IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/chinre/v14y2021i3d10.1007_s12187-021-09802-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preadolescents’ Stereotypical Occupational Preferences: a Matter of Competence or Culture?

Author

Listed:
  • Laora Mastari

    (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)

  • Bram Spruyt

    (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)

  • Jessy Siongers

    (Vrije Universiteit Brussel
    Ghent University)

Abstract

One of the clearest manifestations of how gender norms come into play, is the overrepresentation of men and women in gender stereotypical occupations. Therefore, this paper studies occupational preferences and their relationship with perceived gender typicality, perceived pressure for gender conformity from friends and discontent with gender boundaries among preadolescents (N = 795) in the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium (Flanders). Discriminant analysis enables us to develop an original and sensitive measure for gendered preferences. Subsequently, we use multivariate regression analyses to study the variation in gendered occupational preferences. Models are separately estimated for boys (n = 395) and girls (n = 400) and further include their academic self-concept, socio-economic and socio-cultural background. The main finding of this study indicates that boys’ and girls’ stereotypical occupational preferences are differently related to gender norms. While boys’ gender stereotypical preferences relate to their perceived pressure for gender conformity from friends, this does not apply to girls. For girls, the results indicate that their stereotypical occupational preferences reflect an important part of their gender typical identity. Moreover, girls who feel confident about their academic capabilities aspire less gender stereotypical occupations. The results also indicate the relevance of considering socio-economic and socio-cultural background variables when studying preadolescents’ occupational preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Laora Mastari & Bram Spruyt & Jessy Siongers, 2021. "Preadolescents’ Stereotypical Occupational Preferences: a Matter of Competence or Culture?," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(3), pages 1199-1225, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:14:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s12187-021-09802-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s12187-021-09802-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12187-021-09802-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12187-021-09802-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raúl Navarro & Elisa Larrañaga & Santiago Yubero, 2016. "Gender Identity, Gender-Typed Personality Traits and School Bullying: Victims, Bullies and Bully-Victims," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Kay, Aaron C. & Jost, John T., 2003. "Complementary Justice: Effects of "Poor But Happy" and "Poor But Honest" Stereotype Exemplars on System Justification and Implicit Activation of the Justice Motive," Research Papers 1753r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roland Bénabou & Jean Tirole, 2006. "Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(2), pages 699-746.
    2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:12:y:2017:i:5:p:507-515 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Matej Avbelj & Janez Šušteršič, 2019. "Conceptual Framework and Empirical Methodology for Measuring Multidimensional Judicial Ideology," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 2, pages 129-159, June.
    4. Nikhil K. Sengupta & Chris G. Sibley, 2019. "The Political Attitudes and Subjective Wellbeing of the One Percent," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(7), pages 2125-2140, October.
    5. Lawton K. Swan & John R. Chambers & Martin Heesacker & Sondre S. Nero, 2017. "How should we measure Americans’ perceptions of socio-economic mobility?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 12(5), pages 507-515, September.
    6. Jim A C Everett, 2013. "The 12 Item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Proudfoot, Devon & Kay, Aaron C. & Mann, Heather, 2015. "Motivated employee blindness: The impact of labor market instability on judgment of organizational inefficiencies," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 108-122.
    8. John T. Jost & Melanie Langer & Vishal Singh, 2017. "The Politics of Buying, Boycotting, Complaining, and Disputing: An Extension of the Research Program by Jung, Garbarino, Briley, and Wynhausen," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 503-510.
    9. Coelho Do Vale, R.M.R.D., 2007. "Consumption breakdowns : On avoiding and embracing temptations," Other publications TiSEM 245c52fa-24eb-45e6-9c19-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Shepherd, Steven & Kay, Aaron C. & Gray, Kurt, 2019. "Military veterans are morally typecast as agentic but unfeeling: Implications for veteran employment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 75-88.
    11. Anthony Snider & Shanhong Luo & Theresa Schell & Jeffery Hill, 2021. "Comparing Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors between an Indigenous and a Non-indigenous Sample from New Zealand and the United States of America," Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Suzanne Horwitz & Balázs Kovács, 2018. "Reviewer social class influences responses to online evaluations of an organization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, October.
    13. Rajesh Iyer & James A. Muncy, 2016. "Attitude toward Consumption and Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 48-67, March.
    14. Belmi, Peter & Neale, Margaret, 2014. "Mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s the fairest of them all? Thinking that one is attractive increases the tendency to support inequality," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 133-149.
    15. Joanna Sterling & John T Jost & Patrick E Shrout, 2016. "Mortality Salience, System Justification, and Candidate Evaluations in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Catherine Verniers & Jorge Vala, 2018. "Justifying gender discrimination in the workplace: The mediating role of motherhood myths," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, January.
    17. Filippo Rutto & Silvia Russo & Cristina Mosso, 2014. "Development and Validation of a Democratic System Justification Scale," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 645-655, September.
    18. Federica Durante & Mirco Fasolo & Silvia Mari & Andrea F. Mazzola, 2014. "Children’s Attitudes and Stereotype Content Toward Thin, Average-Weight, and Overweight Peers," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, May.
    19. Laurin, Kristin & Kay, Aaron C. & Proudfoot, Devon & Fitzsimons, Gavan J., 2013. "Response to restrictive policies: Reconciling system justification and psychological reactance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 152-162.
    20. Tine Bock & Iris Vermeir & Patrick Kenhove, 2013. "“What’s the Harm in Being Unethical? These Strangers are Rich Anyway!” Exploring Underlying Factors of Double Standards," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 225-240, January.
    21. Jost, John T. & Blount, Sally & Pfeffer, Jeffrey & Hunyady, Gyorgy, 2003. "Fair Market Ideology: Its Cognitive-Motivational Underpinnings," Research Papers 1816, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:14:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s12187-021-09802-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.