IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ariqol/v19y2024i2d10.1007_s11482-023-10261-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Meaningfulness, Law Abidance, and Social Risk Among Hong Kong Youth

Author

Listed:
  • Chau-kiu Cheung

    (City University of Hong Kong)

  • Cindy Xinshan Jia

    (South China Agricultural University)

  • Jieyi Hu

    (Jinan University)

Abstract

There is debate over whether following state laws helps young people, especially those at risk for social exclusion, find meaning in their lives. The help rests on existentialist and terror management theories, which hold that maintaining security, especially when it is under risk, is meaningful to life. However, alternative views that state law is authoritarian, illiberal, oppressive, and therefore useless cast doubt on this help. Instead, the views hold that social risk is tolerable and thus meaningful. To clarify the debate, this study examined data from a random-sample survey of 2,175 Chinese youths in Hong Kong. Findings show that agreement to the law contributes to life meaningfulness, particularly by reducing the adverse effects of social risk awareness. Moreover, a quadratic effect emerged in that the contribution rose with the agreement. These findings suggest the value of encouraging law abidance and preventing social risk based on existentialist and terror management theories to increase youth's life meaningfulness.

Suggested Citation

  • Chau-kiu Cheung & Cindy Xinshan Jia & Jieyi Hu, 2024. "Life Meaningfulness, Law Abidance, and Social Risk Among Hong Kong Youth," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 19(2), pages 709-726, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:19:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11482-023-10261-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11482-023-10261-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11482-023-10261-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11482-023-10261-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maja Kutlaca & Martijn van Zomeren & Kai Epstude, 2020. "Friends or foes? How activists and non-activists perceive and evaluate each other," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Ivar Krumpal, 2013. "Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2025-2047, June.
    3. Éric Montpetit, 2012. "Does Holding Beliefs with Conviction Prevent Policy Actors from Adopting a Compromising Attitude?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 60(3), pages 621-642, October.
    4. Joseph J. Sabia & Brittany Bass, 2017. "Do anti-bullying laws work? New evidence on school safety and youth violence," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 473-502, April.
    5. Roberto Zotti & Nino Speziale & Cristian Barra, 2016. "On the causal effect of religiosity on life satisfaction using a propensity score matching technique," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1031-1048, October.
    6. Bruno Damásio & Silvia Koller, 2015. "Complex Experiences of Meaning in Life: Individual Differences Among Sociodemographic Variables, Sources of Meaning and Psychological Functioning," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 161-181, August.
    7. Alexander L. Janus, 2010. "The Influence of Social Desirability Pressures on Expressed Immigration Attitudes," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 91(4), pages 928-946, December.
    8. Michael L. Goodman & Derrick C. Gibson & Philip H. Keiser & Stanley Gitari & Lauren Raimer-Goodman, 2019. "Family, Belonging and Meaning in Life Among Semi-rural Kenyans," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 1627-1645, June.
    9. Philipp Babcicky & Sebastian Seebauer, 2017. "The two faces of social capital in private flood mitigation: opposing effects on risk perception, self-efficacy and coping capacity," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 1017-1037, August.
    10. Daniel T. L. Shek & Xiaoqin Zhu & Xiang Li & Diya Dou, 2022. "Satisfaction with HyFlex Teaching and Law-abiding Leadership Education in Hong Kong University Students Under COVID-19," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(5), pages 2833-2858, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Rinken & S. Pasadas-del-Amo & M. Rueda & B. Cobo, 2021. "No magic bullet: estimating anti-immigrant sentiment and social desirability bias with the item-count technique," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 2139-2159, December.
    2. Carroll, Eamonn & Timmons, Shane & McGinnity, Frances, 2023. "Experimental tests of public support for disability policy," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS159.
    3. McGinnity, Frances & Creighton, Mathew & Fahey, Éamonn, 2020. "Hidden versus revealed attitudes: a list experiment on support for minorities in Ireland," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number BKMNEXT372.
    4. Fahey, Éamonn & O'Brien, Doireann & Russell, Helen & McGinnity, Fran, 2019. "European survey data on attitudes to equality groups and human rights," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number SUSTAT83.
    5. Danielly Sorato & Martin Lundsteen & Carme Colominas Ventura & Diana Zavala-Rojas, 2024. "Using word embeddings for immigrant and refugee stereotype quantification in a diachronic and multilingual setting," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 469-521, April.
    6. Dasgupta Kabir & Pacheco Gail, 2018. "Warrantless Arrest Laws for Domestic Violence: How Are Youth Affected?," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Aycinena, Diego & Bogliacino, Francesco & Kimbrough, Erik O., 2024. "Measuring norms: Assessing the threat of social desirability bias to the Bicchieri and Xiao elicitation method," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 225-239.
    8. Kai Greenlees & Randolph Cornelius, 2021. "The promise of panarchy in managed retreat: converging psychological perspectives and complex adaptive systems theory," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(3), pages 503-510, September.
    9. Sergio D. Mahinay, Jr. & Sophia Mariefer G. Ramirez & Precious Ferly Mae V. Rojo & Donna Saira L. De Gama & Camille R. Viloan, 2023. "Level of Readiness of Education Students for Hy Flex Modality," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(10), pages 1913-1930, October.
    10. Michael T Gastner & Károly Takács & Máté Gulyás & Zsuzsanna Szvetelszky & Beáta Oborny, 2019. "The impact of hypocrisy on opinion formation: A dynamic model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Babette Bühler & Katja Möhring & Andreas P. Weiland, 2022. "Assessing dissimilarity of employment history information from survey and administrative data using sequence analysis techniques," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4747-4774, December.
    12. Simone Schüller, 2016. "The Effects of 9/11 on Attitudes toward Immigration and the Moderating Role of Education," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(4), pages 604-632, November.
    13. Sjöstedt, Martin & Sundström, Aksel & Jagers, Sverker C. & Ntuli, Herbert, 2022. "Governance through community policing: What makes citizens report poaching of wildlife to state officials?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    14. Tricia Koroknay†Palicz & Joao Montalvao, 2020. "Sex, Lies, and Surveys: The Role of Interviewer Characteristics," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(4), pages 3313-3324.
    15. Adrian Chadi & Matthias Krapf, 2017. "The Protestant Fiscal Ethic: Religious Confession And Euro Skepticism In Germany," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(4), pages 1813-1832, October.
    16. Burke, Mary A. & Carman, Katherine G., 2017. "You can be too thin (but not too tall): Social desirability bias in self-reports of weight and height," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 198-222.
    17. Shinichi Kitano, 2021. "Estimation of Determinants of Farmland Abandonment and Its Data Problems," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Burgstaller, Lilith & Feld, Lars P. & Pfeil, Katharina, 2022. "Working in the shadow: Survey techniques for measuring and explaining undeclared work," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 661-671.
    19. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna Helen & Cerutti, Nicola & Danilov, Anastasia & Friedrichsen, Jana & Liu, Yiming & Süer, Müge, 2021. "Face masks increase compliance with physical distancing recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 139-158.
    20. Halima Albalushi & Mohamed Al Mushaiqri & Srinivasa Rao Sirasanagandla & Srijit Das, 2022. "Students’ Performance in Face-to-Face, Online, and Hybrid Methods of Teaching and Assessment in Anatomy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-10, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:19:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11482-023-10261-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.