IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v23y2021i12d10.1007_s10668-021-01410-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the impacts of fishing regulations in a tropical Indian estuary using Ecopath with Ecosim approach

Author

Listed:
  • G. B. Sreekanth

    (ICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute)

  • S. K. Chakraborty

    (ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education)

  • A. K. Jaiswar

    (ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education)

  • P. U. Zacharia

    (ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute)

  • K. S. Mohamed

    (ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute)

Abstract

In this study, we measured the impacts of an effective fishing regulation on the sustainability of fisheries in Zuari estuary, a tropical estuary situated along western coast of India through an Ecosim approach. Ecosystem indicators for 2016 and 2031 (for each Ecosim scenario) were measured to compare and contrast the decadal changes in the status of the ecosystem between these two periods. Four different hypothetical fishing patterns were simulated to explore the best suited management scenario. The ecosystem indices of 2031 ecosystem were compared with that obtained for 2016 to evaluate the possible effects of fishing regulations. The functional groups showed a decline in their biomass when no fishing regulations are implemented (S1). The direct fishing effort reductions of all the fleets (S4) and ban/reduction of indiscriminate fishing fleets (S2-immediate ban and S3-gradual reduction) showed a more or less similar trend for recovery of fish stocks through diverse fisheries policies. A complete ban of indiscriminate fishing seems to slightly more advantageous than the direct reductions in the fishing effort for all the fleets in terms of stock recovery (130%), Q statistic (1.15), Shannon diversity (1.43), mean trophic level of ecosystem (2.98), mean trophic level of the catch (2.91) and fish catch in the gillnet fleet (200%). The simulations have also suggested that a complete control for mechanized fishing fleets will be the best possible management strategy for the recovery of fish stocks in the ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • G. B. Sreekanth & S. K. Chakraborty & A. K. Jaiswar & P. U. Zacharia & K. S. Mohamed, 2021. "Modeling the impacts of fishing regulations in a tropical Indian estuary using Ecopath with Ecosim approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17745-17763, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01410-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01410-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01410-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01410-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schrank, William E., 2005. "The Newfoundland fishery: ten years after the moratorium," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 407-420, September.
    2. Heymans, Johanna Jacomina & Coll, Marta & Link, Jason S. & Mackinson, Steven & Steenbeek, Jeroen & Walters, Carl & Christensen, Villy, 2016. "Best practice in Ecopath with Ecosim food-web models for ecosystem-based management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 331(C), pages 173-184.
    3. Wang, Ying & Duan, Lijie & Li, Shiyu & Zeng, Zeyu & Failler, Pierre, 2015. "Modeling the effect of the seasonal fishing moratorium on the Pearl River Estuary using ecosystem simulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 406-416.
    4. Wang, Y. & Li, S.Y. & Duan, L.J. & Liu, Y., 2012. "Fishery policy exploration in the Pearl River Estuary based on an Ecosim model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 34-43.
    5. Araújo, Júlio N. & Mackinson, Steve & Stanford, Richard J. & Hart, Paul J.B., 2008. "Exploring fisheries strategies for the western English Channel using an ecosystem model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(4), pages 465-477.
    6. Tsehaye, Iyob & Nagelkerke, Leopold A.J., 2008. "Exploring optimal fishing scenarios for the multispecies artisanal fisheries of Eritrea using a trophic model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 319-333.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Ying & Duan, Lijie & Li, Shiyu & Zeng, Zeyu & Failler, Pierre, 2015. "Modeling the effect of the seasonal fishing moratorium on the Pearl River Estuary using ecosystem simulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 406-416.
    2. Ricci, P. & Serpetti, N. & Cascione, D. & Cipriano, G. & D'Onghia, G. & De Padova, D. & Fanizza, C. & Ingrosso, M. & Carlucci, R., 2023. "Investigating fishery and climate change effects on the conservation status of odontocetes in the Northern Ionian Sea (Central Mediterranean Sea)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 485(C).
