IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v16y2025i7d10.1007_s13198-025-02820-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the effect of scarcity on demand in inventory models with data analytics

Author

Listed:
  • Saurabh Verma

    (University of Delhi)

  • Mona Verma

    (University of Delhi)

  • Chandra K. Jaggi

    (University of Delhi)

Abstract

Keeping afloat is essential to a company’s long-term wellness and growth in today’s fiercely competitive business environment. Due to technological advancement, a wide range of factors affect today’s market demand. One of the factors is the scarcity effect, defined as a limited quantity of items with a known expiration date due to an event, after which the unsold products have no significance. The present study incorporates a model for managing inventory with the scarcity effect, a psychological effect where people tend to infer that something is limited because of great desire or widespread acquisition. The present research considers a single-period inventory model with a single product for an event in the monopoly market. The model’s primary goal is the maximization of total profit when consumer demand is subject to the principle of scarcity. In addition to describing the model and its key features, a comparative analysis has been done without the scarcity effect. The results obtained support the present model. This validation strengthens the model’s accuracy. Further, the present model includes a numerical illustration and sensitivity analysis. Python 3.12.2 has been used to develop regression estimates of demand coefficients using sales data for event-specific products with a scarcity effect component. The results provide $${R}^{2}$$ R 2 a value of 0.95 assures the goodness of fit, and the p-value confirms the statistical significance of all coefficients. To establish the optimality of the inventory model analytically and graphically, Mathematica 12.3.0 has been used. The results show an optimal order quantity of 16,625 units per cycle and 972 units of lost sales per cycle. The cycle length is 56.06 days, yielding a total profit of ₹13,30,349 per cycle. Based on key findings and managerial insights, the present model assures businesses can increase profitability while minimizing lost sales cost, eventually boosting operational efficiency. Further, the model can be applied to various event-oriented specific products.

