IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v33y2023i1d10.1007_s12525-023-00654-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detecting anomalous cryptocurrency transactions: An AML/CFT application of machine learning-based forensics

Author

Listed:
  • Nadia Pocher

    (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)

  • Mirko Zichichi

    (University of Bologna)

  • Fabio Merizzi

    (University of Bologna)

  • Muhammad Zohaib Shafiq

    (University of Bologna)

  • Stefano Ferretti

    (University of Urbino)

Abstract

In shaping the Internet of Money, the application of blockchain and distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) to the financial sector triggered regulatory concerns. Notably, while the user anonymity enabled in this field may safeguard privacy and data protection, the lack of identifiability hinders accountability and challenges the fight against money laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation (AML/CFT). As law enforcement agencies and the private sector apply forensics to track crypto transfers across ecosystems that are socio-technical in nature, this paper focuses on the growing relevance of these techniques in a domain where their deployment impacts the traits and evolution of the sphere. In particular, this work offers contextualized insights into the application of methods of machine learning and transaction graph analysis. Namely, it analyzes a real-world dataset of Bitcoin transactions represented as a directed graph network through various techniques. The modeling of blockchain transactions as a complex network suggests that the use of graph-based data analysis methods can help classify transactions and identify illicit ones. Indeed, this work shows that the neural network types known as Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN) and Graph Attention Networks (GAT) are a promising AML/CFT solution. Notably, in this scenario GCN outperform other classic approaches and GAT are applied for the first time to detect anomalies in Bitcoin. Ultimately, the paper upholds the value of public–private synergies to devise forensic strategies conscious of the spirit of explainability and data openness.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadia Pocher & Mirko Zichichi & Fabio Merizzi & Muhammad Zohaib Shafiq & Stefano Ferretti, 2023. "Detecting anomalous cryptocurrency transactions: An AML/CFT application of machine learning-based forensics," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:33:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-023-00654-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-023-00654-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-023-00654-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-023-00654-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Micha Ober & Stefan Katzenbeisser & Kay Hamacher, 2013. "Structure and Anonymity of the Bitcoin Transaction Graph," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Ali, Omar & Ally, Mustafa & Clutterbuck, & Dwivedi, Yogesh, 2020. "The state of play of blockchain technology in the financial services sector: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    3. Barbereau, Tom & Smethurst, Reilly & Papageorgiou, Orestis & Sedlmeir, Johannes & Fridgen, Gilbert, 2023. "Decentralised Finance’s timocratic governance: The distribution and exercise of tokenised voting rights," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Matthias Lischke & Benjamin Fabian, 2016. "Analyzing the Bitcoin Network: The First Four Years," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-40, March.
    5. Tamás Katona, 2021. "Decentralized Finance - The Possibilities of a Blockchain "Money Lego" System," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 20(1), pages 74-102.
    6. Jennifer J. Xu, 2016. "Are blockchains immune to all malicious attacks?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-9, December.
    7. Sirio Aramonteand & Wenqian Huang & Andreas Schrimpf, 2021. "DeFi risks and the decentralisation illusion," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junliang Luo & Stefan Kitzler & Pietro Saggese, 2024. "Investigating Similarities Across Decentralized Financial (DeFi) Services," Papers 2404.00034, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Javier García-Corral & José Antonio Cordero-García & Jaime de Pablo-Valenciano & Juan Uribe-Toril, 2022. "A bibliometric review of cryptocurrencies: how have they grown?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-31, December.
    2. Valentina Gatteschi & Fabrizio Lamberti & Claudio Demartini & Chiara Pranteda & Víctor Santamaría, 2018. "Blockchain and Smart Contracts for Insurance: Is the Technology Mature Enough?," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Şoiman, Florentina & Dumas, Jean-Guillaume & Jimenez-Garces, Sonia, 2023. "What drives DeFi market returns?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Pietro Saggese & Esther Segalla & Michael Sigmund & Burkhard Raunig & Felix Zangerl & Bernhard Haslhofer, 2023. "Assessing the Solvency of Virtual Asset Service Providers: Are Current Standards Sufficient?," Papers 2309.16408, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    5. Chen, R. & Chen, K. & Ou, Carol, 2023. "Facilitating interorganizational trust in strategic alliances by leveraging blockchain-based systems: Case studies of two eastern banks," Other publications TiSEM 85ecf99c-76f0-416e-9604-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Florentina c{S}oiman & Guillaume Dumas & Sonia Jimenez-Garces, 2022. "The return of (I)DeFiX," Papers 2204.00251, arXiv.org.
    7. George Vlahavas & Kostas Karasavvas & Athena Vakali, 2024. "Unsupervised clustering of bitcoin transactions," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-31, December.
    8. Bernhard Haslhofer & Burkhard Raunig & Pietro Saggase & Esther Segalla & Michael Sigmund & Felix Zangerl, 2023. "Assessing the Solvency of Virtual Asset Service Providers: Are Current Standards Sufficient? (Pietro Saggese, Esther Segalla, Michael Sigmund, Burkhard Raunig, Felix Zangerl, Bernhard Haslhofer)," Working Papers 248, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank).
    9. Florentina Șoiman & Jean-Guillaume Dumas & Sonia Jimenez-Garces, 2022. "The return of (I)DeFiX [Le rendement de (I)DeFiX]," Working Papers hal-03625891, HAL.
    10. Karau, Sören, 2021. "Monetary policy and Bitcoin," Discussion Papers 41/2021, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    11. Abate, Giorgio & Branzoli, Nicola & Gallo, Raffaele, 2023. "Crypto-Asset Markets: Structure, Market Developments in 2022 and Policy Considerations," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 76(3), pages 353-386.
    12. Toorajipour, Reza & Oghazi, Pejvak & Sohrabpour, Vahid & Patel, Pankaj C. & Mostaghel, Rana, 2022. "Block by block: A blockchain-based peer-to-peer business transaction for international trade," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Wang Guizhou & Zhang Si & Yu Tao & Ning Yu, 2021. "A Systematic Overview of Blockchain Research," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 205-238, June.
    14. Huru Hasanova & Ui‐jun Baek & Mu‐gon Shin & Kyunghee Cho & Myung‐Sup Kim, 2019. "A survey on blockchain cybersecurity vulnerabilities and possible countermeasures," International Journal of Network Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), March.
    15. Carlo Campajola & Marco D'Errico & Claudio J. Tessone, 2022. "MicroVelocity: rethinking the Velocity of Money for digital currencies," Papers 2201.13416, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    16. Tanković Ana Čuić & Prodan Marina Perišić & Benazić Dragan, 2023. "Consumer Segments in Blockchain Technology Adoption," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 18(2), pages 162-172, December.
    17. Khaled A. M. Ahmed & Sabry F. Saraya & John F. Wanis & Amr M. T. Ali-Eldin, 2023. "A Blockchain Self-Sovereign Identity for Open Banking Secured by the Customer’s Banking Cards," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, June.
    18. Raphael Auer & Bernhard Haslhofer & Stefan Kitzler & Pietro Saggese & Friedhelm Victor, 2023. "The Technology of Decentralized Finance (DeFi)," BIS Working Papers 1066, Bank for International Settlements.
    19. Saengchote, Kanis, 2023. "Decentralized lending and its users: Insights from compound," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    20. Luis Gutiérrez de Rozas, 2022. "The first ten years of the European Systemic Risk Board (2011-2021)," Financial Stability Review, Banco de España, issue Spring.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Blockchain technology; Financial technology; Network forensics; Graph analysis; AML/CFT;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:33:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-023-00654-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.