IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v26y2025i7d10.1007_s10198-025-01767-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public versus private healthcare systems in the OECD area– a broad evaluation of performance

Author

Listed:
  • Per Molander

    (Arbor AB
    Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Educational Policy (IFAU))

Abstract

Healthcare systems can be categorised along the public/private axis into two main types: publicly administered systems and systems based on compulsory health insurance provided by the private sector. Within the OECD area, the latter group has expanded over time, particularly with the inclusion of new member states from Eastern Europe and Central and Latin America. This study compares the efficiency of these two models across the 38 member countries, utilising a broad spectrum of performance indicators developed by the OECD secretariat. Data from the most recent available year, typically 2021, were analysed. On average, performance improves with an increase in healthcare budgets; however, further enhancements come at rising costs. The analysis concludes that there is no evidence supporting the hypothesis that transitioning from a publicly administered system to a privately dominated system will enhance efficiency. By contrast, there is strong evidence that overall efficiency increases with the public share of financing. These conclusions also hold true for the more restricted group of OECD countries in Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Per Molander, 2025. "Public versus private healthcare systems in the OECD area– a broad evaluation of performance," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 26(7), pages 1163-1173, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-025-01767-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-025-01767-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-025-01767-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-025-01767-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beata Gavurova & Kristina Kocisova & Jakub Sopko, 2021. "Health system efficiency in OECD countries: dynamic network DEA approach," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Kelly, Jerry S., 1978. "Arrow Impossibility Theorems," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780124033504 edited by Shell, Karl.
    3. L. Garattini & Marco Badinella Martini, 2023. "Modeling European health systems: a theoretical exercise," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(8), pages 1249-1252, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruchuan Zhang & Aijun Li & Davo Ayuba Dahoro, 2024. "A new approach for vehicle-health system measurement by network data envelopment analysis and an application in the USA," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 14693-14727, June.
    2. Chen, Kuan-Chen & Lin, Sun-Yuan & Yu, Ming-Miin, 2022. "Exploring the efficiency of hospital and pharmacy utilizations in Taiwan: An application of dynamic network data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. H. Reiju Mihara, 1997. "Anonymity and neutrality in Arrow's Theorem with restricted coalition algebras," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 14(4), pages 503-512.
    4. Alvaro Almeida, 2024. "The trade-off between health system resiliency and efficiency: evidence from COVID-19 in European regions," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(1), pages 31-47, February.
    5. Armajac Raventós-Pujol & María J. Campión & Esteban Induráin, 2020. "Decomposition and Arrow-Like Aggregation of Fuzzy Preferences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Hannu Nurmi, 1989. "Computational Approaches to Bargaining and Choice," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 1(4), pages 407-426, October.
    7. Taradas Bandyopadhyay, 2011. "Choice procedures and power structure in social decisions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 37(4), pages 597-608, October.
    8. Hannu Nurmi, 1980. "Majority rule: Second thoughts and refutations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 743-765, December.
    9. Mario Fedrizzi & Janusz Kacprzyk & Hannu Nurmi, 1996. "How different are social choice functions: a rough sets approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 87-99, February.
    10. Perez, J. & Barba-Romero, S., 1995. "Three practical criteria of comparison among ordinal preference aggregating rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 473-487, September.
    11. Andranik Tangian, 2010. "Computational application of the mathematical theory of democracy to Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem (how dictatorial are Arrow’s dictators?)," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 35(1), pages 129-161, June.
    12. Andy Stirling, 2012. "Opening Up the Politics of Knowledge and Power in Bioscience," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-5, January.
    13. Randall, Alan, 1982. "Policy Science In The Land-Grant Complex: A Perspective On Natural Resource Economics," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(01), pages 1-8, July.
    14. Yusi Cheng & Xuejie Bai & Yung‐Ho Chiu, 2023. "Performance evaluation for health‐care sectors using a dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2237-2253, June.
    15. Andrew Stirling, 1998. "Risk at a turning point?," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 97-109, April.
    16. Peter Fishburn & Steven Brams, 1984. "Manipulability of voting by sincere truncation of preferences," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 397-410, January.
    17. Hannu Nurmi, 2001. "Resolving Group Choice Paradoxes Using Probabilistic and Fuzzy Concepts," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 177-199, March.
    18. See, Kok Fong & Md Hamzah, Nurhafiza & Yu, Ming-Miin, 2024. "Multi-period state healthcare efficiency for heterogeneous parallel hospital units," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. Vincenzo Denicolo, 2001. "An Elementary Proof of Arrow's Impossibility Theorem: Correction," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 52(1), pages 134-135, March.
    20. Peter Akioyamen & Mehmet A. Begen, 2023. "A Spatio-Temporal Analysis of OECD Member Countries’ Health Care Systems: Effects of Data Missingness and Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression on Inference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-18, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-025-01767-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.