IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v274y2019i1d10.1007_s10479-018-2933-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aircraft selection modeling: a multi-step heuristic to enumerate airlift alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob D. Maywald

    (Air Force Institute of Technology)

  • Adam D. Reiman

    (Air Force Institute of Technology)

  • Robert E. Overstreet

    (Iowa State University)

  • Alan W. Johnson

    (Air Force Institute of Technology)

Abstract

We consider the use of the new C-130J-30 aircraft for long distance (strategic) cargo movement. Currently, only large aircraft, the C-5 and the C-17, are identified as strategic airlift assets by the United States Air Force. Our mathematical model identifies all logical airframe combinations to perform a cargo movement given a set of constraints. Using previously developed routing algorithms and fuel metrics, we evaluated the combinations and calculated the potential savings had the most fuel efficient combination been selected. Analyzing 1 month of historic data for four long distance routes, our proposed model suggests that savings could have been more than one million dollars.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob D. Maywald & Adam D. Reiman & Robert E. Overstreet & Alan W. Johnson, 2019. "Aircraft selection modeling: a multi-step heuristic to enumerate airlift alternatives," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 425-445, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:274:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-018-2933-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-018-2933-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-018-2933-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-018-2933-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sami Gabteni & Mattias Grönkvist, 2009. "Combining column generation and constraint programming to solve the tail assignment problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 61-76, October.
    2. Christopher Bayliss & Geert Maere & Jason A. D. Atkin & Marc Paelinck, 2017. "A simulation scenario based mixed integer programming approach to airline reserve crew scheduling under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 252(2), pages 335-363, May.
    3. Zilla Sinuany-Stern & H. Sherman, 2014. "Operations research in the public sector and nonprofit organizations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 221(1), pages 1-8, October.
    4. Lapp, Marcial & Wikenhauser, Florian, 2012. "Incorporating aircraft efficiency measures into the tail assignment problem," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 25-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kiracı, Kasım & Akan, Ercan, 2020. "Aircraft selection by applying AHP and TOPSIS in interval type-2 fuzzy sets," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Prashant Premkumar & P. N. Ram Kumar, 2022. "Locomotive assignment problem: integrating the strategic, tactical and operational level aspects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 867-898, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Ruther & Natashia Boland & Faramroze G. Engineer & Ian Evans, 2017. "Integrated Aircraft Routing, Crew Pairing, and Tail Assignment: Branch-and-Price with Many Pricing Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 177-195, February.
    2. Yingxin Chen & Jing Zhang & Pandu R. Tadikamalla & Lei Zhou, 2019. "The Mechanism of Social Organization Participation in Natural Hazards Emergency Relief: A Case Study Based on the Social Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Liang, Zhe & Feng, Yuan & Zhang, Xiaoning & Wu, Tao & Chaovalitwongse, Wanpracha Art, 2015. "Robust weekly aircraft maintenance routing problem and the extension to the tail assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 238-259.
    4. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Wen, Xin & Sun, Xuting & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2019. "The mean-variance approach for global supply chain risk analysis with air logistics in the blockchain technology era," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 178-191.
    5. Anthony Han & Elvis Li, 2014. "A constraint programming-based approach to the crew scheduling problem of the Taipei mass rapid transit system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 173-193, December.
    6. Carlos Lagos & Felipe Delgado & Mathias A. Klapp, 2020. "Dynamic Optimization for Airline Maintenance Operations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 998-1015, July.
    7. Ma, Qiuzhuo & Song, Haiqing & Zhu, Wenbin, 2018. "Low-carbon airline fleet assignment: A compromise approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 86-102.
    8. Julio Cesar Mosquera Gutierres & Rafael Coradi Leme & Rodrigo Luiz Mendes Mota & Paulo E. Steele Santos, 2021. "Regulatory efficiency decomposition for utilities’ parallel subsystems," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 331-347, March.
    9. Gemma Berenguer & Zuo-Jun (Max) Shen, 2020. "OM Forum—Challenges and Strategies in Managing Nonprofit Operations: An Operations Management Perspective," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 888-905, September.
    10. Vojtech Graf & Dusan Teichmann & Michal Dorda & Lenka Kontrikova, 2021. "Dynamic Model of Contingency Flight Crew Planning Extending to Crew Formation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-28, September.
    11. Anderson Kenji Hirose & Cassius Tadeu Scarpin & José Eduardo Pécora Junior, 2020. "Goal programming approach for political districting in Santa Catarina State: Brazil," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 209-232, April.
    12. Nianyi Wang & Huiling Wang & Shan Pei & Boyu Zhang, 2023. "A Data-Driven Heuristic Method for Irregular Flight Recovery," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Killemsetty, Namesh & Johnson, Michael & Patel, Amit, 2022. "Understanding housing preferences of slum dwellers in India: A community-based operations research approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 699-713.
    14. Zilla Sinuany-Stern & Simona Cohen-Kadosh & Lea Friedman, 2016. "The relationship between the efficiency of orthopedic wards and the socio-economic status of their patients," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 24(4), pages 853-876, December.
    15. Jesica de Armas & Jessica Rodríguez-Pereira & Bruno Vieira & Helena Ramalhinho, 2021. "Optimizing Assistive Technology Operations for Aging Populations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    16. Boon Ean Teoh & S. G. Ponnambalam & Nachiappan Subramanian, 2018. "Data driven safe vehicle routing analytics: a differential evolution algorithm to reduce CO $$_{2}$$ 2 emissions and hazardous risks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 515-538, November.
    17. Akgün, İbrahim & Özkil, Altan & Gören, Selçuk, 2020. "A multimodal, multicommodity, and multiperiod planning problem for coal distribution to poor families," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:274:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-018-2933-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.