IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i4d10.1007_s10668-023-03107-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing quality tourism development in China: an analysis based on the degree of mismatch and its influencing factors

Author

Listed:
  • Hong He

    (Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications)

  • Shouheng Tuo

    (Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications)

  • Kewei Lei

    (Xi’an Eurasia University)

  • Aixiong Gao

    (Shaanxi Normal University
    Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications)

Abstract

The quality development of tourism is an important means of implementing China’s quality development strategy, meeting people’s aspirations for a better life and enhancing China’s tourism competitiveness. On the basis of defining the concept of high-quality tourism development, this paper constructs an evaluation system for high-quality tourism development that includes five dimensions: tourism economic scale, tourism development speed, tourism supply quality, tourism industry structure and tourism industry efficiency. Using the entropy value method, multi-indicator comprehensive index method and health distance model, we measure the level of high-quality tourism development and its mismatch in 30 Chinese provinces (municipalities and regions) from 2010 to 2019, and analyze the factors affecting high-quality tourism development in China. The findings show that: (1) the overall level of quality development in China’s tourism industry is not high, with a low degree of mismatch dominating, and a trend from mismatch to match. The high-quality development of the national tourism industry is mainly due to the high quality of tourism supply and the comprehensive benefits of tourism. The role of tourism industry structure in promoting high-quality tourism development in China has not yet been fully exploited. (2) The four major regions of China have seen high-quality tourism development, with the eastern region generally outperforming the central, western and northeastern regions. The gap between the four regions has narrowed, but the performance is unstable. It is difficult to change the pattern of quality tourism development in the four regions in the short term. (3) The ranking of each province in terms of the level of quality tourism development remains relatively stable, but the average level varies considerably. Spatial differentiation within the four regions is evident, most notably in the east. (4) Policymakers should focus their policies on optimizing the structure of the tourism industry, implementing differentiated development strategies and enhancing the capacity for coordinated regional development, with a focus on the quality of tourism supply and the overall benefits of tourism in the western region.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong He & Shouheng Tuo & Kewei Lei & Aixiong Gao, 2024. "Assessing quality tourism development in China: an analysis based on the degree of mismatch and its influencing factors," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 9525-9552, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03107-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03107-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03107-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03107-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03107-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.