Suggested Citation

  • Saurabh Verma & Mona Verma & Chandra K. Jaggi, 2025. "Analyzing the effect of scarcity on demand in inventory models with data analytics," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(7), pages 2593-2608, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s13198-025-02820-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-025-02820-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-025-02820-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-025-02820-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roy, Arpita & Sana, Shib Sankar & Chaudhuri, Kripasindhu, 2012. "Optimal replenishment order for uncertain demand in three layer supply chain," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 2274-2282.
    2. Pal, Brojeswar & Sana, Shib Sankar & Chaudhuri, Kripasindhu, 2012. "A three layer multi-item production–inventory model for multiple suppliers and retailers," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 2704-2710.
    3. Maihami, Reza & Nakhai Kamalabadi, Isa, 2012. "Joint pricing and inventory control for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with partial backlogging and time and price dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 116-122.
    4. Nan Yang & Renyu Zhang, 2014. "Dynamic Pricing and Inventory Management Under Inventory-Dependent Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1077-1094, October.
    5. Gérard P. Cachon & Santiago Gallino & Marcelo Olivares, 2019. "Does Adding Inventory Increase Sales? Evidence of a Scarcity Effect in U.S. Automobile Dealerships," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1469-1485, April.
    6. AlDurgam, Mohammad & Adegbola, Kehinde & Glock, Christoph H., 2017. "A single-vendor single-manufacturer integrated inventory model with stochastic demand and variable production rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 335-350.
    7. Suresh Kumar Goyal & S.R. Singh & Dharmendra Yadav, 2017. "Economic order quantity model for imperfect lot with partial backordering under the effect of learning and advertisement dependent imprecise demand," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 29(2), pages 197-218.
    8. AlDurgham, M. & Adegbola, K. & Glock, C. H., 2017. "A single-vendor single-manufacturer integrated inventory model with stochastic demand and variable production rate," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 87594, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Subhajit Das & Amalesh Kumar Manna & Emad E. Mahmoud & Kholod M. Abualnaja & Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty & Ali Akbar Shaikh & Hijaz Ahmad, 2020. "Product Replacement Policy in a Production Inventory Model with Replacement Period-, Stock-, and Price-Dependent Demand," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-8, December.
    10. Harvey M. Wagner & Thomson M. Whitin, 1958. "Dynamic Version of the Economic Lot Size Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 89-96, October.
    11. Ajoy Hatibaruah & Sumit Saha, 2021. "An inventory model for ameliorating and deteriorating items with stock and price dependent demand and time dependent holding cost with preservation technology investment," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(1), pages 99-122.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katherinne Salas-Navarro & Whady F. Florez & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón, 2024. "A vendor-managed inventory model for a three-layer supply chain considering exponential demand, imperfect system, and remanufacturing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 332(1), pages 329-371, January.
    2. Janssen, Larissa & Claus, Thorsten & Sauer, Jürgen, 2016. "Literature review of deteriorating inventory models by key topics from 2012 to 2015," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 86-112.
    3. Ventura, José A. & Bunn, Kevin A. & Venegas, Bárbara B. & Duan, Lisha, 2021. "A coordination mechanism for supplier selection and order quantity allocation with price-sensitive demand and finite production rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. Sudip Adak & G. S. Mahapatra, 2021. "Effect of inspection and rework of probabilistic defective production on two-layer supply chain incorporating deterioration and reliability dependent demand," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(3), pages 565-578, June.
    5. Wu, Kan & Yuan, Xue-Ming, 2016. "Optimal production-inventory policy for an integrated multi-stage supply chain with time-varying demandAuthor-Name: Zhao, Shi Tao," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 364-379.
    6. Herbon, Avi, 2021. "An integrated manufacturer-buyer chain with bounded production cycle length," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    7. Chan, Chi Kin & Fang, Fei & Langevin, André, 2018. "Single-vendor multi-buyer supply chain coordination with stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 110-133.
    8. Heibatolah Sadeghi & Hêriş Golpîra & Faicel Hnaien & Cosimo Magazzino, 2023. "Pricing-inventory model with discrete demand and delivery orders," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 33(3), pages 119-139.
    9. Faranak Emtehani & Nasim Nahavandi & Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei, 2021. "A joint inventory–finance model for coordinating a capital-constrained supply chain with financing limitations," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-39, December.
    10. Dana Marsetiya Utama & Fakhrina Fahma Abdullah & Ikhlasul Amallynda & Teguh Baroto, 2024. "Integrated production-inventory model for multi-item raw materials with exponential quality degradation: a real case study," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(4), pages 1862-1887, December.
    11. Herbon, Avi, 2020. "An approximated solution to the constrained integrated manufacturer-buyer supply problem," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    12. Dharamender Singh & Anurag Jayswal & Majed G. Alharbi & Ali Akbar Shaikh, 2021. "An Investigation of a Supply Chain Model for Co-Ordination of Finished Products and Raw Materials in a Production System under Different Situations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    13. Yuan Jiang & Xu Guan & Yao Tang & Simiao Chen, 2022. "Strategic stocking for new products to signal quality information," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 65-83, January.
    14. Bikash Koli Dey & Hyesung Seok & Kwanghun Chung, 2024. "Optimal Decisions on Greenness, Carbon Emission Reductions, and Flexibility for Imperfect Production with Partial Outsourcing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-29, February.
    15. Utama, Dana Marsetiya & Santoso, Imam & Hendrawan, Yusuf & Dania, Wike Agustin Prima, 2022. "Integrated procurement-production inventory model in supply chain: A systematic review," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    16. Avijit Duary & Md Sadikur Rahman & Amalesh Kumar Manna & Ali Akbar Shaikh, 2025. "Optimal policy of an interval production problem with variable demand and warranty policy via $$0\_1$$ 0 _ 1 parametrized optimization technique," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(9), pages 2967-2982, September.
    17. Asif Iqbal Malik & Byung Soo Kim, 2020. "A Constrained Production System Involving Production Flexibility and Carbon Emissions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H., 2021. "The impact of controllable production rates on the performance of inventory systems: A systematic review of the literature," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 703-720.
    19. Herbon, Avi & David, Israel, 2023. "Optimal manufacturer's cost sharing ratio, shipping policy and production rate – A two-echelon supply chain," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 10(C).
    20. Mohammed Alkahtani & Muhammad Omair & Qazi Salman Khalid & Ghulam Hussain & Imran Ahmad & Catalin Pruncu, 2021. "A COVID-19 Supply Chain Management Strategy Based on Variable Production under Uncertain Environment Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-23, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s13198-025-02820-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.