    3. Deehr, Rebecca A. & Luczkovich, Joseph J. & Hart, Kevin J. & Clough, Lisa M. & Johnson, Beverly J. & Johnson, Jeffrey C., 2014. "Using stable isotope analysis to validate effective trophic levels from Ecopath models of areas closed and open to shrimp trawling in Core Sound, NC, USA," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 282(C), pages 1-17.
    4. Woodstock, Matthew S. & Sutton, Tracey T. & Frank, Tamara & Zhang, Yuying, 2021. "An early warning sign: trophic structure changes in the oceanic Gulf of Mexico from 2011—2018," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 445(C).
    5. Booth, Shawn & Walters, William J & Steenbeek, Jeroen & Christensen, Villy & Charmasson, Sabine, 2020. "An Ecopath with Ecosim model for the Pacific coast of eastern Japan: Describing the marine environment and its fisheries prior to the Great East Japan earthquake," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).
    6. Kahmann, Birte & Stumpf, Klara Helene & Baumgärtner, Stefan, 2015. "Notions of justice held by stakeholders of the Newfoundland fishery," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 37-50.
    7. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    8. Wang, Y. & Li, S.Y. & Duan, L.J. & Liu, Y., 2012. "Fishery policy exploration in the Pearl River Estuary based on an Ecosim model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 34-43.
    9. Tesfaye, Gashaw & Wolff, Matthias, 2018. "Modeling trophic interactions and the impact of an introduced exotic carp species in the Rift Valley Lake Koka, Ethiopia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 378(C), pages 26-36.
    10. Sean Pascoe & Tomas A. Okey & Shane Griffiths, 2008. "Economic and ecosystem impacts of illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) fishing in Northern Australia ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 52(4), pages 433-452, December.
    11. Crépin, Anne-Sophie & Biggs, Reinette & Polasky, Stephen & Troell, Max & de Zeeuw, Aart, 2012. "Regime shifts and management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 15-22.
    12. Bueno-Pardo, Juan & García-Seoane, Eva & Sousa, Ana I. & Coelho, João P. & Morgado, Mariana & Frankenbach, Silja & Ezequiel, João & Vaz, Nuno & Quintino, Victor & Rodrigues, Ana M. & Leandro, Sérgio &, 2018. "Trophic web structure and ecosystem attributes of a temperate coastal lagoon (Ria de Aveiro, Portugal)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 378(C), pages 13-25.
    13. Coll, Marta & Steenbeek, Jeroen & Sole, Jordi & Palomera, Isabel & Christensen, Villy, 2016. "Modelling the cumulative spatial–temporal effects of environmental drivers and fishing in a NW Mediterranean marine ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 331(C), pages 100-114.
    14. Bentley, Jacob W. & Serpetti, Natalia & Heymans, Johanna Jacomina, 2017. "Investigating the potential impacts of ocean warming on the Norwegian and Barents Seas ecosystem using a time-dynamic food-web model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 94-107.
    15. Gray DiLeone, A.M. & Ainsworth, C.H., 2019. "Effects of Karenia brevis harmful algal blooms on fish community structure on the West Florida Shelf," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 250-267.
    16. Antony, P.J. & Dhanya, S. & Lyla, P.S. & Kurup, B.M. & Ajmal Khan, S., 2010. "Ecological role of stomatopods (mantis shrimps) and potential impacts of trawling in a marine ecosystem of the southeast coast of India," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(21), pages 2604-2614.
    17. McGill, Lillian M. & Gerig, Brandon S. & Chaloner, Dominic T. & Lamberti, Gary A., 2017. "An ecosystem model for evaluating the effects of introduced Pacific salmon on contaminant burdens of stream-resident fish," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 355(C), pages 39-48.
    18. Lercari, Diego & Defeo, Omar & Ortega, Leonardo & Orlando, Luis & Gianelli, Ignacio & Celentano, Eleonora, 2018. "Long-term structural and functional changes driven by climate variability and fishery regimes in a sandy beach ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 41-51.
    19. Haller-Bull, Vanessa & Rovenskaya, Elena, 2019. "Optimizing functional groups in ecosystem models: Case study of the Great Barrier Reef," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).
    20. Christensen, Villy & Ferdaña, Zach & Steenbeek, Jeroen, 2009. "Spatial optimization of protected area placement incorporating ecological, social and economical criteria," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2583-2593.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01410-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.