Justifying a high-speed rail project: social value vs. regional growth
This article establishes a relationship between the net present value (NPV) of a High-Speed Rail (HSR) project and its social value, its transportation consumers` surplus (TCS) and its regional economic impact in terms of growth. First, it is shown that if the NPV is positive, it may generate growth even if no bottleneck exists. Second, when shadow-pricing and externalities are included in the calculations, and the HSR demand has been forecasted by a multinomial logit model, the NPV differs from its net economic impact. For instance, one variant of the project, though acceptable, reduces growth elsewhere in the economy. Decision-making is then in a quandary.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 31 (1997)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Note:||Received: April 1996 / Accepted: May 1996|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.springer.com|
|Order Information:||Web: http://link.springer.com/journal/168|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:anresc:v:31:y:1997:i:2:p:155-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)or (Rebekah McClure)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.