IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v277y2019i2d10.1007_s10479-018-2780-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pseudo conservation for partially fluid, partially lossy queueing systems

Author

Listed:
  • Veeraruna Kavitha

    (Indian Institute of Technology)

  • Jayakrishnan Nair

    (Indian Institute of Technology Bombay)

  • Raman Kumar Sinha

    (Indian Institute of Technology)

Abstract

We consider a queueing system with heterogeneous customers. One class of customers is eager; these customers are impatient and leave the system if service does not commence immediately upon arrival. Customers of the second class are tolerant; these customers have larger service requirements and can wait for service. In this paper, we establish pseudo-conservation laws relating the performance of the eager class (measured in terms of the long run fraction of customers blocked) and the tolerant class (measured in terms of the steady state performance, e.g., sojourn time, number in the system, workload) under a certain partial fluid limit. This fluid limit involves scaling the arrival rate as well as the service rate of the eager class proportionately to infinity, such that the offered load corresponding to the eager class remains constant. The workload of the tolerant class remains unscaled. Interestingly, our pseudo-conservation laws hold for a broad class of admission control and scheduling policies. This means that under the aforementioned fluid limit, the performance of the tolerant class depends only on the blocking probability of the eager class, and not on the specific admission control policy that produced that blocking probability. Our psuedo-conservation laws also characterize the achievable region for our system, which captures the space of feasible tradeoffs between the performance experienced by the two classes. We also provide two families of complete scheduling policies, which span the achievable region over their parameter space. Finally, we show that our pseudo-conservation laws also apply in several scenarios where eager customers have a limited waiting area and exhibit balking and/or reneging behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Veeraruna Kavitha & Jayakrishnan Nair & Raman Kumar Sinha, 2019. "Pseudo conservation for partially fluid, partially lossy queueing systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(2), pages 255-292, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:277:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-018-2780-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-018-2780-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-018-2780-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-018-2780-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harrison White & Lee S. Christie, 1958. "Queuing with Preemptive Priorities or with Breakdown," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 79-95, February.
    2. C. J. Ancker & A. V. Gafarian, 1963. "Some Queuing Problems with Balking and Reneging. I," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 88-100, February.
    3. C. J. Ancker & A. V. Gafarian, 1963. "Some Queuing Problems with Balking and Reneging---II," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(6), pages 928-937, December.
    4. A. Federgruen & H. Groenevelt, 1988. "M/G/c Queueing Systems with Multiple Customer Classes: Characterization and Control of Achievable Performance Under Nonpreemptive Priority Rules," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(9), pages 1121-1138, September.
    5. J. George Shanthikumar & David D. Yao, 1992. "Multiclass Queueing Systems: Polymatroidal Structure and Optimal Scheduling Control," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(3-supplem), pages 293-299, June.
    6. L. Kleinrock, 1964. "A delay dependent queue discipline," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3‐4), pages 329-341, September.
    7. Leonard Kleinrock, 1965. "A conservation law for a wide class of queueing disciplines," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(2), pages 181-192, June.
    8. Ward Whitt, 1999. "Improving Service by Informing Customers About Anticipated Delays," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 192-207, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Niño-Mora, 2006. "Restless Bandit Marginal Productivity Indices, Diminishing Returns, and Optimal Control of Make-to-Order/Make-to-Stock M/G/1 Queues," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 50-84, February.
    2. Bertsimas, Dimitris., 1995. "The achievable region method in the optimal control of queueing systems : formulations, bounds and policies," Working papers 3837-95., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    3. Pala, Ali & Zhuang, Jun, 2018. "Security screening queues with impatient applicants: A new model with a case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 919-930.
    4. Amina Angelika Bouchentouf & Aicha Messabihi, 2018. "Heterogeneous two-server queueing system with reverse balking and reneging," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(2), pages 251-267, June.
    5. Vanlerberghe, Jasper & Walraevens, Joris & Maertens, Tom & Bruneel, Herwig, 2018. "Calculation of the performance region of an easy-to-optimize alternative for Generalized Processor Sharing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 625-635.
    6. Navid Ghaffarzadegan & Richard C. Larson, 2018. "SD meets OR: a new synergy to address policy problems," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 327-353, January.
    7. R. Garbe & K. D. Glazebrook, 1998. "Submodular Returns and Greedy Heuristics for Queueing Scheduling Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 336-346, June.
    8. Tianhu Deng & Ying‐Ju Chen & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2015. "Optimal pricing and scheduling control of product shipping," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(3), pages 215-227, April.
    9. Mohammad Firouz & Linda Li & Burcu B. Keskin, 2022. "Managing equipment rentals: Unreliable fleet, impatient customers, and finite commitment capacity," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(11), pages 3963-3981, November.
    10. Cheng-Dar Liou, 2015. "Markovian queue optimisation analysis with an unreliable server subject to working breakdowns and impatient customers," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(12), pages 2165-2182, September.
    11. Huiyin Ouyang & Nilay Taník Argon & Serhan Ziya, 2022. "Assigning Priorities (or Not) in Service Systems with Nonlinear Waiting Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1233-1255, February.
    12. Bertsimas, Dimitris. & Niño-Mora, Jose., 1994. "Restless bandit, linear programming relaxations and a primal-dual heuristic," Working papers 3727-94., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    13. P. Vijaya Laxmi & V. Goswami & K. Jyothsna, 2013. "Optimization of Balking and Reneging Queue with Vacation Interruption under -Policy," Journal of Optimization, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-9, June.
    14. Sheng Zhu & Jinting Wang & Bin Liu, 2020. "Equilibrium joining strategies in the Mn/G/1 queue with server breakdowns and repairs," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2163-2187, December.
    15. Rouba Ibrahim & Mor Armony & Achal Bassamboo, 2017. "Does the Past Predict the Future? The Case of Delay Announcements in Service Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1762-1780, June.
    16. Dimitris Bertsimas & José Niño-Mora, 1996. "Optimization of multiclass queueing networks with changeover times via the achievable region method: Part II, the multi-station case," Economics Working Papers 314, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Aug 1998.
    17. Rouba Ibrahim & Ward Whitt, 2011. "Wait-Time Predictors for Customer Service Systems with Time-Varying Demand and Capacity," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1106-1118, October.
    18. Qiuping Yu & Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo & Seyed Iravani, 2018. "Managing Customer Expectations and Priorities in Service Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3942-3970, August.
    19. Dimitris Bertsimas & José Niño-Mora, 1999. "Optimization of Multiclass Queueing Networks with Changeover Times Via the Achievable Region Approach: Part I, The Single-Station Case," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 306-330, May.
    20. Liao Wang & David D. Yao, 2021. "Risk Hedging for Production Planning," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1825-1837, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:277:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-018-2780-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.