IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v282y2014icp1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using stable isotope analysis to validate effective trophic levels from Ecopath models of areas closed and open to shrimp trawling in Core Sound, NC, USA

Author

Listed:
  • Deehr, Rebecca A.
  • Luczkovich, Joseph J.
  • Hart, Kevin J.
  • Clough, Lisa M.
  • Johnson, Beverly J.
  • Johnson, Jeffrey C.

Abstract

We used stable isotope ratios of nitrogen (15N/14N) as a validation tool for determining the accuracy of the effective trophic levels computed in network analysis models for Core Sound, North Carolina, USA. Ecological network models (using Ecopath) were assembled for two trawling management areas, closed areas where shrimp trawling has been restricted for 30 years, and open trawling areas within the estuary. Effective trophic levels (ETLs) were computed from the two Ecopath models and compared with δ15N values measured from the same species at the same time in the two areas. Comparisons of ETLs between species compartments of the two models were very similar, and ETLs were positively related to δ15N values. Linear regression of ETL as a predictor of δ15N value was highly significant (R2=0.50, p>0.00001), suggesting that δ15N values increase by 2.52‰ per trophic level. This increase in δ15N value agrees well with a recent global meta-analysis of nitrogen fractionation estimates. There was no significant difference in δ15N values between trawling zones over all species examined, although there were significantly higher δ15N values in the areas open to trawling for certain species of fish (pinfish, spot) and invertebrate (blue crabs). Atlantic menhaden, which feed on detritus and zooplankton, had much higher δ15N values than the Ecopath ETL and δ15N regression model predicted (large studentized residuals), suggesting that Ecopath incorrectly computes the trophic level of animals that consume dead material (in our model, detritus and shrimp trawl bycatch species). Shrimp trawl bycatch species are mostly pinfish, spot and blue crabs, with ETLs of 2.5 or higher, but are inappropriately assumed to be at trophic level 1 when dead in Ecopath. Despite this discrepancy for some species of detritivores and scavengers, we conclude that this Ecopath network model of Core Sound is reliable and predicts with good accuracy the shifts and changes in trophic level and diet as measured by stable isotopes and observed in diet studies. The Core Sound network model will be a useful approach when predicting impacts in the ecosystem due to changes in trawling or other fisheries management decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Deehr, Rebecca A. & Luczkovich, Joseph J. & Hart, Kevin J. & Clough, Lisa M. & Johnson, Beverly J. & Johnson, Jeffrey C., 2014. "Using stable isotope analysis to validate effective trophic levels from Ecopath models of areas closed and open to shrimp trawling in Core Sound, NC, USA," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 282(C), pages 1-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:282:y:2014:i:c:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.03.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438001400129X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.03.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cisneros-Montemayor, Andrés M. & Christensen, Villy & Arreguín-Sánchez, Francisco & Sumaila, U. Rashid, 2012. "Ecosystem models for management advice: An analysis of recreational and commercial fisheries policies in Baja California Sur, Mexico," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 8-16.
    2. Wang, Y. & Li, S.Y. & Duan, L.J. & Liu, Y., 2012. "Fishery policy exploration in the Pearl River Estuary based on an Ecosim model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 34-43.
    3. Arreguin-Sanchez, Francisco & Zetina-Rejón, Manuel & Ramírez-Rodríguez, Mauricio, 2008. "Exploring ecosystem-based harvesting strategies to recover the collapsed pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus duorarum) fishery in the southern Gulf of Mexico," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 83-94.
    4. Milessi, Andrés C. & Danilo, Calliari & Laura, Rodríguez-Graña & Daniel, Conde & Javier, Sellanes & Rodríguez-Gallego, Lorena, 2010. "Trophic mass-balance model of a subtropical coastal lagoon, including a comparison with a stable isotope analysis of the food-web," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(24), pages 2859-2869.
    5. Dame, James K. & Christian, Robert R., 2008. "Evaluation of ecological network analysis: Validation of output," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 327-338.
    6. Tsehaye, Iyob & Nagelkerke, Leopold A.J., 2008. "Exploring optimal fishing scenarios for the multispecies artisanal fisheries of Eritrea using a trophic model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 319-333.
    7. Díaz López, Bruno & Bunke, Mandy & Bernal Shirai, Julia Andrea, 2008. "Marine aquaculture off Sardinia Island (Italy): Ecosystem effects evaluated through a trophic mass-balance model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 292-303.
    8. Polovina, J.J., 1984. "An overview of the ecopath model," Fishbyte, The WorldFish Center, vol. 2(2), pages 5-7.
    9. Christian, Robert R. & Brinson, Mark M. & Dame, James K. & Johnson, Galen & Peterson, Charles H. & Baird, Daniel, 2009. "Ecological network analyses and their use for establishing reference domain in functional assessment of an estuary," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3113-3122.
    10. Colléter, Mathieu & Gascuel, Didier & Ecoutin, Jean-Marc & Tito de Morais, Luis, 2012. "Modelling trophic flows in ecosystems to assess the efficiency of marine protected area (MPA), a case study on the coast of Sénégal," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Du, Jianguo & Cheung, William W.L. & Zheng, Xinqing & Chen, Bin & Liao, Jianji & Hu, Wenjia, 2015. "Comparing trophic structure of a subtropical bay as estimated from mass-balance food web model and stable isotope analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 175-181.
