IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/flsman/v29y2017i3d10.1007_s10696-017-9278-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Re-marshalling in automated container yards with terminal appointment systems

Author

Listed:
  • Filip Covic

    (University of Hamburg)

Abstract

As a result of scarce land availability, growing competition and throughput, container terminals are increasing the stacking height of yard blocks to fulfil the demand for storage area. Due to inadequate retrieval information at initial stacking, shuffle moves can occur during retrieval operations as containers may be stacked in a sequence which does not correspond to the actual retrieval sequence. Automated stacking cranes can perform re-marshalling during periods of no crane workload to shift unproductive moves during retrieval operations to phases of idle time. Terminal appointment systems (TAS) enhance landside sequence information when external trucks (XT) announce their arrival beforehand. Under these circumstances, it is beneficial for terminal planers to understand the effects of using re-marshalling in combination with TAS. The purpose of this work is to introduce an online rule-based solution method for the re-marshalling problem with and without TAS. A simulation model of a fully operating yard block is used as environment to compare the proposed method with a benchmark heuristic from the literature. All tests are conducted for single and multiple Rail-Mounted-Gantry-Crane systems with different yard block sizes. It is also shown that solving the re-marshalling problem with the proposed algorithm generates results that reduce shuffle moves by 30% on average and by up to 50% in the best case, while always performing better in the worst case in comparison with not performing re-marshalling. Afterwards, influences on the method of selected TAS parameters are evaluated numerically. Results show that imprecise XT arrival information, not deviating above a certain threshold, significantly contribute to reducing congestion by mitigating XT waiting time and levelling arrival peaks. These benefits can be achieved without imposing restrictions on the arrival schedule preferred by XT companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Filip Covic, 2017. "Re-marshalling in automated container yards with terminal appointment systems," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 433-503, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:29:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10696-017-9278-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10696-017-9278-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10696-017-9278-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10696-017-9278-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Namboothiri, Rajeev & Erera, Alan L., 2008. "Planning local container drayage operations given a port access appointment system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 185-202, March.
    2. Caserta, Marco & Schwarze, Silvia & Voß, Stefan, 2012. "A mathematical formulation and complexity considerations for the blocks relocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 96-104.
    3. Chen, Gang & Govindan, Kannan & Yang, Zhong-Zhen & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Jiang, Liping, 2013. "Terminal appointment system design by non-stationary M(t)/Ek/c(t) queueing model and genetic algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 694-703.
    4. Changqian Guan & Rongfang (Rachel) Liu, 2009. "Container terminal gate appointment system optimization," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 11(4), pages 378-398, December.
    5. Phan, Mai-Ha & Kim, Kap Hwan, 2015. "Negotiating truck arrival times among trucking companies and a container terminal," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 132-144.
    6. Zehendner, Elisabeth & Feillet, Dominique, 2014. "Benefits of a truck appointment system on the service quality of inland transport modes at a multimodal container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 461-469.
    7. Maguire, A. & Ivey, S. & Golias, M.M & Lipinski, M.E, 2010. "Relieving Congestion at Intermodal Marine Container Terminals: Review of Tactical/Operational Strategies," 51st Annual Transportation Research Forum, Arlington, Virginia, March 11-13, 2010 207280, Transportation Research Forum.
    8. Zhao, Wenjuan & Goodchild, Anne V., 2010. "The impact of truck arrival information on container terminal rehandling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 327-343, May.
    9. Rommert Dekker & Patrick Voogd & Eelco Asperen, 2007. "Advanced methods for container stacking," Springer Books, in: Kap Hwan Kim & Hans-Otto Günther (ed.), Container Terminals and Cargo Systems, pages 131-154, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pfrommer, Jakob & Meyer, Anne & Tierney, Kevin, 2024. "Solving the unit-load pre-marshalling problem in block stacking storage systems with multiple access directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(3), pages 1054-1071.
    2. Lange, Ann-Kathrin & Nellen, Nicole & Jahn, Carlos, 2022. "Truck appointment systems: How can they be improved and what are their limits?," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 615-655, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    3. Hang Yu & Yiyun Deng & Leijie Zhang & Xin Xiao & Caimao Tan, 2022. "Yard Operations and Management in Automated Container Terminals: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Jin, Bo & Yu, Zhishan & Yu, Mingzhu, 2022. "Inbound container remarshaling problem in an automated container terminal," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong & Xie, Ying, 2022. "Service fairness and value of customer information for the stochastic container relocation problem under flexible service policy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azab, Ahmed & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "The block relocation problem with appointment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 680-694.
    2. Torkjazi, Mohammad & Huynh, Nathan & Shiri, Samaneh, 2018. "Truck appointment systems considering impact to drayage truck tours," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 208-228.
    3. Lange, Ann-Kathrin & Nellen, Nicole & Jahn, Carlos, 2022. "Truck appointment systems: How can they be improved and what are their limits?," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 615-655, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    4. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Xiaoju Zhang & Qingcheng Zeng & Zhongzhen Yang, 2019. "Optimization of truck appointments in container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(1), pages 125-145, March.
    6. Li, Dongjun & Dong, Jing-Xin & Song, Dong-Ping & Hicks, Christian & Singh, Surya Prakash, 2020. "Optimal contract design for the exchange of tradable truck permits at multiterminal ports," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Azab, Ahmed & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "Coordinating truck appointments with container relocations and retrievals in container terminals under partial appointments information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Lange, Ann-Kathrin & Kreuz, Felix & Langkau, Sven & Jahn, Carlos & Clausen, Uwe, 2020. "Defining the quota of truck appointment systems," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 211-246, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    9. Kap Hwan Kim & Sanghyuk Yi, 2021. "Utilizing information sources to reduce relocation of inbound containers," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(4), pages 726-749, December.
    10. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong & Xie, Ying, 2022. "Service fairness and value of customer information for the stochastic container relocation problem under flexible service policy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    11. María D. Gracia & Rosa G. González-Ramírez & Julio Mar-Ortiz, 2017. "The impact of lanes segmentation and booking levels on a container terminal gate congestion," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 403-432, December.
    12. Amir Gharehgozli & Nima Zaerpour & Rene Koster, 2020. "Container terminal layout design: transition and future," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 610-639, December.
    13. Mar-Ortiz, Julio & Castillo-García, Norberto & Gracia, María D., 2020. "A decision support system for a capacity management problem at a container terminal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    14. Ku, Dusan & Arthanari, Tiru S., 2016. "Container relocation problem with time windows for container departure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 1031-1039.
    15. Mohammad Torkjazi & Nathan Huynh & Ali Asadabadi, 2022. "Modeling the Truck Appointment System as a Multi-Player Game," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-25, July.
    16. Xiao, Tingting & Ha, Albert Y., 2018. "Optimal unloading and storage pricing for inbound containers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 210-228.
    17. Bowei Xu & Xiaoyan Liu & Yongsheng Yang & Junjun Li & Octavian Postolache, 2021. "Optimization for a Multi-Constraint Truck Appointment System Considering Morning and Evening Peak Congestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    19. Caldeira dos Santos, Murillo & Pereira, Fábio Henrique, 2021. "Development and application of a dynamic model for road port access and its impacts on port-city relationship indicators," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Schulte, Frederik & Lalla-Ruiz, Eduardo & González-Ramírez, Rosa G. & Voß, Stefan, 2017. "Reducing port-related empty truck emissions: A mathematical approach for truck appointments with collaboration," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 195-212.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:29:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10696-017-9278-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.