IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/finsto/v20y2016i1p99-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facelifting in utility maximization

Author

Listed:
  • Kasper Larsen
  • Halil Soner
  • Gordan Žitković

Abstract

We establish the existence and characterization of a primal and a dual facelift—discontinuity of the value function at the terminal time—for utility maximization in incomplete semimartingale-driven financial markets. Unlike in the lower and upper hedging problems, and somewhat unexpectedly, a facelift turns out to exist in utility maximization despite strict convexity in the objective function. In addition to discussing our results in their natural, Markovian environment, we also use them to show that the dual optimizer cannot be found in the set of countably additive (martingale) measures in a wide variety of situations. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Suggested Citation

  • Kasper Larsen & Halil Soner & Gordan Žitković, 2016. "Facelifting in utility maximization," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 99-121, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:20:y:2016:i:1:p:99-121
    DOI: 10.1007/s00780-015-0274-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00780-015-0274-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00780-015-0274-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kasper Larsen & Gordan v{Z}itkovi'c, 2011. "On utility maximization under convex portfolio constraints," Papers 1102.0346, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2013.
    2. Paolo Guasoni & Mikl'os R'asonyi & Walter Schachermayer, 2008. "Consistent price systems and face-lifting pricing under transaction costs," Papers 0803.4416, arXiv.org.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1533 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Julien Hugonnier & Dmitry Kramkov & Walter Schachermayer, 2005. "On Utility‐Based Pricing Of Contingent Claims In Incomplete Markets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 203-212, April.
    5. Uwe Wystup & Uwe Schmock & Steven E. Shreve, 2002. "Valuation of exotic options under shortselling constraints," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 143-172.
    6. Jean-François Chassagneux & Romuald Elie & Idris Kharroubi, 2015. "When terminal facelift enforces delta constraints," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 329-362, April.
    7. (**), Hui Wang & Jaksa Cvitanic & (*), Walter Schachermayer, 2001. "Utility maximization in incomplete markets with random endowment," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 259-272.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim Weston, 2016. "Stability of utility maximization in nonequivalent markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 511-541, April.
    2. Kasper Larsen & Halil Mete Soner & Gordan Žitković, 0. "Conditional Davis pricing," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-35.
    3. Umut Cetin & Kasper Larsen, 2020. "Uniqueness in Cauchy problems for diffusive real-valued strict local martingales," Papers 2007.15041, arXiv.org.
    4. Kasper Larsen & Halil Mete Soner & Gordan Žitković, 2020. "Conditional Davis pricing," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 565-599, July.
    5. Dylan Possamai & Nizar Touzi, 2020. "Is there a Golden Parachute in Sannikov's principal-agent problem?," Papers 2007.05529, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kasper Larsen & Halil Mete Soner & Gordan Žitković, 2016. "Facelifting in utility maximization," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 99-121, January.
    2. Kasper Larsen & H. Mete Soner & Gordan Zitkovic, 2014. "Facelifting in Utility Maximization," Papers 1404.2227, arXiv.org.
    3. Pietro Siorpaes, 2015. "Optimal investment and price dependence in a semi-static market," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 161-187, January.
    4. Kasper Larsen & Halil Mete Soner & Gordan Žitković, 2020. "Conditional Davis pricing," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 565-599, July.
    5. Kasper Larsen & Halil Mete Soner & Gordan Žitković, 0. "Conditional Davis pricing," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-35.
    6. Kasper Larsen & Halil Mete Soner & Gordan v{Z}itkovi'c, 2017. "Conditional Davis Pricing," Papers 1702.02087, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    7. Dylan Possamai & Nizar Touzi, 2020. "Is there a Golden Parachute in Sannikov's principal-agent problem?," Papers 2007.05529, arXiv.org.
    8. Keita Owari, 2011. "A Note on Utility Maximization with Unbounded Random Endowment," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 18(1), pages 89-103, March.
    9. Walter Schachermayer & Mihai Sîrbu & Erik Taflin, 2009. "In which financial markets do mutual fund theorems hold true?," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 49-77, January.
    10. Erhan Bayraktar & Xiang Yu, 2015. "Optimal Investment with Random Endowments and Transaction Costs: Duality Theory and Shadow Prices," Papers 1504.00310, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    11. Kallsen Jan & Kühn Christoph, 2006. "On utility-based derivative pricing with and without intermediate trades," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 24(4/2006), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Weidong Tian & Daisuke Yoshikawa, 2017. "Analyzing Equilibrium in Incomplete Markets with Model Uncertainty," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 17(2), pages 235-262, June.
    13. Yiqing Lin & Junjian Yang, 2016. "Utility maximization problem with random endowment and transaction costs: when wealth may become negative," Papers 1604.08224, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2016.
    14. Kim Weston, 2016. "Stability of utility maximization in nonequivalent markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 511-541, April.
    15. E. Nasakkala & J. Keppo, 2008. "Hydropower with Financial Information," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5-6), pages 503-529.
    16. Takaki Hayashi & Yuta Koike, 2017. "No arbitrage and lead-lag relationships," Papers 1712.09854, arXiv.org.
    17. Mark P. Owen & Gordan Žitković, 2009. "Optimal Investment With An Unbounded Random Endowment And Utility‐Based Pricing," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 129-159, January.
    18. Christoph Belak & An Chen & Carla Mereu & Robert Stelzer, 2014. "Optimal investment with time-varying stochastic endowments," Papers 1406.6245, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    19. Constantinos Kardaras, 2009. "Finitely additive probabilities and the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing," Papers 0911.5503, arXiv.org.
    20. Chr. Framstad, Nils, 2011. "On free lunches in random walk markets with short-sale constraints and small transaction costs, and weak convergence to Gaussian continuous-time processes," Memorandum 20/2011, Oslo University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Boundary layer; Convex analysis; Convex duality; Facelift; Financial mathematics; Incomplete markets; Markov processes; Utility maximization; Unspanned endowment; 91G10; 91G80; 60K35; C61; G11;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:20:y:2016:i:1:p:99-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.