    2. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    3. Heymans, Johanna Jacomina & Coll, Marta & Link, Jason S. & Mackinson, Steven & Steenbeek, Jeroen & Walters, Carl & Christensen, Villy, 2016. "Best practice in Ecopath with Ecosim food-web models for ecosystem-based management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 331(C), pages 173-184.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Ying & Duan, Lijie & Li, Shiyu & Zeng, Zeyu & Failler, Pierre, 2015. "Modeling the effect of the seasonal fishing moratorium on the Pearl River Estuary using ecosystem simulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 406-416.
    2. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    3. Borrett, S.R. & Freeze, M.A. & Salas, A.K., 2011. "Equivalence of the realized input and output oriented indirect effects metrics in Ecological Network Analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(13), pages 2142-2148.
    4. G. B. Sreekanth & S. K. Chakraborty & A. K. Jaiswar & P. U. Zacharia & K. S. Mohamed, 2021. "Modeling the impacts of fishing regulations in a tropical Indian estuary using Ecopath with Ecosim approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17745-17763, December.
    5. Zhang, Yan & Zheng, Hongmei & Fath, Brian D., 2015. "Ecological network analysis of an industrial symbiosis system: A case study of the Shandong Lubei eco-industrial park," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 174-184.
    6. Zhang, Yan & Lu, Hanjing & Fath, Brian D. & Zheng, Hongmei, 2016. "Modelling urban nitrogen metabolic processes based on ecological network analysis: A case of study in Beijing, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 29-38.
    7. Johnson, Galen A. & Niquil, Nathalie & Asmus, Harald & Bacher, Cédric & Asmus, Ragnhild & Baird, Daniel, 2009. "The effects of aggregation on the performance of the inverse method and indicators of network analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3448-3464.
    8. Du, Jianguo & Cheung, William W.L. & Zheng, Xinqing & Chen, Bin & Liao, Jianji & Hu, Wenjia, 2015. "Comparing trophic structure of a subtropical bay as estimated from mass-balance food web model and stable isotope analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 175-181.
    9. Milessi, Andrés C. & Danilo, Calliari & Laura, Rodríguez-Graña & Daniel, Conde & Javier, Sellanes & Rodríguez-Gallego, Lorena, 2010. "Trophic mass-balance model of a subtropical coastal lagoon, including a comparison with a stable isotope analysis of the food-web," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(24), pages 2859-2869.
    10. Woodstock, Matthew S. & Sutton, Tracey T. & Frank, Tamara & Zhang, Yuying, 2021. "An early warning sign: trophic structure changes in the oceanic Gulf of Mexico from 2011—2018," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 445(C).
    11. Dai, Jing & Fath, Brian & Chen, Bin, 2012. "Constructing a network of the social-economic consumption system of China using extended exergy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4796-4808.
    12. Wang, Y. & Li, S.Y. & Duan, L.J. & Liu, Y., 2012. "Fishery policy exploration in the Pearl River Estuary based on an Ecosim model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 34-43.
    13. Chen, Shaoqing & Chen, Bin & Fath, Brian D., 2015. "Assessing the cumulative environmental impact of hydropower construction on river systems based on energy network model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 78-92.
    14. Gao, Yan & Liu, Gengyuan & Casazza, Marco & Hao, Yan & Zhang, Yan & Giannetti, Biagio F., 2018. "Economy-pollution nexus model of cities at river basin scale based on multi-agent simulation: A conceptual framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 379(C), pages 22-38.
    15. Tianlin Zhai & Jing Wang & Ying Fang & Jingjing Liu & Longyang Huang & Kun Chen & Chenchen Zhao, 2021. "Identification and Prediction of Wetland Ecological Risk in Key Cities of the Yangtze River Economic Belt: From the Perspective of Land Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Steenbeek, Jeroen & Coll, Marta & Gurney, Leigh & Mélin, Frédéric & Hoepffner, Nicolas & Buszowski, Joe & Christensen, Villy, 2013. "Bridging the gap between ecosystem modeling tools and geographic information systems: Driving a food web model with external spatial–temporal data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 139-151.
    17. Berrios, Fernando & Campbell, Daniel E. & Ortiz, Marco, 2017. "Emergy evaluation of benthic ecosystems influenced by upwelling in northern Chile: Contributions of the ecosystems to the regional economy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 146-164.
    18. Nuttall, M.A. & Jordaan, A. & Cerrato, R.M. & Frisk, M.G., 2011. "Identifying 120 years of decline in ecosystem structure and maturity of Great South Bay, New York using the Ecopath modelling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(18), pages 3335-3345.
    19. Zhu, Xueting & Mu, Xianzhong & Hu, Guangwen, 2019. "Ecological network analysis of urban energy metabolic system—A case study of Beijing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 404(C), pages 36-45.
    20. Antony, P.J. & Dhanya, S. & Lyla, P.S. & Kurup, B.M. & Ajmal Khan, S., 2010. "Ecological role of stomatopods (mantis shrimps) and potential impacts of trawling in a marine ecosystem of the southeast coast of India," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(21), pages 2604-2614.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:282:y:2014:i:c:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.