and inter-temporal coordination of managerial decisions. It requires and invokes modeling systems and processes that support data-driven or fact-based planning. A major challenge is to understand how to seamlessly imbed modeling systems in the firm's information technology. This paper examines five perspectives on these connections.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy F. Shapiro, 2001. "Modeling and IT Perspectives on Supply Chain Integration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 455-464, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:3:y:2001:i:4:d:10.1023_a:1012876804965
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1012876804965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1012876804965
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1012876804965?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Terry P. Harrison, 2001. "Global Supply Chain Design," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 413-416, December.
    2. Marcikic, Aleksandra & Radovanov, Boris, . "Simulation in inventory management," Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 3, pages 1-3.
    3. Vladimir Krasik & Joseph Leung & Michael Pinedo & Jiawei Zhang, 2008. "Scheduling multiple products on parallel machines with setup costs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(7), pages 654-669, October.
    4. Benjamin Lev, 2003. "Book Reviews," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 77-82, April.
    5. Thomas C. Sharkey & Joseph Geunes & H. Edwin Romeijn & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2011. "Exact algorithms for integrated facility location and production planning problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(5), pages 419-436, August.
    6. Daisy Bertrand & Marie-Christine Longe Monnoyer & Anne Marianne Seck & Bénédicte Aldebert, 2014. "Les Systemes D'Informations Inter- Organisationnelles Et La Creation De Valeur : Resultats D'Une Etude Menee Aupres De Deux Grandes Entreprises Françaises Eurocopter Et Cegelec-Vinci Et Leurs Fournisseurs," Working Papers hal-02551383, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marlen Gabriele Arnold & Kai Hockerts, 2011. "The greening dutchman: Philips' process of green flagging to drive sustainable innovations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(6), pages 394-407, September.
    2. Hsieh, Chia-Chun & Ma, Zhiming & Novoselov, Kirill E., 2019. "Accounting conservatism, business strategy, and ambiguity," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 41-55.
    3. Xiong, Jiwei & Wang, Tao & Yang, Haibin, 2024. "Innovation search after failure: The role of peers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    4. Carsten Bergenholtz & Oana Vuculescu & Ali Amidi, 2023. "Microfoundations of Adaptive Search in Complex Tasks: The Role of Cognitive Abilities and Styles," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 2043-2063, November.
    5. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    6. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    7. Josse Delfgaauw & Otto H. Swank, 2016. "Task‐Specific Human Capital and Organizational Inertia," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 608-626, September.
    8. Peixu He & Yana Pei & Chunpei Lin & Di Ye, 2021. "Ambidextrous Marketing Capabilities, Exploratory and Exploitative Market-Based Innovation, and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study on China’s Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Insoo Cho & Peter F. Orazem, 2021. "How endogenous risk preferences and sample selection affect analysis of firm survival," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1309-1332, April.
    10. Tomasz Helbin & Amy Van Looy, 2021. "Is Business Process Management (BPM) Ready for Ambidexterity? Conceptualization, Implementation Guidelines and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Kornberger, Martin & Justesen, Lise & Mouritsen, Jan, 2011. "“When you make manager, we put a big mountain in front of you”: An ethnography of managers in a Big 4 Accounting Firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 514-533.
    12. Morgan Swink & Kejia Hu & Xiande Zhao, 2022. "Analytics applications, limitations, and opportunities in restaurant supply chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3710-3726, October.
    13. Son K. Lam & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Ashish Sharma, 2019. "Salesperson ambidexterity in customer engagement: do customer base characteristics matter?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 659-680, July.
    14. Inseong Song & Jonghoon Bae, 2016. "Politics, strong institution and competitive advantage: an examination of organizational aspiration for competition," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 412-443, December.
    15. Raluca Zoltan & Romulus Vancea, 2022. "Taylorism and Ambidexterity – A Systemic Perspective on Integrating Exploration and Exploitation in Organizations," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 768-775, September.
    16. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    17. Alan Hevner & Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau & Jacky Akoka & Nicolas Prat, 2018. "A pragmatic approach for identifying and managing design science research goals and evaluation criteria," Post-Print hal-02283783, HAL.
    18. Felipe A. Csaszar & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2010. "How Much to Copy? Determinants of Effective Imitation Breadth," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 661-676, June.
    19. Kauremaa, Jouni & Nurmilaakso, Juha-Miikka & Tanskanen, Kari, 2010. "E-business enabled operational linkages: The role of RosettaNet in integrating the telecommunications supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 343-357, October.
    20. Bruneel, Johan & Clarysse, Bart & Bobelyn, Annelies & Wright, Mike, 2020. "Liquidity events and VC-backed academic spin-offs: The role of search alliances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(10).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:3:y:2001:i:4:d:10.1023_a:1012876804965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.