IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i6d10.1007_s10668-023-04406-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renewable energy-based sustainable oilseed selection problem: a new integrated group decision model under dynamic uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Hossein Savoji

    (Shahed University)

  • Seyed Meysam Mousavi

    (Shahed University)

Abstract

Energy demands worldwide have been rising for a while and will continue in recent years. Most of today's energy conditions are met by non-renewable energy sources, which contaminate the conditions and consume pretty rapidly. Renewable energy alternatives, i.e., biomass, can be regarded as inexpensive, reliable, secure, and sustainable energy for ever-increasing people. To choose the best renewable energy alternative to meet the rising energy needs, various elements, such as economic, social, and environmental, must be considered by decision-makers. Thus, this paper examines a new weighting method to compute the criteria weights and experts weights with a new integrated dynamic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy set (DIVHFS). The introduced decision-maker weighting method is based on the direct and indirect decision matrixes. Afterward, the criteria weights are computed using a new maximizing deviation method and the proposed entropy approach under DIVHFS conditions. Afterward, a new soft computing ranking method is proposed based on the positive and negative ideal solution values under DIVHFS to rank the main alternatives that are related to oilseeds products. A sensitivity analysis is discussed on experts’ weights and criteria weights. In this respect, the amount of experts’ weights changes to measure its impacts on the criteria weights. Furthermore, the dependency of the criteria weights on final ranking results is obtained by changing the weights among each other. A comparative analysis is introduced to compare the proposed model with two existing ranking methods in the current literature. The results indicate that jatropha is the optimum oilseed to select in the presented case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Hossein Savoji & Seyed Meysam Mousavi, 2025. "Renewable energy-based sustainable oilseed selection problem: a new integrated group decision model under dynamic uncertainty," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 13257-13286, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04406-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04406-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04406-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-04406-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ren, Jingzheng, 2018. "Sustainability prioritization of energy storage technologies for promoting the development of renewable energy: A novel intuitionistic fuzzy combinative distance-based assessment approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 666-676.
    2. Mohamed Rafik N. Qureshi & Ram Karan Singh & Mohd. Abul Hasan, 2018. "Decision support model to select crop pattern for sustainable agricultural practices using fuzzy MCDM," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 641-659, April.
    3. Solangi, Yasir Ahmed & Longsheng, Cheng & Shah, Syed Ahsan Ali, 2021. "Assessing and overcoming the renewable energy barriers for sustainable development in Pakistan: An integrated AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 209-222.
    4. Ehsan Solgi & Hossein Gitinavard & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2021. "Sustainable High-Tech Brick Production with Energy-Oriented Consumption: An Integrated Possibilistic Approach Based on Criteria Interdependencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. R. N. Ossei-Bremang & F. Kemausuor, 2021. "A decision support system for the selection of sustainable biomass resources for bioenergy production," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 437-454, September.
    6. Bilgili, Faik & Zarali, Fulya & Ilgün, Miraç Fatih & Dumrul, Cüneyt & Dumrul, Yasemin, 2022. "The evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for sustainable development in Turkey using ‌intuitionistic‌ ‌fuzzy‌-TOPSIS method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1443-1458.
