IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v157y2019i1d10.1007_s10584-019-02466-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contextualizing climate science: applying social learning systems theory to knowledge production, climate services, and use-inspired research

Author

Listed:
  • Gigi Owen

    (University of Arizona)

  • Daniel B. Ferguson

    (University of Arizona)

  • Ben McMahan

    (University of Arizona)

Abstract

Scientists need to acknowledge the inherent social contexts that drive the scientific process if they want their research to improve complex societal problems such as vulnerability to climate change. Social interactions and relationships are essential elements for conducting use-inspired research, creating usable knowledge, and providing climate services. The Climate Assessment for the Southwest (CLIMAS) program was founded on theories of use-inspired research and co-producing knowledge with non-academic partners. A recent program evaluation illuminated gaps in these underlying program models and led to the inclusion of social learning systems theory and communities of practice. Using grounded examples, we demonstrate the CLIMAS program’s ongoing role in fostering, maintaining, and expanding a climate resilience social learning system in the U.S. Southwest. Broader implications from the evaluation focus on the importance of establishing and maintaining relationships, increasing institutional and individual flexibility in response to change, and improving the practice of transdisciplinarity. These findings inform new program evaluation metrics and data collection techniques. This paper contributes to current theory and practice of use-inspired science and climate services by identifying and demonstrating how social interactions inform climate knowledge production. The reconceptualization of the CLIMAS program as part of a growing regional social learning system serves as an example for similar types of programs. We encourage climate services and use-inspired research programs to explore applications of this framework to their own operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Gigi Owen & Daniel B. Ferguson & Ben McMahan, 2019. "Contextualizing climate science: applying social learning systems theory to knowledge production, climate services, and use-inspired research," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 151-170, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:157:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10584-019-02466-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-019-02466-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-019-02466-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-019-02466-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris D. Hewitt & Roger C. Stone & Andrew B. Tait, 2017. "Improving the use of climate information in decision-making," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(9), pages 614-616, September.
    2. Clark, William C. & van Kerkhoff, Lorrae & Lebel, Louis & Gallopin, Gilberto, 2016. "Crafting Usuable Knowledge for Sustainable Development," Working Paper Series 16-005, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    3. Jahn, Thomas & Bergmann, Matthias & Keil, Florian, 2012. "Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-10.
    4. Tiago Capela Lourenço & Rob Swart & Hasse Goosen & Roger Street, 2016. "The rise of demand-driven climate services," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 13-14, January.
    5. W. Neil Adger & Katrina Brown & Donald R. Nelson & Fikret Berkes & Hallie Eakin & Carl Folke & Kathleen Galvin & Lance Gunderson & Marisa Goulden & Karen O'Brien & Jack Ruitenbeek & Emma L. Tompkins, 2011. "Resilience implications of policy responses to climate change," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(5), pages 757-766, September.
    6. Catherine Vaughan & Suraje Dessai, 2014. "Climate services for society: origins, institutional arrangements, and design elements for an evaluation framework," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(5), pages 587-603, September.
    7. McNie, Elizabeth C. & Parris, Adam & Sarewitz, Daniel, 2016. "Improving the public value of science: A typology to inform discussion, design and implementation of research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 884-895.
    8. Chris Caswill & Elizabeth Shove, 2000. "Introducing interactive social science," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 154-157, June.
    9. Mark Pelling & Chris High & John Dearing & Denis Smith, 2008. "Shadow Spaces for Social Learning: A Relational Understanding of Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change within Organisations," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(4), pages 867-884, April.
    10. Chris Hewitt & Simon Mason & David Walland, 2012. "The Global Framework for Climate Services," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(12), pages 831-832, December.
    11. Steve Woolgar, 2000. "Social basis of interactive social science," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 165-173, June.
