IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/decfin/v46y2023i2d10.1007_s10203-023-00404-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green economy with efficient public incentives

Author

Listed:
  • Marcello Galeotti

    (University of Florence)

  • Emanuele Vannucci

    (University of Pisa)

Abstract

There is a widespread interest among institutions and economic agents for a reduction of the environmental impact of the production system. An important role seems to be played by the ability of public institutions to push the transition toward a green economy also through the application of fiscal policies that envisage a system of rewards and penalties, respectively, for those companies which adopt green strategies and those which do not. It is clear that readjusting older production systems to new pollution regulations can lead in the short term to profitability reductions for the companies implementing them, even though it is possible to assume increases in profitability over medium-long time horizons. One possible approach to this issue is the classical econometric one, which analyzes the effect of different parameters of multivariate models, that influence the level of pollution due to production systems with different propensity for environmental protection. Optimal control models have been also considered with control variables relating to the technologies of production systems and public incentive policies for the green economy: see for example (Tan et al. in J Syst Sci Inf 9(1):61–73, 2021). In recent years, many scholars have studied the relationship between environmental regulation and enterprise technological innovation using evolutionary games, involving mainly economic incentives and fiscal strategies (see see Suyong et al. in Appl Math Comput 355(15):343–355, 2019; Zhang and Li in Appl Math Model 63:577–590, 2018). In our article, we propose a dynamical model where the public administration uses pollution penalties as a control variable in order to push a production sector toward better performances concerning two targets, pollution level and profitability. To this end, we consider the effects of competitiveness among firms and technology innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcello Galeotti & Emanuele Vannucci, 2023. "Green economy with efficient public incentives," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 46(2), pages 667-680, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:decfin:v:46:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10203-023-00404-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10203-023-00404-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10203-023-00404-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10203-023-00404-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antoci, Angelo & Galeotti, Marcello & Russu, Paolo, 2011. "Poverty trap and global indeterminacy in a growth model with open-access natural resources," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 569-591, March.
    2. O. V. Kozhevina, 2015. "Sustainable Development And Green Growth In The Agro-Industrial Regions," Business Strategies, Real Economy Publishing House, issue 3.
    3. Zsolt Darvas & Guntram B. Wolff, 2021. "A green fiscal pact- climate investment in times of budget consolidation," Bruegel Policy Contributions 44540, Bruegel.
    4. Benjamin Hübel & Hendrik Scholz, 2020. "Integrating sustainability risks in asset management: the role of ESG exposures and ESG ratings," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 52-69, February.
    5. Tiziana Ciano & Massimiliano Ferrara & Mariangela Gangemi & Domenica Stefania Merenda & Bruno Antonio Pansera, 2021. "Climate Change Sustainability: From Bargaining to Cooperative Balanced Approach," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Markus Hang & Jerome Geyer‐Klingeberg & Andreas W. Rathgeber, 2019. "It is merely a matter of time: A meta‐analysis of the causality between environmental performance and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 257-273, February.
    7. Małgorzata Gawrycka & Anna Szymczak, 2021. "A Panel Analysis of the Impact of Green Transformation and Globalization on the Labor Share in the National Income," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luca Grosset & Elena Sartori, 2025. "Mean-Field Modeling of Green Technology Adoption: A Competition for Incentives," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angelo Antoci & Marcello Galeotti & Paolo Russu, 2014. "Global analysis and indeterminacy in a two-sector growth model with human capital," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 10(4), pages 313-338, December.
    2. Matilda Baret & Maxime Menuet, 2024. "Fiscal and Environmental Sustainability: Is Public Debt Environmentally Friendly?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(6), pages 1497-1520, June.
    3. Manjira Datta & Kevin Reffett & Łukasz Woźny, 2018. "Comparing recursive equilibrium in economies with dynamic complementarities and indeterminacy," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 66(3), pages 593-626, October.
    4. Costanza Torricelli & Beatrice Bertelli, 2022. "ESG screening strategies and portfolio performance: how do they fare in periods of financial distress?," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 0087, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    5. Bai Xue & Zhuang Zhang & Pingli Li, 2020. "Corporate environmental performance, environmental management and firm risk," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1074-1096, March.
    6. Mario Alloza & Danilo Leiva-León & Alberto Urtasun, 2022. "The response of private investment to an increase in public investment," Economic Bulletin, Banco de España, issue 2/2022.
    7. Muck, Matthias & Schmidl, Thomas, 2024. "Comparing ESG score weighting approaches and stock performance differentiation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    8. Changping Zhao & Maliyamu Sadula & Xiangmeng Huang & Yali Yang & Yu Gong & Shuai Yang, 2022. "The Game Model of Blue Carbon Collaboration along MSR—From the Regret Theory Perspective," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Tingli Liu & Yu Fang & Qianqian Shi & Lei Ren, 2023. "Research on the Effect of the New Environmental Protection Law on the Market Competitiveness of China’s Heavily Polluting Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Yasuhiro Nakamoto & Koichi Futagami, 2016. "Dynamic Analysis of a Renewable Resource in a Small Open Economy: The Role of Environmental Policies for the Environment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 64(3), pages 373-399, July.
    11. Lu, Chia-Wu & Wu, Hsueh-Ling & Su, Yu-Hsuan, 2024. "The icing on the cake: ESG effect on the quality factor portfolios," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Dingzu Zhang & Luqi Liu, 2022. "Does ESG Performance Enhance Financial Flexibility? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Alexander Golub & Michael Toman, 2016. "Climate Change, Industrial Transformation, and “Environmental Growth Traps”," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(2), pages 249-263, February.
    14. Liyuan Meng & Yuchen Zhang, 2023. "Impact of Tax Administration on ESG Performance—A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on China’s Golden Tax Project III," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    15. Abhishek Dutta & Debarati Ghosh & Meghna Dutta, 2024. "Can borrowing constraints enhance environmental sustainability? An alternative parametric approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2683-2693, May.
    16. Gönül Çifçi & Adem Ruhan Sönmez, 2023. "Is sustainability important for returns?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(12), pages 15119-15137, December.
    17. Claudio Nuber & Patrick Velte & Jacob Hörisch, 2020. "The curvilinear and time‐lagging impact of sustainability performance on financial performance: Evidence from Germany," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 232-243, January.
    18. Kang, Songhee & Hong, Ahreum, 2025. "Navigating ESG challenges in ICT: Risks and rewards across the pandemic landscape," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Yifan Xie & Yingkai Fang & Dengjun Zhang, 2022. "How Environmental Performance Affects Financial Performance in the Food Industry: A Global Outlook," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, Emawtee & Brooks, Robert & Do, Hung Xuan, 2023. "ESG and firm performance: The role of size and media channels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:decfin:v:46:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10203-023-00404-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.