IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i12d10.1007_s10668-023-03698-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenging the status quo in invasive species assessment using mechanistic physiologically based demographic modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Luigi Ponti

    (Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie, l’energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile (ENEA), Centro Ricerche Casaccia
    Center for the Analysis of Sustainable Agricultural Systems)

  • Andrew Paul Gutierrez

    (Center for the Analysis of Sustainable Agricultural Systems
    University of California)

Abstract

The increased incidence of invasive species introductions is a hallmark of global change, but their associated environmental and economic impacts are vastly underestimated. Assessing and managing the impact of invasive species requires understanding their weather driven dynamics as a basis for predicting their potential geographic distribution and relative abundance. Current de-facto standards for invasive species assessment are correlative approaches lacking mechanistic underpinnings, and hence fail to capture the weather driven biology limiting their explanatory and predictive capacity to forewarn policy makers of species invasiveness (i.e., its potential geographic distribution and relative abundance under extant and/or climate change weather). The idiosyncratic time-place nature of biological invasions and the inability of correlative approaches to incorporate biological information call for development of a unifying prospective approach across species. Physiologically based demographic models (PBDMs) provide a holistic basis for assessment of invasive species addressing many limitations of correlative approaches while accommodating higher level of biological complexity using a similar number of parameters. We use the South American tomato pinworm Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) as a case study in the Palearctic and compare the predictions of our PBDM model to those of three analyses based on the correlative CLIMEX model. The PBDM outperformed CLIMEX with comparable CLIMEX predictions only after the pest had reached its potential geographic distribution (i.e., post hoc), using 6–10 vs. 13 parameters, respectively. We suggest creating dedicated laboratories to gather appropriate biological data and developing generalized software to build mechanistic models for assessing invasive species of any taxa.

