IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v25y2023i7d10.1007_s10668-022-02331-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of the best model to predict optical properties of water

Author

Listed:
  • Wessam El-Ssawy

    (Agricultural Engineering Research Institute (AEnRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC))

  • Hosam Elhegazy

    (Future University in Egypt)

  • Heba Abd-Elrahman

    (Agricultural Engineering Research Institute (AEnRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC))

  • Mohamed Eid

    (Heliopolis University For Sustainable Development)

  • Niveen Badra

    (Ain Shams University)

Abstract

This research studies prediction models for optical water properties, which are very important to save time consumption to easy control of irrigation systems to make it smart irrigation systems and changing manual system with automatic systems, moreover the suitable time to implement maintenance. One of the most important reasons to use a regression model in this study is to have the ability to use a simple laser device to measure one optical parameter or physical parameters to predict the other parameters by regression models, which will save more money used by an expensive laser device to measure the three optical properties (reflection, transmission, and absorption). Data collected through laboratory experiments were then put through various machine learning regression models. The applied models are random forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), support vector machine (SVR), and multiple linear regression (MLR). Four scenarios implemented these models; the first scenario included [pressure difference (Bar), wavelength (nm), total suspended solids (TSS)] for samples of Water taken from the filtration system, the second scenario included (Bar, nm, TSS, and reflection), the third scenario included (Bar, nm, TSS and transmission). The fourth scenario is (Bar, nm, TSS, transmission, and reflection). The findings of this research were SVR in scenario 3 (SVR3) had a high correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.95) and minimum error, followed by MLR in scenario 3 (MLR3) and scenario 2 (MLR2), which had the same correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.95), but errors were higher than SVR3. The lowest root means square error (RMSE) was in SVR in scenario 1 (SVR1) by 0.180, followed by RF in scenario 1 (RF1) by 0.181, and the highest was in RF in scenario 2 (RF 2) by 15.2. Based on these performance criteria, SVR3 is the best model to predict optical properties in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Wessam El-Ssawy & Hosam Elhegazy & Heba Abd-Elrahman & Mohamed Eid & Niveen Badra, 2023. "Identification of the best model to predict optical properties of water," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6781-6797, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:7:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02331-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02331-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02331-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02331-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ping Liu & Jin Wang & Arun Kumar Sangaiah & Yang Xie & Xinchun Yin, 2019. "Analysis and Prediction of Water Quality Using LSTM Deep Neural Networks in IoT Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allison Lassiter & Nicole Leonard, 2022. "A systematic review of municipal smart water for climate adaptation and mitigation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(5), pages 1406-1430, June.
    2. Francis Rathinam & Sayak Khatua & Zeba Siddiqui & Manya Malik & Pallavi Duggal & Samantha Watson & Xavier Vollenweider, 2021. "Using big data for evaluating development outcomes: A systematic map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
    3. Eric Hitimana & Gaurav Bajpai & Richard Musabe & Louis Sibomana & Jayavel Kayalvizhi, 2021. "Implementation of IoT Framework with Data Analysis Using Deep Learning Methods for Occupancy Prediction in a Building," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Kagiso Samuel More & Christian Wolkersdorfer, 2022. "Predicting and Forecasting Mine Water Parameters Using a Hybrid Intelligent System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(8), pages 2813-2826, June.
    5. Heelak Choi & Sang-Ik Suh & Su-Hee Kim & Eun Jin Han & Seo Jin Ki, 2021. "Assessing the Performance of Deep Learning Algorithms for Short-Term Surface Water Quality Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-11, September.
    6. Xiaonan Ji & Jianghai Chen & Yali Guo, 2022. "A Multi-Dimensional Investigation on Water Quality of Urban Rivers with Emphasis on Implications for the Optimization of Monitoring Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Docheshmeh Gorgij, A. & Askari, Gh & Taghipour, A.A. & Jami, M. & Mirfardi, M., 2023. "Spatiotemporal Forecasting of the Groundwater Quality for Irrigation Purposes, Using Deep Learning Method: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    8. Nadine Bachmann & Shailesh Tripathi & Manuel Brunner & Herbert Jodlbauer, 2022. "The Contribution of Data-Driven Technologies in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-33, February.
    9. Song, Chenyu & Zhang, Haiping, 2020. "Study on turbidity prediction method of reservoirs based on long short term memory neural network," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 432(C).
    10. El Bilali, Ali & Taleb, Abdeslam & Brouziyne, Youssef, 2021. "Groundwater quality forecasting using machine learning algorithms for irrigation purposes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    11. Mosleh Hmoud Al-Adhaileh & Fawaz Waselallah Alsaade, 2021. "Modelling and Prediction of Water Quality by Using Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:7:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02331-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.