IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v312y2022i2d10.1007_s10479-022-04628-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective optimisation for constructing cyclic appointment schedules for elective and urgent patients

Author

Listed:
  • T. Meersman

    (Ghent University)

  • B. Maenhout

    (Ghent University
    FlandersMake@UGent – corelab CVAMO)

Abstract

In this paper, we study the construction of a cyclic appointment schedule in an outpatient department. In particular, we determine the capacity distribution between elective and urgent patients and the scheduling of the time slots reserved for these patients such that the operational waiting times of elective and urgent patients are minimised. The proposed solution methodology devises a Pareto set of cyclic appointment schedules based on these waiting times with different capacity allocations for urgent patients. An approximation of the Pareto set of non-dominated schedules is obtained using a multi-objective archived simulated annealing heuristic. To accurately validate the cyclic appointment schedules, we incorporate operational decision-making via scheduling individual patients. To this end, we simulate operational variability, i.e., patient arrivals, no-show behaviour, punctuality and scan durations, based on real-life input data. The patients are assigned one-by-one using an online scheduling rule. Computational experiments are conducted with a real-life case study. We compare different appointment scheduling rules and discuss the impact of the capacity distribution between elective and urgent patients and the timing of urgent slots in the cyclic appointment schedules. The results show that the distribution of capacity between patient types, the timing of urgent slots and appointment rules all have significant impacts on patient waiting times. Appointment waiting times improve when urgent slots are spread equally over and throughout the days considered and when the Bailey–Welch rule is used to schedule patients. Trade-offs between elective and urgent waiting times resulting from different capacity distributions or slot timing are exemplified via a Pareto front. The proposed method outperforms relevant single-pass methodologies, and we demonstrate that its performance is strengthened thanks to the integrated optimisation of strategic, tactical and operational decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • T. Meersman & B. Maenhout, 2022. "Multi-objective optimisation for constructing cyclic appointment schedules for elective and urgent patients," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 909-948, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:312:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04628-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-04628-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-022-04628-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-022-04628-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter VanBerkel & John Blake, 2007. "A comprehensive simulation for wait time reduction and capacity planning applied in general surgery," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 373-385, December.
    2. Lee, Sangbok & Yih, Yuehwern, 2014. "Reducing patient-flow delays in surgical suites through determining start-times of surgical cases," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 620-629.
    3. Y Huang & P Zuniga, 2012. "Dynamic overbooking scheduling system to improve patient access," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 63(6), pages 810-820, June.
    4. Lamiri, Mehdi & Xie, Xiaolan & Dolgui, Alexandre & Grimaud, Frederic, 2008. "A stochastic model for operating room planning with elective and emergency demand for surgery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1026-1037, March.
    5. Edward J. Rising & Robert Baron & Barry Averill, 1973. "A Systems Analysis of a University-Health-Service Outpatient Clinic," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 1030-1047, October.
    6. Guido Kaandorp & Ger Koole, 2007. "Optimal outpatient appointment scheduling," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 217-229, September.
    7. Zhou, Liping & Geng, Na & Jiang, Zhibin & Wang, Xiuxian, 2018. "Multi-objective capacity allocation of hospital wards combining revenue and equity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 220-233.
    8. Qu, Xiuli & Rardin, Ronald L. & Williams, Julie Ann S. & Willis, Deanna R., 2007. "Matching daily healthcare provider capacity to demand in advanced access scheduling systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 812-826, December.
    9. Lawrence W. Robinson & Rachel R. Chen, 2010. "A Comparison of Traditional and Open-Access Policies for Appointment Scheduling," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 330-346, June.
    10. Ho, Chrwan-Jyh & Lau, Hon-Shiang, 1999. "Evaluating the impact of operating conditions on the performance of appointment scheduling rules in service systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(3), pages 542-553, February.
    11. Pham, Dinh-Nguyen & Klinkert, Andreas, 2008. "Surgical case scheduling as a generalized job shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1011-1025, March.
    12. Yigal Gerchak & Diwakar Gupta & Mordechai Henig, 1996. "Reservation Planning for Elective Surgery Under Uncertain Demand for Emergency Surgery," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 321-334, March.
    13. Lara Wiesche & Matthias Schacht & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "Strategies for interday appointment scheduling in primary care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 403-418, September.
