IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v22y2013i4d10.1007_s10726-013-9351-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Connectedness Decision Paradigm: Group Decision, Negotiation and Leadership in World Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Melvin F. Shakun

    (New York University)

Abstract

We discuss connectedness, a dynamic unity relation experience. The Connectedness Decision Paradigm (CDP) is a formal, general systems-spirituality framework, technology-supported, for group decision and negotiation (GDN) and leadership in making “right” decisions. A right problem/solution is validated by a spiritual rationality validation test involving connectedness. A participant (agent) may experience connectedness with purposes (intended results). Purposes for which there is reciprocated (shared) purpose connectedness across agents constitute common ground for these agents. A basic idea is to identify and expand such common ground. Even in difficult problem solving, as with polarization, where there seems to be little or no common ground, a priori there is always the ultimate purpose common ground of connectedness with One (spirituality) from which other common ground as connectedness with the “other” can arise. Common ground can lead to additional common ground and to an agreed problem solution—itself constituting common ground—that can be tested for rightness. Our focus here is on human agents considered as spiritual purposeful complex adaptive systems in multiagent environments. The ideas are applicable to other agents with lesser or greater capabilities than humans according to their capabilities. Expanding earlier work, this commentary on CDP is also based on GDN 2012, 2013 meeting remarks by the author, as well as on a lecture, “Hope on the Edge of Chaos: The New Connectedness Paradigm in World Affairs”, Hamilton Hall, Salem, Massachusetts, February 2012. In presenting CDP, this commentary is also a call for problem solving frameworks for GDN and leadership, and solutions to world problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Melvin F. Shakun, 2013. "The Connectedness Decision Paradigm: Group Decision, Negotiation and Leadership in World Problems," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 599-615, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:22:y:2013:i:4:d:10.1007_s10726-013-9351-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-013-9351-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-013-9351-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-013-9351-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melvin F. Shakun, 1999. "An ESD Computer Culture for Intercultural Problem Solving and Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 237-249, May.
    2. Melvin F. Shakun, 2009. "Connectedness Problem Solving and Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 89-117, March.
    3. Melvin F. Shakun, 2005. "Multi-bilateral Multi-issue E-negotiation in E-commerce with a Tit-for-Tat Computer Agent," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 383-392, September.
    4. Pieter J. Beers & Henny P. A. Boshuizen & Paul A. Kirschner & Wim H. Gijselaers, 2006. "Common Ground, Complex Problems and Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 529-556, November.
    5. Melvin F. Shakun, 2001. "Unbounded Rationality," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 97-118, March.
    6. Melvin F. Shakun, 2003. "Right Problem Solving: Doing the Right Thing Right," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 463-476, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cecilia Rossignoli & Francesca Ricciardi & Sabrina Bonomi, 2018. "Organizing for Commons-Enabling Decision-Making Under Conflicting Institutional Logics in Social Entrepreneurship," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 417-443, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melvin F. Shakun, 2009. "Connectedness Problem Solving and Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 89-117, March.
    2. Jim Sheffield, 2004. "The Design of GSS-Enabled Interventions: A Habermasian Perspective," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 415-435, September.
    3. Dan Palmon & Ephraim F. Sudit, 2009. "Commercial Insurance of Financial Disclosure: Auditors’ Independence, and Investors’ Protection," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 27-40, January.
    4. Melvin F. Shakun, 2006. "ESD: A Formal Consciousness Model for International Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 491-510, September.
    5. Melvin F. Shakun, 2006. "Spiritual Rationality: Integrating Faith-Based and Secular-Based Problem Solving and Negotiation as Systems Design for Right Action," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Gulikers, Judith T.M. & Baartman, Liesbeth K.J. & Biemans, Harm J.A., 2010. "Facilitating evaluations of innovative, competence-based assessments: Creating understanding and involving multiple stakeholders," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 120-127, May.
    7. Daniel Ebakoleaneh Ufua, 2020. "Exploring the Effectiveness of Boundary Critique in an Intervention: a Case in the Niger Delta Region, Nigeria," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 485-499, October.
    8. Melvin F. Shakun, 2005. "Multi-bilateral Multi-issue E-negotiation in E-commerce with a Tit-for-Tat Computer Agent," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 383-392, September.
    9. Pham, Long & Teich, Jeffrey & Wallenius, Hannele & Wallenius, Jyrki, 2015. "Multi-attribute online reverse auctions: Recent research trends," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 1-9.
    10. Adams, Renée B. & Akyol, Ali C. & Verwijmeren, Patrick, 2018. "Director skill sets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 641-662.
    11. Daniel Druckman & Bennett Ramberg & Richard Harris, 2002. "Computer-Assisted International Negotiation: A Tool for Research and Practice," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 231-256, May.
    12. Céline Bérard & L.M., Cloutier & Luc Cassivi, 2017. "The effects of using system dynamics-based decision support models: testing policy-makers’ boundaries in a complex situation," Post-Print hal-02128255, HAL.
    13. Ronghuo Zheng & Tinglong Dai & Katia Sycara & Nilanjan Chakraborty, 2016. "Automated Multilateral Negotiation on Multiple Issues with Private Information," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 612-628, November.
    14. Guy Olivier Faure & Melvin F. Shakun, 1999. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Intercultural Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 183-185, May.
    15. Rudolf Vetschera & Michael Filzmoser & Ronald Mitterhofer, 2014. "An Analytical Approach to Offer Generation in Concession-Based Negotiation Processes," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 71-99, January.
    16. Patricia Alexander & Johan Loggerenberg & Hugo Lotriet & Jackie Phahlamohlaka, 2010. "The Use of the Repertory Grid for Collaboration and Reflection in a Research Context," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 479-504, September.
    17. Melvin F. Shakun, 2010. "Evolving and Taking CATNAPS to Negotiation/Problem Stories," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 417-419, September.
    18. Melvin F. Shakun, 2001. "Unbounded Rationality," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 97-118, March.
    19. Melvin F. Shakun, 2003. "Right Problem Solving: Doing the Right Thing Right," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 463-476, November.
    20. Hartnett, Elizabeth J. & Daniel, Elizabeth M. & Holti, Richard, 2012. "Client and consultant engagement in public sector IS projects," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 307-317.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:22:y:2013:i:4:d:10.1007_s10726-013-9351-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.