IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v346y2025i2d10.1007_s10479-024-06086-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing risks in technological R&D projects with Probability-Impact AHPSort

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina López

    (University Pablo de Olavide)

  • Arash Moheimani

    (NEOMA Business School)

  • Alessio Ishizaka

    (NEOMA Business School)

Abstract

Fostering technological innovation is essential for firms to survive in increasingly turbulent business ecosystems. Research and Development (R&D) projects are the lifeblood of technological innovations, but they typically face significant risks. The occurrence of risk hampers the proper development of R&D projects, which can have serious economic impacts on the firm. These impacts can be mitigated through proper risk management. According to ISO 31000, this requires analyzing both the impact and the probability of risk occurrence simultaneously. Existing methods in the literature do not address both simultaneously but rather focus on either the impact or the probability of occurrence. Moreover, these methods are not capable of sorting projects based on their level of exposure to risk, which would support managers in decision-making. With these gaps in mind, this study proposes a novel Probability-Impact method based on the adaptation of AHPSort. Its applicability is demonstrated through the risk assessment of five technological R&D projects developed by an engineering firm. The findings highlight that legal, user, external party, and technological risks significantly threaten technological R&D projects. Concrete management actions are provided to successfully mitigate these risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina López & Arash Moheimani & Alessio Ishizaka, 2025. "Managing risks in technological R&D projects with Probability-Impact AHPSort," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(2), pages 1285-1320, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:346:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-024-06086-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-024-06086-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-024-06086-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-024-06086-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristina López & Alessio Ishizaka & Muhammet Gul & Melih Yücesan & Daniela Valencia, 2022. "A calibrated Fuzzy Best-Worst-method to reinforce supply chain resilience during the COVID 19 pandemic," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(9), pages 1968-1991, October.
    2. Vaida Zemlickienė & Zenonas Turskis, 2022. "Performance Measurement in R&D Projects: Relevance of Indicators Based on US and German Experts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Alessio Ishizaka & Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan & Simonov Kusi-Sarpong & Iram Naim, 2022. "Sustainable warehouse evaluation with AHPSort traffic light visualisation and post-optimal analysis method," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(3), pages 558-575, March.
    4. Ali Emrouznejad & Marianna Marra, 2017. "The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6653-6675, November.
    5. Sarah Cheah & Cristiano Bellavitis & Alessandro Muscio, 2021. "The impact of technology complexity on the financial performance of R&D projects: evidence from Singapore," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 431-458, April.
    6. Lizarralde, Rafael & Ganzarain, Jaione & Zubizarreta, Mikel, 2022. "Adaptation of the MIVES method for the strategic selection of new technologies at an R&D centre. Focus on the manufacturing sector," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. Ute Laermann-Nguyen & Martin Backfisch, 2021. "Innovation crisis in the pharmaceutical industry? A survey," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(12), pages 1-37, December.
    8. Angel L. Meroño-Cerdán & Carolina López-Nicolás & Francisco J. Molina-Castillo, 2018. "Risk aversion, innovation and performance in family firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 189-203, February.
    9. Lolli, F. & Ishizaka, A. & Gamberini, R., 2014. "New AHP-based approaches for multi-criteria inventory classification," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 62-74.
    10. Seh-Hyun Yoo & Chang-Yang Lee, 2023. "Technological diversification, technology portfolio properties, and R&D productivity," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 2074-2105, December.
    11. Luis Serrano-Gomez & Jose Ignacio Munoz-Hernandez, 2019. "Monte Carlo approach to fuzzy AHP risk analysis in renewable energy construction projects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Alessio Ishizaka & Markus Lusti, 2006. "How to derive priorities in AHP: a comparative study," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 14(4), pages 387-400, December.
    13. Jana Krejčí & Alessio Ishizaka, 2018. "FAHPSort: A Fuzzy Extension of the AHPSort Method," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1119-1145, July.