Suggested Citation

  • Luigi Ponti & Andrew Paul Gutierrez, 2024. "Challenging the status quo in invasive species assessment using mechanistic physiologically based demographic modeling," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 29933-29956, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03698-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03698-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03698-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03698-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilioli, G. & Pasquali, S. & Tramontini, S. & Riolo, F., 2013. "Modelling local and long-distance dispersal of invasive chestnut gall wasp in Europe," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 281-290.
    2. Christophe Diagne & Boris Leroy & Anne-Charlotte Vaissière & Rodolphe E. Gozlan & David Roiz & Ivan Jarić & Jean-Michel Salles & Corey J. A. Bradshaw & Franck Courchamp, 2021. "High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide," Nature, Nature, vol. 592(7855), pages 571-576, April.
    3. Gilioli, Gianni & Pasquali, Sara & Marchesini, Enrico, 2016. "A modelling framework for pest population dynamics and management: An application to the grape berry moth," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 348-357.
    4. Regev, U. & Gutierrez, A. P. & Schreiber, S. J. & Zilberman, D., 1998. "Biological and economic foundations of renewable resource exploitation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 227-242, September.
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0244005 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Corey J. A. Bradshaw & Boris Leroy & Céline Bellard & David Roiz & Céline Albert & Alice Fournier & Morgane Barbet-Massin & Jean-Michel Salles & Frédéric Simard & Franck Courchamp, 2016. "Massive yet grossly underestimated global costs of invasive insects," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    7. Christophe Diagne & Boris Leroy & Anne-Charlotte Vaissière & Rodolphe E. Gozlan & David Roiz & Ivan Jarić & Jean-Michel Salles & Corey J. A. Bradshaw & Franck Courchamp, 2021. "High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide," Nature, Nature, vol. 592(7855), pages 571-576, April.
    8. Julian Elliott & Rebecca Lawrence & Jan C. Minx & Olufemi T. Oladapo & Philippe Ravaud & Britta Tendal Jeppesen & James Thomas & Tari Turner & Per Olav Vandvik & Jeremy M. Grimshaw, 2021. "Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis," Nature, Nature, vol. 600(7889), pages 383-385, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danish A. Ahmed & Phillip J. Haubrock & Ross N. Cuthbert & Alok Bang & Ismael Soto & Paride Balzani & Ali Serhan Tarkan & Rafael L. Macêdo & Laís Carneiro & Thomas W. Bodey & Francisco J. Oficialdegui, 2023. "Recent advances in availability and synthesis of the economic costs of biological invasions," Post-Print hal-04148456, HAL.
    2. Antonín Kouba & Francisco J Oficialdegui & Ross N Cuthbert & Melina Kourantidou & Josie South & Elena Tricarico & Rodolphe E Gozlan & Franck Courchamp & Phillip J Haubrock, 2022. "Identifying economic costs and knowledge gaps of invasive aquatic crustaceans," Post-Print hal-03860579, HAL.
    3. Thomas W Bodey & Zachary T Carter & Phillip J Haubrock & Ross N Cuthbert & Melissa J Welsh & Christophe Diagne & Franck Courchamp, 2022. "Building a synthesis of economic costs of biological invasions in New Zealand," Post-Print hal-03860523, HAL.
    4. Priscila Villalobos Perna & Mirko Di Febbraro & Maria Laura Carranza & Flavio Marzialetti & Michele Innangi, 2023. "Remote Sensing and Invasive Plants in Coastal Ecosystems: What We Know So Far and Future Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Zhenan Jin & Wentao Yu & Haoxiang Zhao & Xiaoqing Xian & Kaiting Jing & Nianwan Yang & Xinmin Lu & Wanxue Liu, 2022. "Potential Global Distribution of Invasive Alien Species, Anthonomus grandis Boheman, under Current and Future Climate Using Optimal MaxEnt Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Daijun Liu & Philipp Semenchuk & Franz Essl & Bernd Lenzner & Dietmar Moser & Tim M. Blackburn & Phillip Cassey & Dino Biancolini & César Capinha & Wayne Dawson & Ellie E. Dyer & Benoit Guénard & Evan, 2023. "The impact of land use on non-native species incidence and number in local assemblages worldwide," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Sally E. Street & Jorge S. Gutiérrez & William L. Allen & Isabella Capellini, 2023. "Human activities favour prolific life histories in both traded and introduced vertebrates," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Xiaozhou Ye & Or Shalev & Christoph Ratzke, 2025. "Biotic resistance predictably shifts microbial invasion regimes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Ismael Soto & Ross N Cuthbert & Antonín Kouba & César Capinha & Anna Turbelin & Emma J Hudgins & Christophe Diagne & Franck Courchamp & Phillip J Haubrock, 2022. "Global economic costs of herpetofauna invasions," Post-Print hal-03860530, HAL.
    10. Michael Opoku Adomako & Sergio Roiloa & Fei-Hai Yu, 2022. "The COVID-19 Restrictions and Biological Invasion: A Global Terrestrial Ecosystem Perspective on Propagule Pressure and Invasion Trajectory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-11, November.
    11. Pérez, Giovanny & Vilà, Montserrat & Gallardo, Belinda, 2022. "Potential impact of four invasive alien plants on the provision of ecosystem services in Europe under present and future climatic scenarios," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    12. Marine Robuchon & Camille Bernery & Ana Cristina Cardoso & Cheikh Abdou Khadre Mbacké Dia & Franck Courchamp & Christophe Diagne & Eugenio Gervasini & Gustavo Heringer & Sandrine Pavoine & David Renau, 2025. "Conservation paradoxes and challenges in invasive alien species with economic costs," Post-Print hal-04993757, HAL.
    13. Melina Kourantidou & Laura N H Verbrugge & Phillip J Haubrock & Ross N Cuthbert & Elena Angulo & Inkeri Ahonen & Michelle Cleary & Jannike Falk-Andersson & Lena Granhag & Sindri Gíslason & Brooks Kais, 2022. "The economic costs, management and regulation of biological invasions in the Nordic countries," Post-Print hal-03860518, HAL.
    14. Rebecca A. Clement & Hyoseok Lee & Nicholas C. Manoukis & Yelena M. Pacheco & Fallon Ross & Mark S. Sisterson & Christopher L. Owen, 2025. "Addressing Biological Invasions in Agriculture with Big Data in an Informatics Age," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-34, May.
    15. Yemshanov, Denys & Haight, Robert G. & MacQuarrie, Chris J.K. & Simpson, Mackenzie & Koch, Frank H. & Ryan, Kathleen & Bullas-Appleton, Erin, 2022. "Hierarchical governance in invasive species survey campaigns," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    16. Tayna Sousa Duque & Iasmim Marcella Souza & Débora Sampaio Mendes & Ricardo Siqueira da Silva & Danielle Piuzana Mucida & Francisca Daniele da Silva & Daniel Valadão Silva & José Barbosa dos Santos, 2023. "Ecological Niche Modeling of Invasive Macrophyte ( Urochloa subquadripara ) and Co-Occurrence with South American Natives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, August.
    17. Emma J. Hudgins & Ross N. Cuthbert & Phillip J. Haubrock & Nigel G. Taylor & Melina Kourantidou & Dat Nguyen & Alok Bang & Anna J. Turbelin & Desika Moodley & Elizabeta Briski & Syrmalenia G. Kotronak, 2023. "Unevenly distributed biological invasion costs among origin and recipient regions," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 1113-1124, September.
    18. Pierre Courtois & César Martinez & Alban Thomas, 2023. "Spatial priorities for invasive alien species control in protected areas," Post-Print hal-04040360, HAL.
    19. Shu-ya Fan & Qiang Yang & Shao-peng Li & Trevor S. Fristoe & Marc W. Cadotte & Franz Essl & Holger Kreft & Jan Pergl & Petr Pyšek & Patrick Weigelt & John Kartesz & Misako Nishino & Jan J. Wieringa & , 2023. "A latitudinal gradient in Darwin’s naturalization conundrum at the global scale for flowering plants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Ross N Cuthbert & Christophe Diagne & Emma J Hudgins & Anna Turbelin & Danish A Ahmed & Céline Albert & Thomas W Bodey & Elizabeta Briski & Franz Essl & Phillip J Haubrock & Rodolphe E Gozlan & Natali, 2022. "Biological invasion costs reveal insufficient proactive management worldwide," Post-Print hal-03860581, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03698-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.