IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i12d10.1007_s10668-024-04472-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological security assessment of urban park landscape using the DPSIR model and EW-PCA method

Author

Listed:
  • Yanyan Xu

    (Shenyang Institute of Technology
    Woosuk University)

  • Hao Wang

    (Woosuk University)

  • Kejia Zhang

    (Woosuk University)

  • Yue Han

    (Fuzhou University of International Studies and Trade)

Abstract

Urban park landscapes (UPL) play a pivotal role in enhancing urban ecological environment, showcasing modern urban civilization, and elevating the overall environmental quality within the city. However, the increasing pace of urbanization poses a challenge to the ecological security of UPL. This study employs the driving, pressure, state, impact, response model, selecting 27 indicators tailored to UPL characteristics to construct an ecological security assessment system. Utilizing the entropy weight-principal component analysis (EW-PCA) method, the comprehensive assessment index serves as the training dataset for the backpropagation neural network. This UPL ecological security assessment result undergoes optimization and rating for detailed analysis. Examining ecological and economic data for a city between 2001 and 2020, employing the EW-PCA and BPNN methods yielded comprehensive indices of 0.55 and 0.47, respectively. The ecological security of UPL was generally high, with controllable ecological security challenges. Despite variations in 2020, the ecological security levels determined by both methods each year remained consistent and did not surpass the acceptable threshold. The comprehensive assessment results reveal that indicators related to pressure, state, and response significantly impact the landscape ecology security of city parks. This offers a theoretical basis and direction for ecological security governance. The research and assessment findings indicate that the ecological security of UPL generally maintained a favorable level with a fluctuating trend. However, a decline in UPL security in 2019 highlighted emerging issues, particularly the serious threat to the landscape ecology system in the city center. Consequently, strict control over newly added construction land, optimization of construction land distribution, and dynamic monitoring and prevention of industrial plants, roads, and residential areas are crucial. Improvements in the production and living environment of rural residents, enhancement of construction land's intensive utilization, and prevention of large-scale damage to ecological landscapes such as farmland are imperative.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanyan Xu & Hao Wang & Kejia Zhang & Yue Han, 2024. "Ecological security assessment of urban park landscape using the DPSIR model and EW-PCA method," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 31301-31321, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04472-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04472-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04472-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-024-04472-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Bo & Bai, Yang & Wong, Christina P. & Xu, Xibao & Alatalo, Juha M., 2019. "China’s ecological civilization program–Implementing ecological redline policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 111-114.
    2. Xingxing Jin & Luyao Wei & Yi Wang & Yuqi Lu, 2021. "Construction of ecological security pattern based on the importance of ecosystem service functions and ecological sensitivity assessment: a case study in Fengxian County of Jiangsu Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 563-590, January.
    3. Linfeng Xu & Xuan Liu & De Tong & Zhixin Liu & Lirong Yin & Wenfeng Zheng, 2022. "Forecasting Urban Land Use Change Based on Cellular Automata and the PLUS Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Liu, Xuan & Kong, Minghui & Tong, De & Zeng, Xiaoyou & Lai, Yani, 2022. "Property rights and adjustment for sustainable development during post-productivist transitions in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    5. Kevin Loughran, 2020. "Urban parks and urban problems: An historical perspective on green space development as a cultural fix," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(11), pages 2321-2338, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Gebing & Li, Guozhi & Dilanchiev, Azer & Kazimova, Asli, 2023. "Promotion of green financing: Role of renewable energy and energy transition in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 769-775.
    2. Tae-Soo Ha & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2023. "Distributive Justice, Goal Clarity, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Moderating Role of Transactional and Transformational Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Feng, Xinzhen & Zhou, Dequn & Hussain, Tufail, 2024. "An investigation of fintech governance, natural resources and government stability on sustainability: Policy suggestions under the SDGs theme," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    4. Xinke Wang & Xiangqun Xie & Zhenfeng Wang & Hong Lin & Yan Liu & Huili Xie & Xingzhao Liu, 2022. "Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Security Pattern Based on the MCR Model: A Case Study of the Minjiang River Basin in Eastern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Shengwang Bao & Wanglai Cui & Fan Yang, 2024. "Future land use prediction and optimization strategy of Zhejiang Greater Bay Area coupled with ecological security multi-scenario pattern," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Huanhuan Xiong & Xuejing Wang & Xinrui Hu, 2023. "Research on the Duality of China’s Marine Fishery Carbon Emissions and Its Coordination with Economic Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Harik, G. & Alameddine, I. & Zurayk, R. & El-Fadel, M., 2023. "Uncertainty in forecasting land cover land use at a watershed scale: Towards enhanced sustainable land management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    8. Ning He & Wenxian Guo & Hongxiang Wang & Long Yu & Siyuan Cheng & Lintong Huang & Xuyang Jiao & Wenxiong Chen & Haotong Zhou, 2023. "Temporal and Spatial Variations in Landscape Habitat Quality under Multiple Land-Use/Land-Cover Scenarios Based on the PLUS-InVEST Model in the Yangtze River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Liu, Lijun & Chu, Jingjie & Anderson, James L. & Xu, Jintao, 2021. "Sustainability Comparisons in the Triple Bottom Line for Chinese Fisheries," EfD Discussion Paper 21-1, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    10. Yindan Zhang & Yuanyuan Li, 2023. "Society 5.0 versus Industry 5.0: An examination of industrialization models in driving sustainable development from a normative stakeholder theory perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3786-3795, October.
    11. Kalli, Rajesh & Jena, Pradyot Ranjan & Timilsina, Raja Rajendra & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Sonobe, Tetsushi, 2024. "Effect of irrigation on farm efficiency in tribal villages of Eastern India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    12. Vanesa Castán Broto, 2020. "Beyond tabulated utopias: Action and contradiction in urban environments," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(11), pages 2371-2379, August.
    13. Rao Ma & Wendong Lv & Yao Zhao, 2022. "The Impact of TMT Experience Heterogeneity on Enterprise Innovation Quality: Empirical Analysis on Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Xiaobing Le & Xinxin Shao & Kuo Gao, 2023. "The Relationship between Urbanization and Consumption Upgrading of Rural Residents under the Sustainable Development: An Empirical Study Based on Mediation Effect and Threshold Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Cai, Liping & Wang, Hui & Liu, Yanxu & Fan, Donglin & Li, Xiaoxiao, 2022. "Is potential cultivated land expanding or shrinking in the dryland of China? Spatiotemporal evaluation based on remote sensing and SVM," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Bohan Zhang & Jianfu Ma & Muhammad Asghar Khan & Valentina Repnikova & Kseniia Shidlovskaya & Sergey Barykin & Muhammad Salman Ahmad, 2023. "The Effect of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Foreign Direct Investment in the Era of Global Value Chain: Evidence from the Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Guang Chen & Jian Gong, 2025. "Pre-Assessment Research of Regional Spatial Planning from the Perspective of Spatial Evolution," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, March.
    18. Jawed Mustafa & Fahad Awjah Almehmadi & Saeed Alqaed & Mohsen Sharifpur, 2022. "Building a Sustainable Energy Community: Design and Integrate Variable Renewable Energy Systems for Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Hailiang, Zeng & Chau, Ka Yin & Waqas, Muhammad, 2023. "Does green finance and renewable energy promote tourism for sustainable development: Empirical evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 660-671.
    20. Xiuzhen, Xie & Zheng, Wenxiu & Umair, Muhammad, 2022. "Testing the fluctuations of oil resource price volatility: A hurdle for economic recovery," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04472-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.