    14. Morikawa, Katsumi & Takahashi, Katsuhiko, 2017. "Scheduling appointments for walk-ins," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 60-66.
    15. Fügener, Andreas & Hans, Erwin W. & Kolisch, Rainer & Kortbeek, Nikky & Vanberkel, Peter T., 2014. "Master surgery scheduling with consideration of multiple downstream units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 227-236.
    16. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Jalali, Zahra & Klassen, Kenneth J, 2017. "Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 3-34.
    17. Vanhoucke, Mario & Coelho, Jose & Debels, Dieter & Maenhout, Broos & Tavares, Luis V., 2008. "An evaluation of the adequacy of project network generators with systematically sampled networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(2), pages 511-524, June.
    18. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    19. Deceuninck, Matthias & Fiems, Dieter & De Vuyst, Stijn, 2018. "Outpatient scheduling with unpunctual patients and no-shows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 195-207.
    20. Saremi, Alireza & Jula, Payman & ElMekkawy, Tarek & Wang, G. Gary, 2013. "Appointment scheduling of outpatient surgical services in a multistage operating room department," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 646-658.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Omolbanin Mashkani & Andreas T. Ernst & Dhananjay Thiruvady & Hanyu Gu, 2023. "Minimizing patients total clinical condition deterioration in operating theatre departments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 821-857, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    2. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    3. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Jalali, Zahra & Klassen, Kenneth J, 2017. "Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 3-34.
    4. Eun, Joonyup & Kim, Sang-Phil & Yih, Yuehwern & Tiwari, Vikram, 2019. "Scheduling elective surgery patients considering time-dependent health urgency: Modeling and solution approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 137-153.
    5. Silva, Thiago A.O. & de Souza, Mauricio C., 2020. "Surgical scheduling under uncertainty by approximate dynamic programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Yao Xiao & Reena Yoogalingam, 2021. "Reserved capacity policies for operating room scheduling," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 107-122, June.
    7. Bing Wang & Xingbao Han & Xianxia Zhang & Shaohua Zhang, 2015. "Predictive-reactive scheduling for single surgical suite subject to random emergency surgery," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 949-966, November.
    8. Miao Bai & Bjorn Berg & Esra Sisikoglu Sir & Mustafa Y. Sir, 2023. "Partially partitioned templating strategies for outpatient specialty practices," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 301-318, January.
    9. Pan, Xingwei & Geng, Na & Xie, Xiaolan & Wen, Jing, 2020. "Managing appointments with waiting time targets and random walk-ins," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Sauré, Antoine & Patrick, Jonathan & Tyldesley, Scott & Puterman, Martin L., 2012. "Dynamic multi-appointment patient scheduling for radiation therapy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 573-584.
    11. H. Romero & N. Dellaert & S. Geer & M. Frunt & M. Jansen-Vullers & G. Krekels, 2013. "Admission and capacity planning for the implementation of one-stop-shop in skin cancer treatment using simulation-based optimization," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 75-86, March.
    12. Soltani, Mohamad & Samorani, Michele & Kolfal, Bora, 2019. "Appointment scheduling with multiple providers and stochastic service times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 667-683.
    13. Francesca Guerriero & Rosita Guido, 2011. "Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 89-114, March.
    14. Van-Anh Truong, 2015. "Optimal Advance Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(7), pages 1584-1597, July.
    15. Şeyda Gür & Tamer Eren & Hacı Mehmet Alakaş, 2019. "Surgical Operation Scheduling with Goal Programming and Constraint Programming: A Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-24, March.
    16. Jose M. Molina-Pariente & Erwin W. Hans & Jose M. Framinan, 2018. "A stochastic approach for solving the operating room scheduling problem," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 224-251, June.
    17. Oualid Jouini & Saif Benjaafar & Bingnan Lu & Siqiao Li & Benjamin Legros, 2022. "Appointment-driven queueing systems with non-punctual customers," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 1-56, June.
    18. Range, Troels Martin & Kozlowski, Dawid & Petersen, Niels Chr., 2019. "Dynamic job assignment: A column generation approach with an application to surgery allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 78-93.
    19. Pan, Xingwei & Geng, Na & Xie, Xiaolan, 2021. "Appointment scheduling and real-time sequencing strategies for patient unpunctuality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 246-260.
    20. Aisha Tayyab & Saif Ullah & Mohammed Fazle Baki, 2023. "An Outer Approximation Method for Scheduling Elective Surgeries with Sequence Dependent Setup Times to Multiple Operating Rooms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:312:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04628-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.