IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i1d10.1007_s10668-022-02831-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Inherent Interconnectedness and other Salient Characteristics of Nature crucial for Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Gopal Babu

    (Ajay Kumar Garg Engineering College)

  • Santosh Satya

    (Indian Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Sustainability is understood as a dynamic balance in economic, environmental, and social dimensions to fulfill all human needs for all generations at all times. However, with the increasing signs of losing the dynamic balance between socio-economic human living and the rest of Nature, the survival of the human species itself is in question. Efforts being made worldwide through the United Nations to restore this balance have shown marginal impacts at ground level. Though Nature, when observed closely, is easily visible as a dynamically evolving self-sustainable system, but, generally this fact is not considered/overlooked while planning sustainable developmental activities. Therefore, in the present paper, an effort has been made to uncover these inherent characteristics of Nature responsible for its dynamic sustainability. Various well-established pieces of evidence from ecological and modern sciences, arguments, and philosophical and spiritual aspects are discussed which show that there are fundamental characteristics of Nature i.e..—interconnectedness and coexistence that exist everywhere even at a sub-atomic level. These characteristics are essential for designing/achieving sustainable development programs. Based on the evolved characteristics, a holistic co-existential model ensuring dynamic sustainability for all generations at all times is proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gopal Babu & Santosh Satya, 2024. "Understanding the Inherent Interconnectedness and other Salient Characteristics of Nature crucial for Sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 2493-2505, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02831-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02831-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02831-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02831-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiffany M. Knight & Michael W. McCoy & Jonathan M. Chase & Krista A. McCoy & Robert D. Holt, 2005. "Trophic cascades across ecosystems," Nature, Nature, vol. 437(7060), pages 880-883, October.
    2. Prerna Jain & Pragati Jain, 2020. "Are the Sustainable Development Goals really sustainable? A policy perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1642-1651, November.
    3. Caradonna, Jeremy L., 2014. "Sustainability: A History," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199372409, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henry Kuswantoro & Mahfud Sholihin & Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta, 2023. "Exploring the implementation of sustainable development goals: a comparison between private and state-owned enterprises in Indonesia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 10799-10819, October.
    2. Eran Feitelson & Eliahu Stern, 2023. "The double negative approach to sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2109-2121, August.
    3. Hametner, Markus, 2022. "Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Vincenzo Formisano & Bernardino Quattrociocchi & Maria Fedele & Mario Calabrese, 2018. "From Viability to Sustainability: The Contribution of the Viable Systems Approach (VSA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Talis Tisenkopfs & Emils Kilis & Mikelis Grivins & Anda Adamsone-Fiskovica, 2019. "Whose ethics and for whom? Dealing with ethical disputes in agri-food governance," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 353-364, June.
    6. Rui Jun Qin & Ho Hon Leung, 2021. "Becoming a Traditional Village: Heritage Protection and Livelihood Transformation of a Chinese Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Fung, Yi-Ning & Chan, Hau-Ling & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Liu, Rong, 2021. "Sustainable product development processes in fashion: Supply chains structures and classifications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    8. Livio Cricelli & Serena Strazzullo, 2021. "The Economic Aspect of Digital Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Nian-Feng Wan & Liwan Fu & Matteo Dainese & Yue-Qing Hu & Lars Pødenphant Kiær & Forest Isbell & Christoph Scherber, 2022. "Plant genetic diversity affects multiple trophic levels and trophic interactions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Leah V. Gibbons, 2020. "Regenerative—The New Sustainable?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Long Guo & Dongsheng Sun & Muhammad Akib Warraich & Abdul Waheed, 2023. "Does industry 5.0 model optimize sustainable performance of Agri‐enterprises? Real‐time investigation from the realm of stakeholder theory and domain," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2507-2516, August.
    12. Teun Wolters, 2022. "Why is ecological sustainability so difficult to achieve? An in‐context discussion of conceptual barriers," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 2025-2039, December.
    13. Edith Johana Medina-Hernández & María José Fernández-Gómez, 2024. "Multi-way Analysis of the Gender Dimension of the Sustainable Development Goals," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 172(2), pages 517-541, March.
    14. Shivam Gupta & Mahsa Motlagh & Jakob Rhyner, 2020. "The Digitalization Sustainability Matrix: A Participatory Research Tool for Investigating Digitainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-27, November.
    15. Caixia Ivy Gan & Ruth Soukoutou & Denise Maria Conroy, 2022. "Sustainability Framing of Controlled Environment Agriculture and Consumer Perceptions: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Silvia Bacci & Bruno Bertaccini & Ester Macrì & Anna Pettini, 2024. "Measuring sustainability consciousness in Italy," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 4751-4778, October.
    17. Kyung Ryul Park & Young Shil Park, 2024. "Addressing institutional challenges in sustainable development goals implementation: Lessons from the Republic of Korea," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 1354-1369, February.
    18. Amoako, Kwame Oduro & Lord, Beverley R. & Dixon, Keith, 2021. "Narrative accounting for mining in Ghana: An old defence against a new threat?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    19. Diaz-Balteiro, L & González-Pachón, J. & Romero, C., 2017. "Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 607-616.
    20. Christian Tym, 2023. "The Myth of Counter‐modern Ontologies: Indigenous People and the Modern Politics of Extractivism in Ecuador," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(4), pages 714-738, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02831-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.