    14. Ali, Mahmood & Zhou, Li & Miller, Lloyd & Ieromonachou, Petros, 2016. "User resistance in IT: A literature review," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 35-43.
    15. Sarah Ben Amor & Fateh Belaid & Ramzi Benkraiem & Boumediene Ramdani & Khaled Guesmi, 2023. "Multi-criteria classification, sorting, and clustering: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 771-793, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerda Ana Melnik-Leroy & Gintautas Dzemyda, 2021. "How to Influence the Results of MCDM?—Evidence of the Impact of Cognitive Biases," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Liang, Yingying & Qin, Jindong & Ishizaka, Alessio, 2025. "Assessment of digital economy development with the new multicriteria sorting method: DCMSort," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. C. Acuña-Soto & V. Liern & B. Pérez-Gladish, 2021. "Normalization in TOPSIS-based approaches with data of different nature: application to the ranking of mathematical videos," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 541-569, January.
    4. Bice Cavallo, 2019. "Coherent weights for pairwise comparison matrices and a mixed-integer linear programming problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 143-161, September.
    5. Jiangdong Bao & Jan Johansson & Jingdong Zhang, 2017. "An Occupational Disease Assessment of the Mining Industry’s Occupational Health and Safety Management System Based on FMEA and an Improved AHP Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
    6. Hu, Qiwei & Chakhar, Salem & Siraj, Sajid & Labib, Ashraf, 2017. "Spare parts classification in industrial manufacturing using the dominance-based rough set approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1136-1163.
    7. Vijay Pereira & Umesh Bamel, 2023. "Charting the managerial and theoretical evolutionary path of AHP using thematic and systematic review: a decadal (2012–2021) study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 635-651, July.
    8. Rafael Lizarralde & Jaione Ganzarain & Mikel Zubizarreta, 2020. "Assessment and Selection of Technologies for the Sustainable Development of an R&D Center," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Mahmoudi, Reza & Emrouznejad, Ali & Shetab-Boushehri, Seyyed-Nader & Hejazi, Seyed Reza, 2020. "The origins, development and future directions of data envelopment analysis approach in transportation systems," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Qingjin Wang & Mengqi Lyu, 2025. "The Relationship Between Data-Intelligence Empowerment, Knowledge Diversification, and Knowledge Recombinant Capabilities: Research on Sustainability of Chinese High-Tech Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-24, January.
    11. Meyer, Patrick & Jonas, Julia M. & Roth, Angela, 2020. "Frontline Employees' Acceptance of and Resistance to Service Robots in Stationary Retail - An Exploratory Interview Study," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 4(1), pages 21-34.
    12. Sheikh-Zadeh, Alireza & Rossetti, Manuel D. & Scott, Marc A., 2021. "Performance-based inventory classification methods for large-Scale multi-echelon replenishment systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    13. Rivero-Iglesias, Jose M. & Puente, Javier & Fernandez, Isabel & León, Omar, 2023. "Integrated model for the assessment of power generation alternatives through analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy inference system. Case study of Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 563-581.
    14. Alexandra Lenis Escobar & Ramón Rueda López & Jorge E. García Guerrero & Enrique Salinas Cuadrado, 2020. "Design of Strategies for the Implementation and Management of a Complementary Monetary System Using the SWOT-AHP Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    15. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio, 2016. "Combining analytical hierarchy process and Choquet integral within non-additive robust ordinal regression," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 2-18.
    16. Philip-Mark Spanidis & Christos Roumpos & Francis Pavloudakis, 2020. "A Multi-Criteria Approach for the Evaluation of Low Risk Restoration Projects in Continuous Surface Lignite Mines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    17. Lina Bairašauskienė, 2017. "Headmaster’s Competencies in Management Area: Evaluating the Significance Level of Managerial Competencies in Lithuanian Comprehensive Schools," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, ejms_v2_i.
    18. Hua Zhang & Shaofeng Yuan, 2023. "How and When Does Big Data Analytics Capability Boost Innovation Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Chin-Yi Chen & Jih-Jeng Huang, 2019. "Deriving Fuzzy Weights of the Fuzzy Analytic Network Process via Fuzzy Inverse Matrix," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-14, October.
    20. Mateusz Hämmerling & Joanna Kocięcka & Stanisław Zaborowski, 2021. "AHP as a Useful Tool in the Assessment of the Technical Condition of Hydrotechnical Constructions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:346:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-024-06086-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.