IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v28y2013i3p1365-1382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power maps in goodness-of-fit testing

Author

Listed:
  • T. Fischer
  • U. Kamps

Abstract

For classical goodness-of-fit tests as well as for their modified versions in case of Type-II right censored data, results of a simulation study are presented, where the powers of the tests under consideration against beta alternatives are illustrated in informative, user-oriented plots that offer the possibility to directly choose the best test statistic in a concrete situation, when some prior belief about the alternative is available. The behavior of powers of respective statistical tests as functions of beta parameters is examined and discussed. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2013

Suggested Citation

  • T. Fischer & U. Kamps, 2013. "Power maps in goodness-of-fit testing," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1365-1382, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:28:y:2013:i:3:p:1365-1382
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-012-0361-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00180-012-0361-x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-012-0361-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Xingzhong & Ding, Xiaobo & Zhao, Shuran, 2009. "New goodness-of-fit tests based on fiducial empirical distribution function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1132-1141, February.
    2. Saldaña-Zepeda, Dayna P. & Vaquera-Huerta, Humberto & Arnold, Barry C., 2010. "A goodness of fit test for the Pareto distribution in the presence of Type II censoring, based on the cumulative hazard function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 833-842, April.
    3. Neuhaus, Georg, 1976. "Asymptotic power properties of the Cramér-von Mises test under contiguous alternatives," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 95-110, March.
    4. Meintanis, Simos G., 2008. "A new approach of goodness-of-fit testing for exponentiated laws applied to the generalized Rayleigh distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2496-2503, January.
    5. Jonggun Lim & Sangun Park, 2007. "Censored Kullback-Leibler Information and Goodness-of-Fit Test with Type II Censored Data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9), pages 1051-1064.
    6. Clemons, Traci E. & Jr., Edwin L. Bradley, 2000. "A nonparametric measure of the overlapping coefficient," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 51-61, July.
    7. Norbert Henze & Simos G. Meintanis, 2005. "Recent and classical tests for exponentiality: a partial review with comparisons," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 29-45, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meintanis, Simos G. & Tsionas, Efthimios, 2010. "Testing for the generalized normal-Laplace distribution with applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 3174-3180, December.
    2. Dante Amengual & Marine Carrasco & Enrique Sentana, 2017. "Testing Distributional Assumptions Using a Continuum of Moments," Working Papers wp2018_1709, CEMFI.
    3. Asok K. Nanda & Shovan Chowdhury, 2021. "Shannon's Entropy and Its Generalisations Towards Statistical Inference in Last Seven Decades," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 167-185, April.
    4. Jovanović, Milan & Milošević, Bojana & Nikitin, Ya. Yu. & Obradović, Marko & Volkova, K. Yu., 2015. "Tests of exponentiality based on Arnold–Villasenor characterization and their efficiencies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 100-113.
    5. Gordon Anderson & Oliver Linton & Yoon-Jae Wang, 2009. "Non Parametric Estimation of a Polarization Measure," Working Papers tecipa-363, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    6. Wang, Dan & Tian, Lili, 2017. "Parametric methods for confidence interval estimation of overlap coefficients," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 12-26.
    7. Sudheesh K. Kattumannil & P. Anisha, 2019. "A simple non-parametric test for decreasing mean time to failure," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 73-87, February.
    8. Dencker Peter & Liese Friedrich, 2004. "Local maximin properties of tests in Gaussian shift experiments," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 22(2/2004), pages 83-108, February.
    9. Aurea Grané, 2012. "Exact goodness-of-fit tests for censored data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 64(6), pages 1187-1203, December.
    10. Baringhaus, L. & Henze, N., 2008. "A new weighted integral goodness-of-fit statistic for exponentiality," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(8), pages 1006-1016, June.
    11. Daojiang He & Xingzhong Xu, 2013. "A goodness-of-fit testing approach for normality based on the posterior predictive distribution," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Ruhul Ali Khan & Dhrubasish Bhattacharyya & Murari Mitra, 2021. "Exact and asymptotic tests of exponentiality against nonmonotonic mean time to failure type alternatives," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 3015-3045, December.
    13. Bojana Milošević & Marko Obradović, 2016. "New class of exponentiality tests based on U-empirical Laplace transform," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 977-990, December.
    14. Marija Cuparić & Bojana Milošević, 2022. "New characterization-based exponentiality tests for randomly censored data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(2), pages 461-487, June.
    15. Baringhaus, Ludwig & Taherizadeh, Fatemeh, 2010. "Empirical Hankel transforms and its applications to goodness-of-fit tests," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(6), pages 1445-1457, July.
    16. Bojana Milošević, 2016. "Asymptotic efficiency of new exponentiality tests based on a characterization," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 79(2), pages 221-236, February.
    17. M. Anis, 2011. "Comments on “Testing for NBUL using goodness of fit approach with applications” (Statistical Papers (2010) 51: 27–40, DOI 10.1007/s00362-007-0113-0)," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 743-747, August.
    18. Gerrit Lodewicus Grobler & Elzanie Bothma & James Samuel Allison, 2022. "Testing for the Rayleigh Distribution: A New Test with Comparisons to Tests for Exponentiality Based on Transformed Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Aurea Grané & Josep Fortiana, 2011. "A directional test of exponentiality based on maximum correlations," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 255-274, March.
    20. Eduardo Gutiérrez González & José Villaseñor Alva & Olga Panteleeva & Humberto Vaquera Huerta, 2013. "On testing the log-gamma distribution hypothesis by bootstrap," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 2761-2776, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:28:y:2013:i:3:p:1365-1382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.