IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurjtl/v8y2019i3d10.1007_s13676-018-0127-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New solution approaches for the train load planning problem

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Ambrosino

    (University of Genova)

  • Claudia Caballini

    (University of Genova)

Abstract

The present paper faces the train load planning problem in container terminals. The problem consists of assigning containers to rail wagons while maximizing the total priority of the containers loaded and minimizing the number of rehandles executed in the terminal yard. Two different heuristic approaches, based on an innovative way to compute weight limitations and on two 0/1 integer programming models, are proposed and compared on the basis of specific key performance indicators. The heuristic approaches are compared using random generated instances based on real-world data. An extensive computational analysis has been performed.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Ambrosino & Claudia Caballini, 2019. "New solution approaches for the train load planning problem," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(3), pages 299-325, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurjtl:v:8:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s13676-018-0127-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s13676-018-0127-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13676-018-0127-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13676-018-0127-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alumur, Sibel A. & Kara, Bahar Y. & Karasan, Oya E., 2012. "Multimodal hub location and hub network design," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 927-939.
    2. Francesco Parola & Anna Sciomachen, 2009. "Modal split evaluation of a maritime container terminal," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 11(1), pages 77-97, March.
    3. Nathalie Bostel & Pierre Dejax, 1998. "Models and Algorithms for Container Allocation Problems on Trains in a Rapid Transshipment Shunting Yard," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 370-379, November.
    4. Tierney, Kevin & Voß, Stefan & Stahlbock, Robert, 2014. "A mathematical model of inter-terminal transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 448-460.
    5. Daniela Ambrosino & Claudia Caballini & Silvia Siri, 2013. "A mathematical model to evaluate different train loading and stacking policies in a container terminal," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 15(3), pages 292-308, September.
    6. Vis, Iris F. A. & de Koster, Rene, 2003. "Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Vaidyanathan, Balachandran & Ahuja, Ravindra K. & Liu, Jian & Shughart, Larry A., 2008. "Real-life locomotive planning: New formulations and computational results," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 147-168, February.
    8. Woxenius, Johan & Bergqvist, Rickard, 2011. "Comparing maritime containers and semi-trailers in the context of hinterland transport by rail," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 680-688.
    9. Ambrosino, Daniela & Siri, Silvia, 2015. "Comparison of solution approaches for the train load planning problem in seaport terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 65-82.
    10. Anghinolfi, D. & Paolucci, M. & Sacone, S. & Siri, S., 2011. "Freight transportation in railway networks with automated terminals: A mathematical model and MIP heuristic approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 588-594, November.
    11. Mantovani, Serena & Morganti, Gianluca & Umang, Nitish & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Frejinger, Emma & Larsen, Eric, 2018. "The load planning problem for double-stack intermodal trains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 107-119.
    12. Wang, Wen Fei & Yun, Won Young, 2013. "Scheduling for inland container truck and train transportation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 349-356.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhongbin Zhao & Xifu Wang & Suxin Cheng & Wei Liu & Lijun Jiang, 2022. "A New Synchronous Handling Technology of Double Stack Container Trains in Sea-Rail Intermodal Terminals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1, September.
    2. SteadieSeifi, M. & Dellaert, N.P. & Nuijten, W. & Van Woensel, T. & Raoufi, R., 2014. "Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 1-15.
    3. Ambrosino, Daniela & Siri, Silvia, 2015. "Comparison of solution approaches for the train load planning problem in seaport terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 65-82.
    4. Behzad Behdani & Bart Wiegmans & Violeta Roso & Hercules Haralambides, 2020. "Port-hinterland transport and logistics: emerging trends and frontier research," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. Li, Jing-An & Leung, Stephen C.H. & Wu, Yue & Liu, Ke, 2007. "Allocation of empty containers between multi-ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 400-412, October.
    7. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    8. Amir Gharehgozli & Nima Zaerpour & Rene Koster, 2020. "Container terminal layout design: transition and future," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 610-639, December.
    9. Roy, Debjit & van Ommeren, Jan-Kees & de Koster, René & Gharehgozli, Amir, 2022. "Modeling landside container terminal queues: Exact analysis and approximations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 73-102.
    10. Qiu, Xuan & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Huang, George Q., 2015. "A bilevel storage pricing model for outbound containers in a dry port system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 65-83.
    11. Stefan Fedtke & Nils Boysen, 2017. "Gantry crane and shuttle car scheduling in modern rail–rail transshipment yards," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(2), pages 473-503, March.
    12. Upadhyay, Amit & Gu, Weihua & Bolia, Nomesh, 2017. "Optimal loading of double-stack container trains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-22.
    13. Leonard Heilig & Stefan Voß, 2017. "Inter-terminal transportation: an annotated bibliography and research agenda," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 35-63, March.
    14. Hilde Heggen & Kris Braekers & An Caris, 2018. "A multi-objective approach for intermodal train load planning," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(2), pages 341-366, March.
    15. Lu Zhen & Wenya Lv & Zheyi Tan & Bin Dong, 2022. "Container Transportation Scheduling Between Port Yards and the Hinterland in Yunfeng," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 250-266, May.
    16. Dongping Song, 2021. "A Literature Review, Container Shipping Supply Chain: Planning Problems and Research Opportunities," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-26, June.
    17. Xie, Ying & Song, Dong-Ping, 2018. "Optimal planning for container prestaging, discharging, and loading processes at seaport rail terminals with uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 88-109.
    18. Qu Hu & Bart Wiegmans & Francesco Corman & Gabriel Lodewijks, 2019. "Integration of inter-terminal transport and hinterland rail transport," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 807-831, September.
    19. Hyun Ji Park & Sung Won Cho & Abhilasha Nanda & Jin Hyoung Park, 2023. "Data-driven dynamic stacking strategy for export containers in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 170-195, March.
    20. Ulf Speer & Kathrin Fischer, 2017. "Scheduling of Different Automated Yard Crane Systems at Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 305-324, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurjtl:v:8:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s13676-018-0127-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.