    12. Maria Carmen Lemos & Christine J. Kirchhoff & Vijay Ramprasad, 2012. "Narrowing the climate information usability gap," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(11), pages 789-794, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aparna Bamzai-Dodson & Renee A. McPherson, 2022. "When Do Climate Services Achieve Societal Impact? Evaluations of Actionable Climate Adaptation Science," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Morgan Gray & Elisabeth Micheli & Tosha Comendant & Adina Merenlender, 2020. "Climate-Wise Habitat Connectivity Takes Sustained Stakeholder Engagement," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meghan Alexander & Suraje Dessai, 2019. "What can climate services learn from the broader services literature?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 133-149, November.
    2. Mehryar, Sara & Sasson, Idan & Surminski, Swenja, 2022. "Supporting urban adaptation to climate change: what role can resilience measurement tools play?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113367, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Surminski, Swenja & Barnes, Jonathan & Vincent, Katharine, 2022. "Can insurance catalyse government planning on climate? Emergent evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    4. Roger B. Street & Patrick Pringle & Tiago Capela Lourenço & Mariana Nicolletti, 2019. "Transferability of decision-support tools," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 523-538, April.
    5. Charles Herrick & Jason Vogel, 2022. "Climate Adaptation at the Local Scale: Using Federal Climate Adaptation Policy Regimes to Enhance Climate Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Kevin Raaphorst & Gerben Koers & Gerald Jan Ellen & Amy Oen & Bjørn Kalsnes & Lisa van Well & Jana Koerth & Rutger van der Brugge, 2020. "Mind the Gap: Towards a Typology of Climate Service Usability Gaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Kirsten Halsnæs & Lisa Bay & Mads Lykke Dømgaard & Per Skougaard Kaspersen & Morten Andreas Dahl Larsen, 2020. "Accelerating Climate Service Development for Renewable Energy, Finance and Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Svenja Keele, 2019. "Consultants and the business of climate services: implications of shifting from public to private science," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 9-26, November.
    9. Deborah R. Coen & Adam Sobel, 2022. "Introduction: Critical and historical perspectives on usable climate science," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 1-9, May.
    10. Mehryar, Sara & Sasson, Idan & Surminski, Swenja, 2021. "Supporting urban adaptation to climate change: what role can resilience measurement tools play?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111057, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Surminski, Swenja & Barnes, Jonathan & Vincent, Katharine, 2022. "Can insurance catalyse government planning on climate? Emergent evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113564, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Maurice Skelton, 2020. "How cognitive links and decision-making capacity shape sectoral experts’ recognition of climate knowledge for adaptation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1535-1553, October.
    13. Eric Nost, 2019. "Climate services for whom? The political economics of contextualizing climate data in Louisiana’s coastal Master Plan," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 27-42, November.
    14. Blane Harvey & Lindsey Jones & Logan Cochrane & Roop Singh, 2019. "The evolving landscape of climate services in sub-Saharan Africa: What roles have NGOs played?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 81-98, November.
    15. Sophie Webber, 2019. "Putting climate services in contexts: advancing multi-disciplinary understandings: introduction to the special issue," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 1-8, November.
    16. Jhannel Tomlinson & Kevon Rhiney, 2018. "Assessing the role of farmer field schools in promoting pro-adaptive behaviour towards climate change among Jamaican farmers," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(1), pages 86-98, March.
    17. Elena Lioubimtseva & Charlotte da Cunha, 2023. "The Role of Non-Climate Data in Equitable Climate Adaptation Planning: Lessons from Small French and American Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Benedikt Fecher & Freia Kuper & Nataliia Sokolovska & Alex Fenton & Stefan Hornbostel & Gert G. Wagner, 2021. "Understanding the Societal Impact of the Social Sciences and Humanities: Remarks on Roles, Challenges, and Expectations," RatSWD Working Papers 276, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    19. Momtaz Jahan & Julia Reis & Julie Shortridge, 2023. "Assessing climate service products with evaluation metrics: an application to decision support tools for climate change adaptation in the USA," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(8), pages 1-25, August.
    20. Stefan Liehr & Julia Röhrig & Marion Mehring & Thomas Kluge, 2017. "How the Social-Ecological Systems Concept Can Guide Transdisciplinary Research and Implementation: Addressing Water Challenges in Central Northern Namibia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:157:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10584-019-02466-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.