IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v334y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-022-04845-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A semi-supervised learning approach for variance reduction in life insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Jimenez

    (FRACTALES)

  • Yahia Salhi

    (Univ Lyon)

Abstract

Monte-Carlo based valuation in life insurance involves the simulation of various components of the balance sheet: portfolios, guarantees, assets mix, market conditions and many other specific risk factors; which can be time-consuming. In view of the time needed to achieve this task, insurers are then facing a trade-off of balancing the number of simulations against the uncertainty surrounding the estimated quantity. In the current paper, we propose a variance-reduction methodology using a machine learning technique. It roots from the unsupervised learning literature in conjunction with the quantization of random processes. The goal is to reduce the number of simulated Brownian paths, using auxiliary scenarios that can be seen as path clusters, which efficiently and accurately approximate the initial ones with regards to an adequate measure of distance. Moreover, we introduce penalty to accommodate for various inputs of the initial conditions of risk factors. By doing so, we implicitly assign labels to the scenarios and thus advocate using a semi-supervised learning to enhance the performance of the scenarios reduction by imposing an additional impurity condition on the clusters based on these labels. This is made possible thanks to a decomposition property of the insurers cash-flows, which allows to disentangle the initial conditions of risk factors from the Brownian motions driving their dynamics. The training of the proposed learning algorithm is based on an adaptation of the well-known k-means algorithm. An intensive numerical study is carried out over a range of simulation setups to compare the performances of the proposed methodology. We show, numerically, that the proposed methodology outperforms some classical variance reduction approach. Also, using a real-life dataset, we show that our methodology outperforms some conventional variance reduction used by life insurance practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Jimenez & Yahia Salhi, 2024. "A semi-supervised learning approach for variance reduction in life insurance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 334(1), pages 157-184, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:334:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04845-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-04845-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-022-04845-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-022-04845-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petri Hilli & Matti Koivu & Teemu Pennanen & Antero Ranne, 2007. "A stochastic programming model for asset liability management of a Finnish pension company," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 115-139, July.
    2. Hainaut, Donatien & Devolder, Pierre & Pelsser, Antoon, 2018. "Robust evaluation of SCR for participating life insurances under Solvency II," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 107-123.
    3. Conze, Antoine & Viswanathan, 1991. "Path Dependent Options: The Case of Lookback Options," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 46(5), pages 1893-1907, December.
    4. Matthieu Chauvigny & Laurent Devineau & Stéphane Loisel & Véronique Maume-Deschamps, 2011. "Fast remote but not extreme quantiles with multiple factors. Applications to Solvency II and Enterprise Risk Management," Post-Print hal-00517766, HAL.
    5. Aurore Bignon & Alexandre Ndjeng-Ndjeng & Yahia Salhi & Pierre-Emmanuel Thérond, 2019. "A Reduced-Form Model for A Life Insurance’s Net Asset Value," Post-Print hal-02106126, HAL.
    6. Fabrice Borel-Mathurin & Julien Vedani, 2019. "Market-consistent valuation: a step towards calculation stability," Working Papers hal-02282378, HAL.
    7. Nicole El Karoui & Stéphane Loisel & Jean-Luc Prigent & Julien Vedani, 2017. "Market inconsistencies of the market-consistent European life insurance economic valuations: pitfalls and practical solutions," Post-Print hal-01242023, HAL.
    8. Aurore Bignon & Alexandre Ndjeng-Ndjeng & Yahia Salhi & Pierre-Emmanuel Thérond, 2019. "A Reduced-Form Model for A Life Insurance’s Net Asset Value," Working Papers hal-02106126, HAL.
    9. Bauer, Daniel & Bergmann, Daniela & Kiesel, Rüdiger, 2010. "On the Risk-Neutral Valuation of Life Insurance Contracts with Numerical Methods in View," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 65-95, May.
    10. Floryszczak, Anthony & Le Courtois, Olivier & Majri, Mohamed, 2016. "Inside the Solvency 2 Black Box: Net Asset Values and Solvency Capital Requirements with a least-squares Monte-Carlo approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 15-26.
    11. Anthony Floryszczak & Olivier Le Courtois & Mohamed Majri, 2016. "Inside the Solvency 2 Black Box : Net asset values and solvency capital requirements with a least-squares Monte-Carlo approach," Post-Print hal-02313445, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre-Edouard Arrouy & Alexandre Boumezoued & Bernard Lapeyre & Sophian Mehalla, 2022. "Economic Scenario Generators: a risk management tool for insurance," Post-Print hal-03671943, HAL.
    2. Aur'elien Alfonsi & Adel Cherchali & Jose Arturo Infante Acevedo, 2019. "A full and synthetic model for Asset-Liability Management in life insurance, and analysis of the SCR with the standard formula," Papers 1908.00811, arXiv.org.
    3. Fabrice Borel-Mathurin & Nicole El Karoui & Stéphane Loisel & Julien Vedani, 2020. "Locality in time of the European insurance regulation "risk-neutral" valuation framework, a pre-and post-Covid analysis and further developments," Working Papers hal-02905181, HAL.
    4. Pierre-Edouard Arrouy & Alexandre Boumezoued & Bernard Lapeyre & Sophian Mehalla, 2022. "Economic Scenario Generators: a risk management tool for insurance," Working Papers hal-03671943, HAL.
    5. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    6. Le Courtois Olivier & Majri Mohamed & Shen Li, 2021. "Utility-Consistent Valuation Schemes for the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment of Life Insurance Companies," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 47-79, January.
    7. Hainaut, Donatien & Devolder, Pierre & Pelsser, Antoon, 2018. "Robust evaluation of SCR for participating life insurances under Solvency II," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 107-123.
    8. Claus Baumgart & Johannes Krebs & Robert Lempertseder & Oliver Pfaffel, 2019. "Quantifying Life Insurance Risk using Least-Squares Monte Carlo," Papers 1910.03951, arXiv.org.
    9. Alfonsi, Aurélien & Cherchali, Adel & Infante Acevedo, Jose Arturo, 2021. "Multilevel Monte-Carlo for computing the SCR with the standard formula and other stress tests," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 234-260.
    10. Aur'elien Alfonsi & Adel Cherchali & Jose Arturo Infante Acevedo, 2020. "Multilevel Monte-Carlo for computing the SCR with the standard formula and other stress tests," Papers 2010.12651, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    11. Hainaut, Donatien & Akbaraly, Adnane, 2023. "Risk management with Local Least Squares Monte-Carlo," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2023003, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    12. Massimo Costabile & Fabio Viviano, 2021. "Modeling the Future Value Distribution of a Life Insurance Portfolio," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Clemente, Gian Paolo & Rabitti, Giovanni, 2024. "Why insurance regulators need to require sensitivity settings of internal models for their approval," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    14. Hongjun Ha & Daniel Bauer, 2022. "A least-squares Monte Carlo approach to the estimation of enterprise risk," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 417-459, July.
    15. Massimo Costabile & Fabio Viviano, 2020. "Testing the Least-Squares Monte Carlo Method for the Evaluation of Capital Requirements in Life Insurance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, May.
    16. Bjork, Tomas, 2009. "Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780199574742, Decembrie.
    17. Hainaut, Donatien, 2012. "Multidimensional Lee–Carter model with switching mortality processes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 236-246.
    18. Wang, Gu & Zou, Bin, 2021. "Optimal fee structure of variable annuities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 587-601.
    19. Yang, Zhaoqiang, 2020. "Default probability of American lookback option in a mixed jump-diffusion model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    20. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:334:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04845-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.