    7. Ping Lu & Xuan Yang & Zhou-Jing Wang, 2018. "Fuzzy Group Consensus Decision Making and Its Use in Selecting Energy-Saving and Low-Carbon Technology Schemes in Star Hotels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Li, Tao & Li, Ang & Guo, Xiaopeng, 2020. "The sustainable development-oriented development and utilization of renewable energy industry——A comprehensive analysis of MCDM methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    9. Shelby A. Flint & Ruth G. Shaw & Nicholas R. Jordan, 2021. "Effects of Selection Regime on Invasive Characteristics in an Emerging Biomass Crop, Switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahadian Dadan & Firli Anisah & Dinçer Hasan & Yüksel Serhat & Hacıoğlu Ümit & Gherghina Ştefan Cristian & Aksoy Tamer, 2023. "An Evaluation of E7 Countries’ Sustainable Energy Investments: A Decision-Making Approach with Spherical Fuzzy Sets," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz & Magdalena Zioło & Marek Dylewski, 2021. "Dynamic Analysis of the Similarity of Objects in Research on the Use of Renewable Energy Resources in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Huibing Cheng & Shanshui Zheng & Jianghong Feng, 2022. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Method for Sustainable Ferry Operator Selection: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Hernández-Torres, José Antonio & Sánchez-Lozano, Daniel & Sánchez-Herrera, Reyes & Vera, David & Torreglosa, Juan P., 2025. "Integrated multi-criteria decision-making approach for power generation technology selection in sustainable energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Li, He & Jiang, Dengying & Fang, Debin & Xing, Zeyu, 2025. "A MAGDM method based on signed distance and improved HTFWA operator for green electricity retailer selection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    6. Khan, Feroz & Ali, Yousaf, 2022. "Moving towards a sustainable circular bio-economy in the agriculture sector of a developing country," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi & Ali Saeed Almuflih & Janpriy Sharma & Mohit Tyagi & Shubhendu Singh & Naif Almakayeel, 2022. "Assessment of the Climate-Smart Agriculture Interventions towards the Avenues of Sustainable Production–Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Jinyi Hu, 2023. "Linguistic Multiple-Attribute Decision Making Based on Regret Theory and Minimax-DEA," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Pedro Ponce & Citlaly Pérez & Aminah Robinson Fayek & Arturo Molina, 2022. "Solar Energy Implementation in Manufacturing Industry Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Fuzzy TOPSIS and S4 Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Yunpeng Sun & Ruoya Jia & Asif Razzaq & Qun Bao, 2023. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Drivers of China’s geographical renewable energy development: evidence from spatial association network structure approaches," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4115-4163, December.
    11. Dorokhov, V.V. & Kuznetsov, G.V. & Vershinina, K.Yu. & Strizhak, P.A., 2021. "Relative energy efficiency indicators calculated for high-moisture waste-based fuel blends using multiple-criteria decision-making," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    12. Faruk Dayi & Ali Cilesiz & Mustafa Yucel, 2024. "Strategic Management of Clean Energy Investments: Financial Performance Insights by Using BWM-based VIKOR and TOPSIS Methods," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 566-574, September.
    13. Li, Jiaman & Dong, Xiucheng & Dong, Kangyin, 2022. "How much does financial inclusion contribute to renewable energy growth? Ways to realize green finance in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 760-771.
    14. Ifaei, Pouya & Tayerani Charmchi, Amir Saman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yang, Rebecca Jing & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "A data-driven analytical roadmap to a sustainable 2030 in South Korea based on optimal renewable microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    15. Xiaokai Meng & Ghulam Muhammad Shaikh, 2023. "Evaluating Environmental, Social, and Governance Criteria and Green Finance Investment Strategies Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    16. José Carlos Romero & Pedro Linares, 2021. "Multiple Criteria Decision-Making as an Operational Conceptualization of Energy Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao & Chang, Yu-Fang, 2023. "Does green finance promote renewable energy? Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    18. Jin, Haifeng, 2023. "Analyzing factors and resource policymaking options for sustainable resource management and carbon neutrality in mining industry: Empirical study in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    19. Mohammad Dalvi-Esfahani & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Rabab Ali Abumalloh & Ramayah Thurasamy & Muhammad Shakil Ahmad, 2025. "Investigating the interrelationships between the barriers of green computing adoption: TISM-MICMAC-DEMATEL method," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 507-570, February.
    20. Nebiyu Kedir & Phuong H. D. Nguyen & Citlaly Pérez & Pedro Ponce & Aminah Robinson Fayek, 2023. "Systematic Literature Review on Fuzzy Hybrid Methods in Photovoltaic Solar Energy: Opportunities, Challenges, and Guidance for Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-38, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04406-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.