IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v34y2019i4d10.1007_s00180-019-00882-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consistency of survey opinions and external data

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Ackerman

    (Temple University)

Abstract

The Soul of the Community Survey was conducted in twenty-six communities in the United States in the years 2008, 2009, and 2010. Respondents were asked to rate their community in terms of quality of life, social offerings, and other aspects to determine the qualities that cause people to be most attached to their community. This paper focuses on describing the geographic distribution of responses to several of the questions within one of the communities, Long Beach, CA. We first provide a general description of the city and compare the geographic distribution of population, income, and race of survey respondents with external data. With this demographic profile in mind, we analyze respondents’ ratings of local safety, availability of green spaces, and quality of local public schools to see if they are consistent with external data sources. In the case of public school quality, where these ratings appear inconsistent, we propose an explanation to resolve this.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Ackerman, 2019. "Consistency of survey opinions and external data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1489-1509, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:34:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s00180-019-00882-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-019-00882-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-019-00882-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-019-00882-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heike Hofmann & Hadley Wickham & Dianne Cook, 2019. "The 2013 Data Expo of the American Statistical Association," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1443-1447, December.
    2. Lumley, Thomas, 2004. "Analysis of Complex Survey Samples," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 9(i08).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heike Hofmann & Hadley Wickham & Dianne Cook, 2019. "The 2013 Data Expo of the American Statistical Association," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1443-1447, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalia da Silva & Ignacio Alvarez-Castro, 2019. "Clicks and cliques: exploring the soul of the community," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1537-1563, December.
    2. Maciej Berk{e}sewicz & Herman Cherniaiev & Robert Pater, 2021. "Estimating the number of entities with vacancies using administrative and online data," Papers 2106.03263, arXiv.org.
    3. J. Michael Brick & Michael E. Jones, 2008. "Propensity to respond and nonresponse bias," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(1), pages 51-73.
    4. Jacques Muthusi & Samuel Mwalili & Peter Young, 2019. "%svy_logistic_regression: A generic SAS macro for simple and multiple logistic regression and creating quality publication-ready tables using survey or non-survey data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Jonathan Wakefield & Taylor Okonek & Jon Pedersen, 2020. "Small Area Estimation for Disease Prevalence Mapping," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 398-418, August.
    6. Alex Fenton, 2013. "Small-area measures of income poverty," CASE Papers case173, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    7. repec:cep:sticas:/173 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Mei‐Chih Meg Tseng & Yi‐Ping Lin & Fu‐Chang Hu & Tsun‐Jen Cheng, 2013. "Risks Perception of Electromagnetic Fields in Taiwan: The Influence of Psychopathology and the Degree of Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(11), pages 2002-2012, November.
    9. Raphael Nishimura & James Wagner & Michael Elliott, 2016. "Alternative Indicators for the Risk of Non-response Bias: A Simulation Study," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 43-62, April.
    10. Camelia Herman & Colleen M. Leonard & Perpetua Uhomoibhi & Mark Maire & Delynn Moss & Uwem Inyang & Ado Abubakar & Abiodun Ogunniyi & Nwando Mba & Stacie M. Greby & McPaul I. Okoye & Nnaemeka C. Iriem, 2023. "Non-falciparum malaria infection and IgG seroprevalence among children under 15 years in Nigeria, 2018," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Elijah O. Onsomu & DaKysha Moore & Benta A. Abuya & Peggy Valentine & Vanessa Duren-Winfield, 2013. "Importance of the Media in Scaling-Up HIV Testing in Kenya," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440134, July.
    12. Vinas-Forcade, Jennifer & Seijas, María Noé, 2021. "To teach or not to teach: Negative selection into the teaching profession in Uruguay," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Lenis, David & Ackerman, Benjamin & Stuart, Elizabeth A., 2018. "Measuring model misspecification: Application to propensity score methods with complex survey data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 48-57.
    14. Sofia Gil-Clavel & Emilio Zagheni & Valeria Bordone, 2022. "Close Social Networks Among Older Adults: The Online and Offline Perspectives," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(3), pages 1111-1135, June.
    15. Matthew R. Williams & Terrance D. Savitsky, 2021. "Uncertainty Estimation for Pseudo‐Bayesian Inference Under Complex Sampling," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 72-107, April.
    16. Jeanna Parsons Leigh & Kirsten Fiest & Rebecca Brundin-Mather & Kara Plotnikoff & Andrea Soo & Emma E Sypes & Liam Whalen-Browne & Sofia B Ahmed & Karen E A Burns & Alison Fox-Robichaud & Shelly Kupsc, 2020. "A national cross-sectional survey of public perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic: Self-reported beliefs, knowledge, and behaviors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Wang, Jianqiang C., 2012. "Sample distribution function based goodness-of-fit test for complex surveys," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 664-679.
    18. Alejandro Aybar-Flores & Alvaro Talavera & Elizabeth Espinoza-Portilla, 2023. "Predicting the HIV/AIDS Knowledge among the Adolescent and Young Adult Population in Peru: Application of Quasi-Binomial Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Algorithms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-29, March.
    19. Joseph R Starnes & Chiara Di Gravio & Rebecca Irlmeier & Ryan Moore & Vincent Okoth & Ash Rogers & Daniele J Ressler & Troy D Moon, 2021. "Characterizing multidimensional poverty in Migori County, Kenya and its association with depression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-10, November.
    20. Andee J. Kaplan & Eric R. Hare, 2019. "Putting down roots: a graphical exploration of community attachment," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1449-1464, December.
    21. Christian A. Maino Vieytes & Ruoqing Zhu & Francesca Gany & Amirah Burton-Obanla & Anna E. Arthur, 2022. "Empirical Dietary Patterns Associated with Food Insecurity in U.S. Cancer Survivors: NHANES 1999–2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:34:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s00180-019-00882-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.