IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v36y2021i1d10.1007_s00180-020-01021-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inference and optimal censoring scheme for progressively Type-II censored competing risks model for generalized Rayleigh distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Junru Ren

    (Beijing Jiaotong University)

  • Wenhao Gui

    (Beijing Jiaotong University)

Abstract

This paper considers the statistical inference for the competing risks model from generalized Rayleigh distribution based on progressive Type-II censoring when the parameters of the latent lifetime distributions are different or common. Maximum likelihood estimates are obtained, where the existence of the point estimators are proved, and the confidence intervals are established via the observed Fisher information matrix as well. Bayesian estimates of unknown parameters and reliability characteristics are derived under symmetric and asymmetric loss functions, and Monte Carlo Markov Chain sampling method is used to compute the Bayesian point estimates and the highest posterior density credible intervals. In addition, Bootstrap methods are also considered to obtain bias-corrected point estimates and approximate confidence intervals. Then we carry out hypothesis test using likelihood ratio test statistics. Monte Carlo simulation and a set of real data are presented to assess the performance of our proposed methods. Finally, the optimal censoring scheme issue is studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Junru Ren & Wenhao Gui, 2021. "Inference and optimal censoring scheme for progressively Type-II censored competing risks model for generalized Rayleigh distribution," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 479-513, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:36:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s00180-020-01021-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-020-01021-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-020-01021-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-020-01021-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Indrani Basak & N. Balakrishnan, 2017. "Prediction of censored exponential lifetimes in a simple step-stress model under progressive Type II censoring," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1665-1687, December.
    2. Meintanis, Simos G., 2008. "A new approach of goodness-of-fit testing for exponentiated laws applied to the generalized Rayleigh distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2496-2503, January.
    3. Yao Zhang & William Q. Meeker, 2005. "Bayesian life test planning for the Weibull distribution with given shape parameter," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 237-249, June.
    4. Cramer, Erhard & Schmiedt, Anja Bettina, 2011. "Progressively Type-II censored competing risks data from Lomax distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 1285-1303, March.
    5. H. Krishna & N. Goel, 2018. "Classical and Bayesian inference in two parameter exponential distribution with randomly censored data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 249-275, March.
    6. Pareek, Bhuvanesh & Kundu, Debasis & Kumar, Sumit, 2009. "On progressively censored competing risks data for Weibull distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4083-4094, October.
    7. Manoj Chacko & Rakhi Mohan, 2019. "Bayesian analysis of Weibull distribution based on progressive type-II censored competing risks data with binomial removals," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 233-252, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pao-sheng Shen, 2022. "Nonparametric estimation for competing risks survival data subject to left truncation and interval censoring," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 29-42, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muqrin A. Almuqrin & Mukhtar M. Salah & Essam A. Ahmed, 2022. "Statistical Inference for Competing Risks Model with Adaptive Progressively Type-II Censored Gompertz Life Data Using Industrial and Medical Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-38, November.
    2. Manoj Chacko & Rakhi Mohan, 2019. "Bayesian analysis of Weibull distribution based on progressive type-II censored competing risks data with binomial removals," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 233-252, March.
    3. Rui Hua & Wenhao Gui, 2022. "Revisit to progressively Type-II censored competing risks data from Lomax distributions," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(3), pages 377-394, June.
    4. Jiaxin Nie & Wenhao Gui, 2019. "Parameter Estimation of Lindley Distribution Based on Progressive Type-II Censored Competing Risks Data with Binomial Removals," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-15, July.
    5. U. H. Salemi & S. Rezaei & Y. Si & S. Nadarajah, 2018. "On Optimal Progressive Censoring Schemes for Normal Distribution," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 637-658, December.
    6. Mazen Nassar & Refah Alotaibi & Chunfang Zhang, 2022. "Estimation of Reliability Indices for Alpha Power Exponential Distribution Based on Progressively Censored Competing Risks Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-25, June.
    7. Subhankar Dutta & Suchandan Kayal, 2023. "Inference of a competing risks model with partially observed failure causes under improved adaptive type-II progressive censoring," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(4), pages 765-780, August.
    8. Wu, Shuo-Jye & Huang, Syuan-Rong, 2012. "Progressively first-failure censored reliability sampling plans with cost constraint," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 2018-2030.
    9. Mazen Nassar & Refah Alotaibi & Ahmed Elshahhat, 2023. "Reliability Estimation of XLindley Constant-Stress Partially Accelerated Life Tests using Progressively Censored Samples," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Neha Goel & Hare Krishna, 2022. "Different methods of estimation in two parameter Geometric distribution with randomly censored data," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(4), pages 1652-1665, August.
    11. Wenjie Zhang & Wenhao Gui, 2022. "Statistical Inference and Optimal Design of Accelerated Life Testing for the Chen Distribution under Progressive Type-II Censoring," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Kousik Maiti & Suchandan Kayal, 2023. "Estimating Reliability Characteristics of the Log-Logistic Distribution Under Progressive Censoring with Two Applications," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 89-128, February.
    13. J. McGree & J. Eccleston, 2010. "Investigating design for survival models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 295-311, November.
    14. Antonio Pievatolo & Fabrizio Ruggeri & Refik Soyer & Simon Wilson, 2021. "Decisions in Risk and Reliability: An Explanatory Perspective," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Arturo Fernández, 2009. "Weibull inference using trimmed samples and prior information," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 119-136, January.
    16. Eduardo Gutiérrez González & José Villaseñor Alva & Olga Panteleeva & Humberto Vaquera Huerta, 2013. "On testing the log-gamma distribution hypothesis by bootstrap," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 2761-2776, December.
    17. T. Fischer & U. Kamps, 2013. "Power maps in goodness-of-fit testing," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1365-1382, June.
    18. Sen, Ananda & Kannan, Nandini & Kundu, Debasis, 2013. "Bayesian planning and inference of a progressively censored sample from linear hazard rate distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 108-121.
    19. Saralees Nadarajah & Gauss Cordeiro & Edwin Ortega, 2013. "The exponentiated Weibull distribution: a survey," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 839-877, August.
    20. Ritwik Bhattacharya, 2020. "Implementation of compound optimal design strategy in censored life-testing experiment," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(4), pages 1029-1050, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:36:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s00180-020-01021-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.